Cesar Millan works with Ian Dunbar?!

AllieMackie

Wookie Collie
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
6,598
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ottawa, ON
#21
I have no issue with Ian Dunbar being involved with this book, really. His reasoning is very sound. He's a very logical man.

What I do have an issue with is that Cesar is clearly using this book to tie his name with trainers that vehemently disagree with his practices.
 

JacksonsMom

Active Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
8,694
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Maryland
#22
I think it sounds like an interesting book and I definitely will read it.

I think way too much time and energy is wasted hating different trainers, methods and finding fault in every little thing they do. There are a good number of trainers that overall I don't particularly like or agree with. But, I can't think of a single trainer that I can't take something away from what they do, say or teach from Kohler to Kikospup on youtube and everyone one in between. You don't have to worship or hang on every word of someone to be able to tip your hat and say "I may not have done it that way but by golly it worked"

I like Cesar. I wouldn't approach most things the same way he does but that doesn't mean I flat out dismiss everything he says and does. That's just as bad as blindly following someone without ever questioning or thinking for yourself

But no matter, I'll get off my soap box now. I'm not trying to preach to anyone or debate; this is just something that has weighing on my mind
Totally amen.

Great post. :)
 

DanL

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
3,933
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
61
#23
I have no issue with Ian Dunbar being involved with this book, really. His reasoning is very sound. He's a very logical man.

What I do have an issue with is that Cesar is clearly using this book to tie his name with trainers that vehemently disagree with his practices.
Whether you like his methods or not, Cesar's got a lot of name recognition. Outside of the small world of dog training, Dunbar does not. go up to 10 random people on the street, I bet most know of Milan, and I bet none know of Dunbar.

Maybe it's Dunbar who's trying to get more recognition for himself by associating with Milan with this book?
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#24
But why does everyone assume he does want recognition (he might, but he has done things in the past the indicate that isn't important) He did have his own tv show etc. He is a scientist, not saying that scientists can't want recognition. But most people don't go into science to become celebrities, esp when you go on to get your doctorate. You do that because you want to find answers. Milan seems to be as much if not more about the fame than about the dogs I don't know why its seen as name grabbing on his part. Its like saying a well respected Dr of medicine who writes a piece on health for a quack's (very popular quacks) book is trying to get fame. Perhaps they just want to minimize the quack's damage.

I think its more what Allie said. He is EXTREMELY passionate about humane training and socializing dogs before its a problem. I can totally see him doing this to try to expose people to positive methods.
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#25
I've seen Ian interviewed and have seen him speak and he is a soft spoken, very unassuming gentleman. He does not strike me in any way, shape or form as someone trying to attract attention to himself. Not one bit. In fact, being in public, I see a man who is not terribly comfortable with all that. He is a man who has no reason to get public recognition...from my perspective. I believe he truly wants dogs and their owners to see a superior way to train, to view and interact with their dogs...a way that is in line with the way dogs ARE with humans. I think he wants to counter-act some of the very poor information Milan has been doling out for a long time. Now, that's a man who seems to luxuriate in all the Hollywood glitter. He just oozes with "charm" and public schmooze. And that's the fuel he's running on. So when people buy Mr. Hollywood's books, they'll get some exposure to another viewpoint...one based on the science of dogs, with some real back-up. I'm hoping people will get sick of Milan and how he looks at dogs as a human's opponents and begin to see the way dogs really ARE. People like Dunbar need to come out of the woodwork more.
 

milos_mommy

Active Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
15,349
Likes
0
Points
36
#26
I think Caesar is absolutely terrifying, just because I have seen perfectly mentally stable, friendly, loving dogs become downright fear aggressive in two weeks or so because their owners started watching Caesar. The scary part is, they do listen to the owners out of absolute terror, but I'm just waiting for one of them to rip the face off a child that scares them.

Caesar has come under a lot of criticism in the training world lately, and he could certainly be "using" Dunbar to try and regain some of his credibility.

