Breeding
Becca_ said:
I'm sorry, I still dont get why Sarah wants to see the pedigrees. Is it she wants to see if we have show dog material or more like she can look, laugh and say she couldnt have gotten 50 cents for that dog? After all, like you say, most of us couldnt afford to buy one of her dogs. She gave away puppies that would never make the shows? When I decided I wanted another dog, I would have taken a rescue, I wouldnt have cared what the pedigree said, or if it even had one. My plan has never been to breed or to show, just to love. That's it. To give a good home to a dog.
Maybe it's because some of us have never devoted our life to breeding champion dogs that makes it not so important if there isnt champion blood in their line or if it comes from a kennel known for it's champion bloodlines.I'm not trying to be difficult, and please dont think I'm being huffy because as I sit here typing this, I'm not feeling at all huffy.
I just dont understand why other breeds of puppies are shown and no one ever ask if they can see the pedigree to determine if it was from a recognized breeder known for putting out great dogs.
It is not that some people breed to produce champion dogs. Some breed to preserve the breed, and to build and improve upon it. If only backyard breeders bred Chows, you wouldn't be able to tell if a dog was a Shepherd, a Coyote or supposedly a Chow.
Every breed has a breed standard. Dogs are supposed to be bred to match that standard as closely as possible. If there was a dog in the back of your pedigree that had seizures and had been known to throw seizures, wouldn't you want to know? If there were dogs that had a high rate of cancer, wouldn't you want to know? And if they produced offspring with a high rate of cancer, wouldn't you want to know that? A pedigree is a tool. But it is only of use to those who know how to use the tool. Pet owners know nothing about linebreeding, inbreeding or outcrossing, or when to do which.
It costs just as much to feed and raise a poor dog as it does a good dog. In fact it can cost MORE to raise a poorly bred dog if it happens to have health problems.
However all that is beside the point. I am sure that Sarah wanted to see Leo's pedigree to see what lines were behind him. A friend of mine who bred and showed Dobermans, and who had a Demetrius daughter bred to a top producing champion male happens to be in the background of the first white Doberman. Both George and Barbara were SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To think that after years of careful breeding and loving the breed their dogs would be bastardized in such a way.
So, if you find it an imposition if someone wants to see a pedigree on one of your dogs........then you don't yet understand what a pedigree is. It is no more belittling or insulting than someone asking where your grandparents were from, or what nationalities are in your background.
Of course a pedigree is no use if you don't know how to read it, rofl.
Anyway.........I was wondering if maybe Sarah were curious to see if there were any of the same dogs as in the one she took in for rescue. And nope, she did not give pet puppies away. She gave that dog away just to have a good home for it and to get it off her property. She did not have the space for another dog.
She seldom had any "pet" quality puppies. And she usually had more people waiting for pups than she ever had pups available.
I am going to pass out. Much too hot outside. Still hanging in at 90 degrees. And I still have a ton of stuff to do. These breaks I have to take are making it hard to get anything accomplished!!!!!!! But when you flat run out of ooompf....you gotta come in and cool off!!!!!