But I would hope your love of dogs would trump your wariness over someone telling you how to confine your dogs.
It's because of my love for dogs that I am wary of a "nobody" telling me how to contain them! Tammy is NOT a VET, she is NOT an Animal Behaviorist nor has she spent years clinically studying containment methods. Her whole premise is based upon HER personal views and is not based on any scientific principles. Of course I'm worried about laymen pushing their agendas. They don't think beyond their "position" and have no regard for factual data.
The whole anti tethering issue is based upon emotional reactions to a perceived problem, not fact. The majority of people who tether their dogs do so humanely, but they are never included in the equation. The whole "Let's punish everyone so as to catch the "few" who abuse," school of thought just does not work for me.
the number one thing still has to be the welfare of the dog....that supersedes private property rights and the failure of bureaucracy.
So your saying that it's ok for
anyone to ignore your privacy/property rights as long as they
"believe" their cause is just? :yikes: So it's ok for Joe Blow up the street to search your property/house because he "thinks" you "might" be doing something wrong?
That's giving society more power than police have!