I really wish more awareness would be raised about how a lot of the things he does are completely wrong, bizarre, and downright dangerous. Sure, he does a lot of things well, but to me that doesn't undo the abusive and dangerous things he teaches, especially when for a lot of people the only training advice they get is by watching "The Dog Whisperer". To me, it seems he thinks that dogs are a) wolves. and b) think that people are also wolves).
 

Angelique

New Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
547
Likes
0
Points
0
#27
I think it sounds like an interesting book and I definitely will read it.

I think way too much time and energy is wasted hating different trainers, methods and finding fault in every little thing they do. There are a good number of trainers that overall I don't particularly like or agree with. But, I can't think of a single trainer that I can't take something away from what they do, say or teach from Kohler to Kikospup on youtube and everyone one in between. You don't have to worship or hang on every word of someone to be able to tip your hat and say "I may not have done it that way but by golly it worked"

I like Cesar. I wouldn't approach most things the same way he does but that doesn't mean I flat out dismiss everything he says and does. That's just as bad as blindly following someone without ever questioning or thinking for yourself

But no matter, I'll get off my soap box now. I'm not trying to preach to anyone or debate; this is just something that has weighing on my mind
Yes. You are wise.

I don't post here very often anymore due to this being an anti-Cesar board, but I have to say I'm reading a lot of good stuff from Ian Dunbar these days. Kudos to him for speaking out and finally addressing some big problems in the dog training profession. It's about time.

Check out his blog: Dr. Ian Dunbar | Dog Star Daily
 

AllieMackie

Wookie Collie
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
6,598
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ottawa, ON
#28
Whether you like his methods or not, Cesar's got a lot of name recognition. Outside of the small world of dog training, Dunbar does not. go up to 10 random people on the street, I bet most know of Milan, and I bet none know of Dunbar.

Maybe it's Dunbar who's trying to get more recognition for himself by associating with Milan with this book?
That's exactly what I meant by "his reasoning is very sound." Dunbar said so himself in the links given earlier in the thread that he's using this as a way to give positive training methods more attention.
 

Danefied

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
1,722
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Southeast
#29
I'll pipe in here since the other thread got totally ignored LOL!

I am honestly torn on this one. On the one hand I wish Millan would just go away. But he has incredible charisma and half of Hollywood behind him, so I don't think he's going anywhere soon. So if he is going to be in the spotlight, I'm glad that at least he had decided to bring lure/reward training, clicker training, and the science of how dogs learn along with him this time.

I sat in B&N the other day and read good chunks of his book. He still misses the mark on a lot of stuff, but he is also giving a fair shake to others' POV. I read most of the chapter on Dunbar, and I was very pleased with both how well lure/reward training was presented and explained, but also how honest the book was about where Dunbar disagrees with Cesar and why.

In an age where trainers make all encompassing statements like "treat training creates aggression" and have entire pages of their websites dedicated to condemning any training that's remotely positive, I appreciate someone with Millan's reach putting the information out there accurately and fairly.

Don't get me wrong, I still got very irritated with some parts, I find it frustrating that he calls his finger pokes "touch" instead of admitting them to be the aversive they are, or that he doesn't seem to understand (or want to admit) that collar pops on a slip lead is not "just" using body language and calm energy.

But I respect and admire Dunbar, and the book also shows much respect and admiration for him too.

You know what struck me the most though? Dunbar taught Millan's dog Junior to sit and down. Millan has had that pup from 8 weeks and at over 2 years when he went to see Dunbar, the dog had never learned to sit on command! And Millan doesn't even appear fazed in the least to admit that!!
 
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
1,309
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
42
#31
I never heard of Dunbar before until reading this thread.

I don't know anything about him but if he really wants to get publicity that doesn't mean he just wants tons of money, IF he is really a good trainer then he is doing it for the well of the dogs and their owner to learn correct ways.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#33
I never heard of Dunbar before until reading this thread.

I don't know anything about him but if he really wants to get publicity that doesn't mean he just wants tons of money, IF he is really a good trainer then he is doing it for the well of the dogs and their owner to learn correct ways.
He was more vested in the 'science' world. Less in the public eye. Also he has said he doesn't want to do any more speaking tours etc. I don't think he wants more 'fame'. I did get to see him during his last speaking tour years ago. One thing I liked is that it was easy to just go up and talk to him on the breaks (it was a two day talk on aggression in pet dogs). I had a nice one on one talk with him about Dekka being attacked by her littermates.
 
