Ok, let me blow a fuse here
One, the primary objection to this is it may include many kinds of birth control, and sterilization, as well as abortions
Two, it covers ANY abortion and ANY sterization, explicitly. So, if the fetus is alive, no matter how much the mother's life is in danger, it can be refused.
Three, it will override state laws requiring morning-after pills be offered to rape victims
Four, it says you can't refuse a job. So you have a gynecology practice that does abortions, and you need a nurse, and an pro-lifer shows up and the only way in which she is not qualified is that she won't do abortions. She could get a job elsewhere, but she's showing up, because SHE KNOWS SHE CAN SUE YOU IF SHE DOESN'T GET A JOB. If you think this won't happen, you are delusional. There are other jobs that don't involve abortion. Most places don't DO abortions. If you don't like abortions, don't get a job somewhere you will asked to, because you can not perform a basic function that job. A non-medical example: If I had a moral objeciton to reprisenting oil companies, I wouldn't work here, and I wouldn't be raising a fuss that they quite reasonably refused me a job, because that's part of what they do here.
Five, ok, look. I'm only nominally pro-choice. But I am going to lose my mind soon at the stupidity that comes out of pro-lifers mouths. One, a baby is not a fetus is not an embryo is not a fertilized egg. The real concern here is that a fertilized egg, not yet detectable as a preganancy, will be elevated to the level of a baby, and any thing that MIGHT lead to a fertilized egg being damaged could be classified as abortion. Two, aborting babies that are missing a finger is wrong. I'm not going to take on DS, that's more complicated. But you do realize, don't you, that many babies which are aborted for deformities are much worse off than either? Anacephaly, Triplody, horrific, deadly, painful deformities? Ones that kill at birth, shortly after birth, or lead to a life of agony or life as a human vegitable? You do realize that? so if you want to oppose abortion of deformed babies, don't consider the fingers and DS, consider the horrific deformities before you spout of. Three, people who use abortion as a form of birth control are scum. They are also rare, and we have statistics to prove it. Most abortions are accidents, from failed BC, or a one night, or rape . . . the woman did not have sex thinking "I'll just get an abortion." Maybe its wrong, but get the facts and the circumstances straight before you shoot off your mouth. Four, look at where this might lead. They may add in medications other than BC, and end of life issues. It may be a Trojan horse for greatly expanding the definition of abortion.
Six, this effects federally funded places, like big hospitals. Not mom and pop pharmacies, not your local doctors offices. So, if Mr. Smith doesn't want to sell Sally BC, this won't help him. Won't hurt him either. He can take it up with the state.