Nope, this one is not great. I see nothing about the importance of bones and organs in this. It blah blahs along about veggies which is not something that is integral to the dogs daily needs
I noticed that too, when talking about meat it only mentions ground turkey... that leaves a LOT of the equation out.
azpoochluvr, this article appeals to what people *think* dogs should have in their diet, but the diet described is far from what a dog actually needs. In fact, for adding so much that the dog does NOT need, they left out some very vital factors to any raw diet. Where is the calcium coming from? They claim carrots!? That in itself is a reason to disregard the article.
While dogs might benefit from some veggies, (it's hotly debated) they certainly don't need grain, and the proportions in this "recipe" are nonsense. Most experts in raw diets say that a dog needs no more than 15% vegetable matter, IF they are to be included at all.
Also, recommending to feed the amount you currently feed in kibble? How very vague. Everyone who's done any reading on raw knows the golden rule is 2-3% of your dogs body weight in food a day. What if they were feeding garbage kibble that required them to feed their 60lb dog 4-5 cups of kibble? Feeding that much fresh, raw food would lead to diarrhea due to over feeding!
Basically, what we're all saying is that if you're looking for resources on raw feeding, this article isn't a good one.
