Alpha Roll - Dangerous?

smkie

pointer/labrador/terrier
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
55,184
Likes
35
Points
48
#21
The problem I see with timeouts is by the time you get the dog in the crate, he's already forgotten what he did wrong.
I wish to God my Mother would figure that out. FOr years the beagle barks, then she yells no and ties her up under the table. I have tried to explain as far as SAmmy knows my Mother is barking too and doesn't relate the tying up with the act. I told Hyia my grandaughter maybe they could try a different way. SHe could go outside and knock on the door, my mother could anticipate it coming, keep sammy from barking then reward her for not doing it. I don't know if they will do it or not, but i wish they would.
I hate the whole concept of alpha rolls, it is imo completely unecessary and doesnt' do a thing for the partnership that develops between a person and their dog. Good obedience done daily several times will show who the leader is and end up with a better dog. There are no quick fixes.
 

ToscasMom

Harumph™©®
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,211
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Mother Ship
#22
One day when I have a death wish and wish to have my face bitten off in the near future, I will get into the Alpha Roll.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
909
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Indiana
#23
We did this to Wrigley before we necessarily knew any better when he was a pup. Now if he does something wrong and you say "no no" or whatever he will automatically roll onto his back. This isn't to say he is a timid or shy dog at all--. While I wouldn't do it again that way it hasn't hurt Wrigley in any way that I can tell.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#24
Anything that puts a dog into a state of fear causes defensiveness. Putting a dog on the defensive is not only mistreatment, but it's dangerous. Scruffing, grabbing the scruff or muzzle as a punishment is a big, huge mistake. Alpha rolling is based on inaccurate wolf studies which have nothing to do with what they know of wolves today and most certainly nothing to do with domestic dogs. All it tells them is that they might be killed, so you can imagine what a state that can put them in. No, what you did...those few times isn't going to impact your dog if you build trust and use good, sound training methods built on trust and motivation.

Rolling a young puppy or an adult over on his back in play or as a gentle, friendly gesture for a belly rub or other play is not the same thing. Don't confuse that. But rolling a dog over as punishment, with anger and forcefullness is a big, huge mistake. So is grabbing near his neck or face in anger. You want to associate grabbing his collar with a good thing in case you ever have to grab his collar for safety. So, gently hold his collar and feed good treats. Do this like an exercise a few times a day. Gradually build so that you exert a little pressure or pulling, associating it with tasty treats and praise. Then work up to grabbing at it hastily, with pressure, feed and praise. This way if you ever have an emergency and have to grab hard at his collar, he won't turn and bite you, which is apt to happen without this conditioning.

As far as the time outs, I agree that since the time out is of some duration, it is hard to pin point a spot in that duration where it will be connected with the "crime." However, I have found that very short periods of isolation for certain behaviors do get associated with the offense. And that's because the dog is removed from what he loves.....socialability. He is isolated immediately and for only a minute or so. Then returned to the group for another try. The act of walking away, (the very first seconds) from the family group begins the isolation or acts as a conditioned negative punisher...(it signifies what's yet to come and the ending of the good thing) and it happens within 1-3 seconds of a given behavior. So, it is not the duration in and of itself which I think is the effective part of the whole exercise, but rather the conditioned response thing which is really working. Sequence: snarky behavior, immediate removal from the group, which becomes a predictor of a minute or so of boring isolation, (bad thing)... return to the group, reinforcement for good behavior. Repeat as needed. Soon, dog connects that there is a condition: snarky behavior, and a response, leaving the family. Good behavior, stays with family and gets treat. There is a contrast for him to experience if repeated enough times so that more reinforcers can be given for good behavior etc.

For example, Lyric was getting snarky with Jose` for a while when they were in the den with me...that was the only time. Lyric seemed to be possessive of me and/or the den. I quickly marched him into another room, right next to the den, was quiet, but swift. In 1 to 1-1/2 minutes, I invited him back into the den, being very careful of Jose` and watching. I started giving treats while he was being "nice" in association with being in the same room with Jose` and me. It happened a few more times and I repeated the isolation....the leaving the room with his snarky behavior. He hasn't acted that way for months. I watch and continue to give treats intermittently while all dogs are lying down, minding their own business when in the den with me.

So, that's my take on the subject. LOL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#25
Doberluv, that is mine too. I only time out for a max of a min or two. It has worked great with fosters and puppies who are being snarky, or just too obnoxiously rambunctious, or being bitey.

