Defy them with realistic arguments. It'll be interesting to see you argue how it's perfectly legal and ok to tresspass against a private owner or governing body without consequences.
Simple sentence structuring. "It's" is a contraction of "it" and "is", "it" being "the punishment for indescent exposure".
Let me write it out for you the long way:
"Be it right or wrong, the punishment for breastfeeding on a plane against the wishes of that plane's owners and representatives is no different than if I were getting a blowjob in the back row."
The end result is the same.
Really buddy, quit while you're ahead. I'm well aware of what contraction's are etc. It appears you don't have quite the grasp on the English language you think you do. I gave you a chance to go over it again, but it's obvious now that you'll never make the connection, so I"ll do it for you.
your quote:
It's indecent exposure according to the United States. Be it right or wrong, it's no different than if I were getting a blowjob in the back row...regardless of the purpose or end result, it's far too kin to the stuff you see late at night on Cinimax.
So in the first sentece
It's indecent exposure- is refering to breast feeding correct? Since that's what the entire thread is about, I think this logic is of the simple variety you can appreciate.
So then in the second sentence you are substituting
it to mean the punishment for indecent exposure?? and then your sentence would go on to say, the punishment for indecent exposure is no different than if I were getting a blowjob in the back row..... Indecent exposure is far too kin to the stuff you see late at night...
Is that what you're trying to get us to believe? If it is, you're high school english teacher would be very disappointed.
You use It's to represent breast feeding, this entire thread is about breast feeding, yet you want us to believe that suddenly
means punishment for indecent exposure??
She can't really sue here because planes are private property. It's like if you came on my yard and pitched a tent. If I say no tents allowed you kind of have to adhere.
Your concept of law isn't much better. Airlines aren't goverened as personal property such as your yard and my yard. your view is very short sighted.
The incident happened in Vermont, one of the states that allow nursing mothers to breast feed in ANY PUBLIC or PRIVATE location.
Delta is based in Georgia, Georgia law would really have anything to say about it, but they also allow breastfeeding in any public or private location.
Your arguments are weak, and your logic very shortsighted and narrow.
Just accept the fact that you're a Texan with an unhealthy fear of boobs and lacking the self control to look out the window, maybe you could dream about your fantasy in the back row. and i just remembered you remind me of a quote made popluar in two movies.