"It had been proven. Google "Dr. Jean Dodds" and you will find a lot of information on research into vaccines (Not done by the vaccine companies). Also Google "Rabies Challenge Fund" for information on research done on rabies vaccines (again, NOT done by vaccine companies). It seems research done by vaccine producers is woefully lacking.
Find me this Dodds guy in a respectable journal publishment and not Dr. Google and I'll be more inclined to listen. Anyone can put something on the internet, not everyone can get something published, in a legit journal at least. <insert "no way such an edgy scientist will get published in today's scientific world" conspiracy theory here>
And again, I do not doubt that vaccinations last longer than a year, or three years even, hell, I
know they do. But we can only use what the USDA allows us to use, and that's what's been done in studies. Study's that ARE funded by vaccine companies. They have a vested interest in proving their product works to some degree, they're required to, as much as you might like to think they can just slap any old product on the market.
In my state (Georgia) and probably in most states, dogs are considered property and there are no emotional damages or any other damages when neglegence causes the death of a dog other than the replacement cost involved.
And in California, Colorado, and Kansas IIRC this is not the case.
Edit: Nevermind, the California case got
overturned, which, believe it or not, is a good thing. Vets often have to work within people's budgets and can't give the so-called 'Cadillac Package' every time, so it really is innane to be able to sue for emotional damages when it could've been prevented by running pre-op bloodwork, that was declined due to expense, before the surgery.
Thats vet scare talk. Seriously, vaccines do a lot of harm to dogs and the best way out is to do minimum vaccinations. My dogs have already had all the vaccinations they will have in their life. If there are MANY fewer vaccinations that leaves MANY fewer opportunities for bad things to happen
Vet scare talk? Really? Sigh....I'm not even going to debate with you any more, this is ridiculous.
And no, it is not a "grey market" for them. You can purchase them from pretty much any pet related website that does prescriptions for pets.
You have to be licensed to buy vaccines. What happens is the vaccines/products on 'grey area' websites are 'diverted product', meaning that the website contacts a vet, the vet sells the website the product they ordered, and then the website sells it online. This is illegal and the vet, if rooted out, can lose her license. Very much a grey area.
You'd have to screw up by a LONG shot to do that when giving a vaccine. Vaccines are SQ, and so there should be no risk of that happening. At all. Ever.
And yet we've had it happen three times. Owner comes in "I don't know what's wrong, he's lost feeling in that leg after we gave him a vaccination at home!" "How'd you do it?" "We just stuck it in, that's what y'all do right?"
Seriously, I think that veterinarians are overrated.
You need to find a better vet then.
Is your vet AAHA Accredited? If not, maybe you should try one that is. You'll probably be much happier.
Shoot the vets I worked under for the bulk of my experience weren't AAHA accredited and they did exams on every patient that came in that door. She just has a crappy vet. But likely they wouldn't be happy with an AAHA vet either because those are inherently more expensive.