You know, I think the better way of approaching it is not to try and debunk dominance training or convince people people who use correction are wrong. Instead, I really believe knocking down and proving wrong stereotypes attached to positive based training would get people much farther. Instead of alienating people and putting them on the defensive which I think happens a lot to CM supporters or even people who use a very positive base and also employ correction at times (Which I have no issue with at all). They are always made out to be the bad guy and feel the need to constantly prove that what they do works. Which, if they are consistent and have good timing it generally will.
I think positive trainers are lumped in with sport and tricks way too much. They are dismissed by the people who say "I just want a good dog." "This is REAL world training" etc.
Mainly, this is me just thinking outloud after reading on FB groups. I constantly read things alluding to clicker training being permissive, cult like, only for weak willed dogs. People being called treat dispensers, dogs unable to be off leash ever, no consequences, rude dogs, not for real life scenarios, needing to starve dogs to make them work etc. You can talk until you're blue in the face why they shouldn't first turn to collar corrections but it's not going to do any good if they don't understand positive training. Then they're set up for failure and it's a self fulfilling prophesy.
End ramble/