yuckaduck said:
Look at the hard facts, oil oil oil, if it truely was about the chemical weapons then the UN would have acted and supported the
invasion.
I lied, I cannot just sit back and let the LIE go. Will you stop it with the UN. WHY do we need the UN's approval for ANYTHING. It is the most worthless organization on Earth.
If it was about Oil, please explain current prices? We get ZERO oil from Iraq. ZERO.
There and many in the UN that do not like the US. I would think they would go out of their way to harm our intrests. For instance, why does France have a permanent seat on he security council? What do they know about that?
If it truely was about the weapons of mass destruction then where are they.
How many times do I have to say it? I listen and try to respond to YOUR arguements, please say something about mine. The intelligence on ths issue was most likely faulty. It was most likely a mistake. BUT, Bush's predecessors made the SAME arguement. The SAME EXACT ONE. Is a person lying if they truely believe what they are saying?
Also, it is possible that they were destroyed or moved to, say, Syria....
It was an invasion and the inocennt people, troops, men, women, children dying for the US to gain more oil is completely wrong. The US government is worse then Iraq!
Cool you just personally insulted me, so I can do the same back...
But I am not going to, because it would just give you something else to whine about and ignore the arguement.
<insert, "how did I insult you" question here> I would not expect you to understand just how much you PERSONALLY insulted me in that post.