And nothing of value was lost.

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#61
You know, we joke in work about a 'black ops squad'. Trust me we have many many people we'd like eliminating.

In reality, you're not changing anything about society for the positive by allowing this kind of stuff to be 'ok'. You're just saying violence is ok.
 

Zizzy35

New Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
248
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
New Jersey
#62
Chances are a new man will step in to do the beating unless this woman gets some serious counseling :eek:

I don't think a huge amount of effort should be put into finding this guy. Its not like he killed a family of four minding their own business,or killed someone during an armed robbery. Why did he have the gun? Who knows? Obviously its not a nice area. Do they have concealed carry there?

If you saw this happening what would YOU do? If you said hey please stop you might get your fragile little head bashed in. Call the cops and you and this girl may be dead before they get anywhere near you. There are people out there who don't care about going back to jail, they know they will probably get back out right away anyway. Some like the atmosphere and want to be there believe it or not! So what if he is high-does that make it ok for him to kill her and possibly you? Because getting high was a choice. Not taking psych meds was a choice. This may sound bad but in the end my life wins.

I want my concealed carry. A bunch of us at work are taking the class this summer. We keep saying that but never get around to it!
No, in New York unless you are a cop or something of that nature you cannot carry a gun. The area itself is ghetto, so I'm assuming the gunman was a gangbanger or something. This was in the projects in a bad area.
 

Locke

Active Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2010
Messages
1,919
Likes
0
Points
36
#63
Sure its. As is having citizens who just walk up and shoot people as one of their first resorts to seeing something they don't like and know nothing about.

I am all for him stopping the man. But pulling out the gun, shooting him in the foot etc are all likely going to stop the man. The shooting the reckless driver IS bang on (as they can kill others, just like this abusive guy could have). Shooting out the tire would have been comparable to shooting this guy in the foot.

And simply because the law allows someone to do something doesn't make it good or right. Loads of countries have some crazy laws that I think are unethical.

NOTE TO ALL VIGILANTES: If I am being beaten, please shoot in foot, whack him with the gun, call the cops, but dont' kill him on my count unless that is the only way to get him to stop. I wouldn't want to live
with that.

ETA: you are assuming that this man walked up and KNEW the other man was going to kill the woman. And this is why I dislike guns, the idea that you MUST kill with them and that they have no other purpose. If you can stop someone by taking out his tibia, why end his life?
Totally agree.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#64
You know, we joke in work about a 'black ops squad'. Trust me we have many many people we'd like eliminating.

In reality, you're not changing anything about society for the positive by allowing this kind of stuff to be 'ok'. You're just saying violence is ok.
^This.
 

CharlieDog

Rude and Not Ginger
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
9,419
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Georgia
#65
If you shoot someone, you shoot to kill. Shooting to injure is the most idiotic thing someone can do. You may think you're saving a life, but if the law ever catches you, you'll realize you destroyed yours by not taking his/hers.
Dead men don't tell tales.
 

Picklepaige

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
1,802
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Mississippi
#67
As a victim of abuse, all I'm going to say is it makes me sick to see people putting this scum's life above that of the woman's.

For human life to have value, the person actually has to be human.

Just my opinion. And if my ex puts another finger on me, he's dead. Either my dad or my best friend will kill him in a second. That knowledge is the only reason he stays away from me; sometimes it takes more than just the threat of jail to stop a person.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#68
I dont' think anyone is putting his life over hers. Its the fact that some stranger (presumably) just stepped in and murdered someone. If he was the woman's brother, for example, I would be fairly ok with this. But the fact that he didn't know (likely) that the man was a serial abuser and just killed him does horrify me.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#69
Well, having a vicious, murderous tyrant, free to attack how and whom he feels like...., who could easily kill some innocent woman or anyone with his bare hands and psychopathic personality... horrifies me. That this dangerous, woman-blugeoning piece slime perished at the hands of a good samaritan should be a relief. Why should citizens leave EVERYTHING up to someone else (cops) when death to an innocent is quite possibly immanent? I wish there were more people who take responsibility to step up to the plate when another person's life is threatened. That does not mean, as it was purposely misunderstood, that because you don't like something someone is doing, you have a right to shoot them. Of course not! That's the most ridiculous thing ever. We're talking about saving a life here of an innocent person. Speculating whether or not less lethal force would have been effective is ridiculous. Why should the good samaritan put his own life at a higher risk by leaving this piece of crap with the ability to shoot him or otherwise maim or kill him?

That crazed person chose to do what he did. There are consequences to every action and if he didn't get that, too dam bad. Too bad about his child hood. That shouldn't give him the right to keep doing what he's doing.

I can't believe the bleeding hearts over this monster. What about the victims? How many past women has he terrorized before this one? How many more would have come after this one? How many children? I think it's time to think of them. "Violence" (the defender shooting) IS often necessary and to say it doesn't help is illogical. Of course it helped. It stopped him didn't it? If he would have been carted off to jail, you know darn well he'd be out in a flash and probably kill her for certain the next time. Too bad there aren't tougher consequences regularly for vicious criminals. People like that should all be eliminated.
 

GlassOnion

Thanks, and Gig 'em.
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
9,065
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Tejas
#71
I am all for him stopping the man. But pulling out the gun, shooting him in the foot etc are all likely going to stop the man. The shooting the reckless driver IS bang on (as they can kill others, just like this abusive guy could have). Shooting out the tire would have been comparable to shooting this guy in the foot.
Shooting someone to wound is just giving them an opportunity to shoot you back. You may say "but they're injured and can't fight back" but you should know as well as I do that epinephrine is a powerful thing.

