casablanca1 said:
You've been calling the OP an accusatory drama queen with a cockamamie story and an untrained dog, complained that various other people were wrong to side with the OP, and bitched unmercifully about fencing. It's one thing to argue that maybe people should give the neighbors the benefit of the doubt - attacking a fellow poster over it is another thing.
* The OP was accustaory. The title of the thread for pete's sake is "Cruel neighbor hurt Mocha!! I'm SO MAD!!". That is accusatory.
* The OP has been very dramatic about the whole thing. Case in point, the OP stated:
"I couldn't even bring myself to look over to the neighbor's house side right now, let alone talking to them. I'd either burst into tears and couldn't speak or start yelling uncontrollably.." That is pretty dramatic in my opinion. It also not the most rational and efficient way to deal with a crisis in my opinion.
* The story is cockamamie in my opinion.
* I never stated the dog was not trained. Please do not put words in my mouth. I did state the following:
If your dog was trained well (which I am assuming he must surely be), he would have come when you called him if he was outside. I was making this statement to show that the neighbors must have indeed lured the dog indoors so that they could torture it. Because if it was in the neighbors yard when the OP was calling its name, it would have come running.
* I have greatly emphasized the fencing aspect here. I agree. As it is the
most important piece of this puzzle. One that was initially missing. One that thankfully the OP has taken steps to remedy. And I think all would agree if there was adequate fencing to begin with, this thread never would have existed, because the dog never would have been injured.
* In my opinion other posters were wrong to come to the conclusion that the neighbor lured the dog and then decided to clip its nail so short that they bled.
* I didn't know that offering my opinion and reminding some of what they themselves wrote is considered an attack? You will have to explain that one to me. The only attacks I have seen in this thread are the "judge, jury and executioner" attacks against the neighbor - without ANY proof mind you.
How come you have not commented on other posters unfairly attacking the neighbor without ANY proof as to what happened?
I am very glad the pooch is recovering. The last thing I want to see happen is someone's pet be injured. But at the same time I also don't want to see an "accusatory mob mentality" break out and completely miss the main point of the story - that you need to properly fence in your dog and/or provide adequate supervision.