As I recall in the last thread you trolled in we had that discussion, in addition to the "labs are perfect 'pitbulls' are evil" one. As I also recall, you were completely out-debated and for various reasons many chaz members feel that it is counterproductive to muzzle their dogs. If, for some reason, your memory of that discussion is fuzzy, please refer to the old thread and leave your inane suggestions out of this one.
. . . and Labra WINS in the competition of "tangents completely pointless to the actual topic!"
Who cares if the dogs are aggressive or not? Who cares if they are DA or DR, or have selective DA? Obviously those situations would all have different outcomes, but it's not the point. The point is that all of these dogs are rude, off-leash, and out of their owners' control, and IN ELLA'S FACE, which sets back Chewbecca's training and makes her poor dog flip out when they SHOULD be on a LEASH as per the LAW (are you familiar with that concept?) and under their owners' control.
Wow, a sensible remark out of you for once! No SH!T, sherlock. It's the fault of the irresponsible owners. And, magically, not Rebecca's fault, either! Who'd have guessed?
As has been said previously in this thread everyone has a right to walk with their under-control, leashed dogs and not have other dog's barging into their personal space.
Where did she say
any dog deserves to have its face ripped off? Rebecca made this thread because she was
freaked out that her dog
could have hurt another dog - a little common sense, and, oh, maybe
reading her posts might have provided the truth there instead of making nasty ASSumptions. It's sick you would suggest a dog lover wants other dogs' to "have their faces ripped off."
Now, go stick your snoot in another thread.