Also you get sued for that ****. You shoot to kill for your physical safety and monetary safety when you live in such a litigious society. As someone else said: dead men tell no tales, meaning they can't hire a good lawyer and lie through their teeth to get revenge on you.

Shoot out a cars tire?! Hell no! Then they lose control of the vehicle and take out someone else!
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#72
Ok i have a question then....

We will talk hypotheticaly

You came up on this scene. Guy is brutally beating this woman. Just laying into her with all he has. Shes screaming for help

You can see shes already Broken and bloodied. The man just wont stop no matter what you say. You threaten to call the cops and he doesnt stop. You call but the
Police cant get there for another 10 minutes. You are the only other person there to help this innocent person.

You try to attack him but to no avail. The only weapon you have is a gun. He's going to beat her to death most certainly. This attacker also has a gun that he could turn on you

What would you do? If you shoot him in the leg he can pull his gun out and shoot you dead. Whats your plan? Do you just walk away hoping the cops get there in time? Do you shoot him in the leg ( just make sure you miss the artery) and hope he doesnt grab his gun and shoot you back?
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
10,119
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
wasilla alaska
#73
Im gonna side with those that think the shooting is justified.

I have a question for those that dont think it was justified.

If you are being beaten, molested, or just generically being violated, should I just let the person continue or should I do whatever is in my power to stop them? Would you feel bad if I stopped the violation by killing the person?
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#74
Ok i have a question then....

We will talk hypotheticaly

You came up on this scene. Guy is brutally beating this woman. Just laying into her with all he has. Shes screaming for help

You can see shes already Broken and bloodied. The man just wont stop no matter what you say. You threaten to call the cops and he doesnt stop. You call but the
Police cant get there for another 10 minutes. You are the only other person there to help this innocent person.

You try to attack him but to no avail. The only weapon you have is a gun. He's going to beat her to death most certainly. This attacker also has a gun that he could turn on you

What would you do? If you shoot him in the leg he can pull his gun out and shoot you dead. Whats your plan? Do you just walk away hoping the cops get there in time? Do you shoot him in the leg ( just make sure you miss the artery) and hope he doesnt grab his gun and shoot you back?
I already answered this one, and Blues.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
10,119
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
wasilla alaska
#75
I already answered this one, and Blues.
And Im not reading through 70 something posts to find it. I also will not ask someone that is being attacked if I can use deadly force to stop the attacker.

If I am being violated I would not feel guilt or empathy if my attacker was shot and killed.
 

lyria

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2011
Messages
43
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
East Coast (US)
#76
Actually, use of deadly force is legal if necessary to defend the life of a third party. If the woman's life was in danger, the "vigilante" has an affirmative defense and need not have fled the scene... unless he did not have lawful possession of the weapon in question, which could still be a problem.
 

sillysally

Obey the Toad.
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
5,074
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
A hole in the bottom of the sea.
#77
I can only pray that if some lowlife thug is beating the life out of me or one of my children, that a hero would come along and end it by taking out the thug.

There was a situation here in Baton Rouge a few years ago where a cop pulled over a driver after he cut into a funeral procession all so he could run through a red light. The driver got out and started yelling and the cop and then proceeded to start beating on him. It happened so quick and the cop didn't have a chance to get his weapon. The driver, on the other hand, was trying to get to the cop's gun...or stop the cop from getting to it. And did I mention that this driver was a professional prize boxer? Thus, IMO, his hands were deadly weapons.

A good samaritan in the parking lot, who happened to be licensed to carry a concealed weapon, shot the driver of the car. The cop had already suffered a broken nose, broken jaw, had some internal injuries. The driver refused to let up even when asked/demanded to stop. Thus he was shot. He died.

Who was wrong? Do we just sit back and watch these things go on?

As for the above incident, I was at the red-light right by the Autozone where it occurred. I witnessed the entire scenario and spent 5 hours of my day stuck at that intersection and giving my account of what I saw to responding officers. (as did many other drivers stopped at the light when it occurred as well as patrons at the store)

When someone is actively harming someone, they give up their "right" to not be harmed.
:hail::hail::hail:
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#78
If I ever had to interfere where I could physically not stop someone from beating someone else... I would pull out my pepper spray :) I have yet to hear about a human not impacted by it.

This is for the utmost emergency. I can disable someone without having to deal with the moral consequences of taking his life.... I wonder, how does that go with the ten commandments for the religious folks here?
 

jess2416

Who woulda thought
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
22,560
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
45
Location
NC
#79
I wonder, how does that go with the ten commandments for the religious folks here?
Thou shalt not kill unless its in your best interest or someone else's

^^ that one ;)

ETA: Just for the record, in my PERSONAL beliefs, I do not believe that the 10 commandments are meant for "us"..

They were meant for the people living in those times..

ETAx2: Yes, it does say an eye for an eye, but if we really wanna go there, that means that dude shoulda started beating dude, not shoot him in the face.. right?
 
Last edited:

CharlieDog

Rude and Not Ginger
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
9,419
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Georgia
#80
Well, the bible says "Thou shalt not kill" but it also says "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth"
 

Members online

Top