I agree that it was most probably both dogs involved.
If it was something other than the dogs, the truth WILL come out because it's very easy to link the cause of death to that caused by a dog attack. If the child was strangled to death and then the dogs just chewed on the body, that is also easy to find out. Forensic medicine is amazing these days.
While I do think that a 6-wk-old pup would have a hard time pulling a baby from a swing, I don't doubt a Pug could. And most of my friends just invest in those travel swings that sit low on the ground so that's what kind of swing it could've been.
As for euthanizing the pup, I don't think that should've been done at this point b/c I'm more apt to believe the other dog was the true culprit. And yes, if the Pug did it then it should be destroyed. NONE of my dogs have ever even given a dirty or suspicious look towards my baby swing when Cole or Carson has been in it. There are too many good dogs out there to try and adopt out others that killed a baby.
And what a horrible, tragic case.
I can't even imagine what that poor baby went through. And where in hell did those parents really go that they could not hear a 2-month-old screaming for his life.....literally! I can promise you they weren't in that house like they claim and if they were, they would've had to have been so heavily under the influence of drugs and alcohol that they don't need children.
Again, the true moral of the story is that children are not disposable creatures that you can just throw in a corner and leave them alone. And if you must leave your child unattended for a minute or so, then by all means put the dogs up! Cole is 2-yrs-old and still has not been left alone in a room with any of the dogs.........so it's not that hard to do. Extra effort? Yes. Hard? No.