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
1,309
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
42
#34
He was more vested in the 'science' world. Less in the public eye. Also he has said he doesn't want to do any more speaking tours etc. I don't think he wants more 'fame'. I did get to see him during his last speaking tour years ago. One thing I liked is that it was easy to just go up and talk to him on the breaks (it was a two day talk on aggression in pet dogs). I had a nice one on one talk with him about Dekka being attacked by her littermates.
I see thanks. :)

Then it would be nice if people see this book as an oportunity for people (mostly owners without too mush experience) to learn good ways of training.

I don't agree with all Cesar metods but at least now I heard of people knowing a dog needs exercise and training from watching the show.

I think is the culture difference but peoeple should take into account Cesar Milan is a latino and as far he don't tell people to punch o kick your dogs , this has chanded the minds of some persons.

Many people here in latin america are like "animals only understand with hits" by many people, as here in latin america many people abuse their dogs by punching of kicking them.


Now I heard somethimes "in the TV there's a guy who says you have to train your dog and that way he will listen to you."
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#35
What he does is better than hitting and kicking, but not by much. He doesn't train his dogs (even he says that).

I found it interesting in Dunbar's TED talk, he briefly touches on the idea that humans default behaviour is to punish. We 'like' to punish as a species. So some charismatic man comes on TV and tells us its ok to punish our dogs (though by jabbing, strangling and shocking as well as intimidation) its going to be accepted by the 'masses'. The problem is that what he promotes (other than the obvious that dogs need exercise... but I mean really if he said dogs need water.. would that also make him a guru lol?) fills rescues and shelters. This is why the American Humane society spoke out against him as well as the American Veterinary Behaviourists. (though the HSUS likes him and has given him an award)

People who already know dogs might be able to dig through the stuff in his books and glean a little something here or there.. but the main issue is he does far more damage than good in the long run. I personally have seen dogs who were fine, and then when people started punishing the dog for their lack of training it (omg the dog is being dominant) the dog started biting. These people had been reffered to good trainer (Ado in fact) but they were so set on the idea that they had to dominate this dog that they wouldn't reward the dog.

I agree with Carrie, the idea that 'rehabbing' a dog is any different than training is silly. Which is why his methods dont' work. What he is doing isn't natural. But I would say after how much evolution, humans controlling the dog's environment and 'owning' the resources is fairly natural.
 

Danefied

New Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
1,722
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Southeast
#36
I found it interesting in Dunbar's TED talk, he briefly touches on the idea that humans default behaviour is to punish. We 'like' to punish as a species.
I do too, and I also find it fascinating where he often talks about how this is not only a way to be with dogs, but with children and spouses too.

Also kind of cool that one more person now knows about Dunbar b/c of this thread :)

For me the real epiphany in dog training came after becoming a mom. Two main reasons. DH and I have agreed before kids that we would not discipline our children physically with began the broadening of my horizons.
Secondly, as the kids grew, I realized that if they were to become involved in the dogs' training, the DOG training could not be based on physical discipline.

Said children are now 8 (twins), and we have a houseful of dogs trained without intimidation or fear who are as well (even better) behaved and reliable than our previous dogs.

But the first step really is to examine yourself and your own biases/motives when training your dog. We ARE a punitive society and we ARE kind of stuck in the mentality that the only way to control behavior is through force, fear, or intimidation. But when you reject that notion, a whole new world of possibilities opens up. Its good stuff :)
 

ihartgonzo

and Fozzie B!
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,903
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Northern California
#37
I had a convo today with a "trainer" at my store that reminded me of this thread... it went like this:

Trainer: *Tsshhhh* (jokingly)
Me: Whoa! Did you just Cesar Millan me?
Trainer: I don't like Cesar Millan!
Me: That's awesome. :) We have something in common!
Trainer: He acts like he's a trainer, but he's not...
Me: Seriously!!! Shutting dogs down in record time is NOT training.
Trainer:....he's like, a behaviorist, you know?
Me: *sigh* :( Not reeeally...

