To be fair, the judge you see give the BOB awards is not the one who judged the bitches. The bitches were judged by a woman. The 2 judges had to agree on BOB, and nobody is sure why Archie went along with the bitch getting that award. When he gets back online, we'll see what he has to say for himself. I irritated some people by saying that I felt that I might give him the benefit of the doubt. If you watch the judging of the BOB, he didn't get much chance to see the bitch move. They moved her very little, and never by herself, the dog was moving at the same time. And the dog and bitch almost collided. So my thought is that he may just not have been observing closely enough to see that the bitch was lame on the day. Of course, everyone is pointing out that if he didn't see, he should have moved her again. I think the tradition there of not necessarily moving the dogs that much makes it too easy to miss something like that.
Or, it could be a crooked decision. Or ignorance of proper gait (which seems unlikely). We'll never really know, but soon we'll at least be able to see what the man has to say for himself. The woman judge, who gave the bitch the CC in the first place, we probably will never know. She doesn't participate in the online community.
It's actually not true that in the US, that couldn't happen. Pirate has been beaten by a lame dog before. Granted, the dog only got Reserve, and didn't go further, but still, a lame dog beat a sound one, and everyone knew he was lame. On Saturday, the judge excused the dog for being lame, on Sunday, he beat my dog. (and his owner ripped into me on FB for saying I didn't like losing to a lame dog. Which wasn't her best choice, since otherwise, nobody would have known who the lame dog was.) And in the US, with the tradition of having the dogs go around the ring at least once to observe side gait, there really isn't an excuse for not seeing lameness.
Oh, and on the Crufts judge stepping back when the bitch jumped on him; it looked to me like she nailed him in the crotch.