And time outs don't have to be in crates (if they are crated, they have to be in the crate in less than 5 seconds) I can get up and walk to another room. I can pick the dog up, put in bathroom (or nearest room with door) and close door, leaving them for 30 seconds.
 

smkie

pointer/labrador/terrier
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
55,184
Likes
35
Points
48
#26
I would so rather build a reputation with my dog as the person that loves, the person that leads, the person that protects and cares for. IF i am that person then my dog wants to do what i ask of him because we are a team. Growing up as a birdboy, and later a competitor at umpteen field trials i can assure you that the dogs that are bullied into doing their work do not compare to those that are schooled and encouraged.
 

smkie

pointer/labrador/terrier
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
55,184
Likes
35
Points
48
#28
i hope that dog wasn't hurt:( i can't believe they got that on film.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#32
ugg poor dog, I hope it was ok. Doesn't matter if the dog walks away, they could still be in a lot of pain. Heck I have walked away after a really good 'unscheduled dismount' with broken bones.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
17
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Nebraska, land of tractors and cornfields
#35
yes but with a newfound fear for who is supposed to be their guardian and companion.

I do not like alpha rolls at all. When I got my first dog I new nothing about positive training and used this technique. While my dog doesn't seem to hate me for life I firmly believe that she is more timid then she would have been had I known about positive training.

I want to have a relationship with my dogs built on trust and respect, not on dominance. I do not believe in the alpha roll's supposed benefits at all. Look at all the amazing dog and owner teams out there who don't train that way to see what I mean.

Good luck with your dog!
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
27
Likes
0
Points
0
#38
good advice everyone. thank you! i see several people have made the same mistake i have made in regards of positive reinforcement training. i didnt know of that either until i read further on about different sides of the training.

anyway, i also learned new things as well from this. like 5 seconds is the timespan to leave him alone or else he will forget. so i think walkin away is faster than pickin him up to time him out. but earlier today when i was playin with him, my brother was moppin the floor and he ran into the mop with his face as he was chasin the mop and sneezed 4-5 times. i guess he ran into it pretty hard but it wasnt enough for him to yelp or make a sound. is that bad? i was tryin to grab him but he keeps chasin the mop.
 
T

tessa_s212

Guest
#39
As far as the time outs, I agree that since the time out is of some duration, it is hard to pin point a spot in that duration where it will be connected with the "crime." However, I have found that very short periods of isolation for certain behaviors do get associated with the offense. And that's because the dog is removed from what he loves.....socialability. He is isolated immediately and for only a minute or so. Then returned to the group for another try. The act of walking away, (the very first seconds) from the family group begins the isolation or acts as a secondary negative reinforcer...(it signifies what's yet to come and the ending of the good thing) and it happens within 1-3 seconds of a given behavior. So, it is not the duration in and of itself which I think is the effective part of the whole exercise, but rather the conditioned response thing which is really working. Sequence: snarky behavior, immediate removal from the group, which becomes a predictor of a minute or so of boring isolation, (bad thing)... return to the group, reinforcement for good behavior. Repeat as needed. Soon, dog connects that there is a condition: snarky behavior, and a response, leaving the family. Good behavior, stays with family and gets treat. There is a contrast for him to experience if repeated enough times so that more reinforcers can be given for good behavior etc.
I agree. I also use timeouts, but in my use of time outs, never do I shove him in angrily. Simply calmly place them in there for a short while and give them a chance to retry later.

I think the problem occurs only when people start using timeouts as more cruel punishments with the use of yelling, angry tones, and harshly shoving the dog into a crate.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
110
Likes
0
Points
0
#40
i see several people have made the same mistake i have made in regards of positive reinforcement training. i didnt know of that either until i read further on about different sides of the training.
It is good that you are doing extensive researching and stopping after realizing how bad it is. It is ONLY dangerous when the dog is older and you do this. It is only bad now at the time being that you are reinforcing something in a negative manner. He will learn to fear you and you don't want a relationship with anybody, as well as your companion to be fearful.

A relationship should be of trust and love.
earlier today when i was playin with him, my brother was moppin the floor and he ran into the mop with his face as he was chasin the mop and sneezed 4-5 times. i guess he ran into it pretty hard but it wasnt enough for him to yelp or make a sound. is that bad? i was tryin to grab him but he keeps chasin the mop.
I don't think so. Is he acting fine after the incident? (I.E, is he still the way he was? Active, playful?)

Think about it for a moment, if you got hit in the nose it would cause you to sneeze too. It would upset your nose and cause you to automatically sneeze. This has happened to me once before (swimming into the pool next to someone; not a good idea lol). But he should be fine.

I'm not a vet so don't hold me against it though. Most people will tell you that he is fine though.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top