That's such a good point about how people (some people in particular) want to punish. It is called "compulsive" training, after all. It makes my skin crawl to see how some people interact with their dogs... just in the meanest, most obsessive, controlling manner. Why even have a dog? Don't they feel guilt, remorse, or any inkling of care for a very sensitive and intelligent animal? Don't they realize that we are supposed to be much smarter than dogs, and we don't need to use brute force? I doubt that even cavemen treated their dogs like these dominance obsessed barbarians.

The guy that I mentioned earlier, with the Iggy mix who will literally guard the treats that are in YOUR pocket after being "Dog Whisperered" for a year now, used to be one of my closest friends. I thought he was one of the sweetest people in the world. Now I cannot even stand to be in his presence and he has become this cold-hearted person who scares me. I will never forgive my other "friend", who is a complete moron who has never read one single book and believes anything on tv religiously, for corrupting him as soon as they started dating and turning him into a very unhappy person. I know for a FACT that his dog would be a complete gentleman had I "rehabilitated" him with praise and rewards and love.
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#38
Me: Whoa! Did you just Cesar Millan me?
I love that he is now a verb. We frequently use Parelli (as in horse "trainer" Pat Parelli) the same way.

"I just watched her take that horse out and Parelli it for over an hour."
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#39
as an aside. I find it interesting that horse people who see the Parelli's for what they are totally drink the CM koolaid. It never ceases to amaze me.
 
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
1,309
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
42
#40
What he does is better than hitting and kicking, but not by much. He doesn't train his dogs (even he says that).

I found it interesting in Dunbar's TED talk, he briefly touches on the idea that humans default behaviour is to punish. We 'like' to punish as a species. So some charismatic man comes on TV and tells us its ok to punish our dogs (though by jabbing, strangling and shocking as well as intimidation) its going to be accepted by the 'masses'. The problem is that what he promotes (other than the obvious that dogs need exercise... but I mean really if he said dogs need water.. would that also make him a guru lol?) fills rescues and shelters. This is why the American Humane society spoke out against him as well as the American Veterinary Behaviourists. (though the HSUS likes him and has given him an award)

People who already know dogs might be able to dig through the stuff in his books and glean a little something here or there.. but the main issue is he does far more damage than good in the long run. I personally have seen dogs who were fine, and then when people started punishing the dog for their lack of training it (omg the dog is being dominant) the dog started biting. These people had been reffered to good trainer (Ado in fact) but they were so set on the idea that they had to dominate this dog that they wouldn't reward the dog.

I do too, and I also find it fascinating where he often talks about how this is not only a way to be with dogs, but with children and spouses too.

Also kind of cool that one more person now knows about Dunbar b/c of this thread :)

For me the real epiphany in dog training came after becoming a mom. Two main reasons. DH and I have agreed before kids that we would not discipline our children physically with began the broadening of my horizons.
Secondly, as the kids grew, I realized that if they were to become involved in the dogs' training, the DOG training could not be based on physical discipline.

Said children are now 8 (twins), and we have a houseful of dogs trained without intimidation or fear who are as well (even better) behaved and reliable than our previous dogs.

But the first step really is to examine yourself and your own biases/motives when training your dog. We ARE a punitive society and we ARE kind of stuck in the mentality that the only way to control behavior is through force, fear, or intimidation. But when you reject that notion, a whole new world of possibilities opens up. Its good stuff :)
That trainer Dunbar sounds very interesting, nice. :)

I see, hm is hard to notice the effect on shelters when there's no one here. :(

But I can see how some people without too mush experience in dogs can take the wrong idea with the alpha parts.


The last month there was a visit of like 5 people in our house for my father, Pompadour never saw them before and he barked like 4 times, it wasn't an agressive bark but it was like "hey there's five unknown people entering the house"

Then one of them told me that "he is too agressive, he has the house under control, you should watch CM and tame him" :rolleyes: that was a rude thing to say from him, my father told him he is trained and that he was only alerting.

Later I shown them how he can walk on two legs and dance a bit while I'm holding a treat above his nose and they where impressed, hahahaha :D
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top