Okay, I was going to add to the latest Cesar thread, but thought better of it.
It seems I'm finding a lot of folks are taking Turid Rugaas' and/or Brenda Aloff's interpretations of canine body language as gospel. Of particular interest is Turid's opinions being embraced as scientific fact regarding "calming signals".
Now, I'm not saying there is no value in either of these opinions, and I'm not saying Cesar's interpretations are spot-on either.
It's just that I've learned more from the dogs (or horses) I've worked with and the "feel" for the communication exchange, than I have from any other human's opinion.
In the end, we really can't say absolutely, IMO.
So, who do you follow and why, or do you have your own interpretation?
It seems I'm finding a lot of folks are taking Turid Rugaas' and/or Brenda Aloff's interpretations of canine body language as gospel. Of particular interest is Turid's opinions being embraced as scientific fact regarding "calming signals".
Now, I'm not saying there is no value in either of these opinions, and I'm not saying Cesar's interpretations are spot-on either.
It's just that I've learned more from the dogs (or horses) I've worked with and the "feel" for the communication exchange, than I have from any other human's opinion.
In the end, we really can't say absolutely, IMO.
So, who do you follow and why, or do you have your own interpretation?