The war

Do you agree with the war?

  • No

    Votes: 33 71.7%
  • Yes

    Votes: 13 28.3%

  • Total voters
    46

Melissa_W

New Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
4,290
Likes
0
Points
0
andy. said:
exactly, the majority were from a different county and even if they were from Iraq it doesn’t mean the whole country is responsible

What if the 7/7 bombers in London (who were British by the way) had chosen an American city would the US be at war with us? lol
Yes, a vast majority were Saudi.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
yuckaduck said:
Look at the hard facts, oil oil oil, if it truely was about the chemical weapons then the UN would have acted and supported the
invasion.
I lied, I cannot just sit back and let the LIE go. Will you stop it with the UN. WHY do we need the UN's approval for ANYTHING. It is the most worthless organization on Earth.

If it was about Oil, please explain current prices? We get ZERO oil from Iraq. ZERO.

There and many in the UN that do not like the US. I would think they would go out of their way to harm our intrests. For instance, why does France have a permanent seat on he security council? What do they know about that?

If it truely was about the weapons of mass destruction then where are they.
How many times do I have to say it? I listen and try to respond to YOUR arguements, please say something about mine. The intelligence on ths issue was most likely faulty. It was most likely a mistake. BUT, Bush's predecessors made the SAME arguement. The SAME EXACT ONE. Is a person lying if they truely believe what they are saying?

Also, it is possible that they were destroyed or moved to, say, Syria....

It was an invasion and the inocennt people, troops, men, women, children dying for the US to gain more oil is completely wrong. The US government is worse then Iraq!
Cool you just personally insulted me, so I can do the same back...

But I am not going to, because it would just give you something else to whine about and ignore the arguement.

<insert, "how did I insult you" question here> I would not expect you to understand just how much you PERSONALLY insulted me in that post.
 
Y

yuckaduck

Guest
Puckstop31 said:
I lied, I cannot just sit back and let the LIE go. Will you stop it with the UN. WHY do we need the UN's approval for ANYTHING. It is the most worthless organization on Earth.

If it was about Oil, please explain current prices? We get ZERO oil from Iraq. ZERO.

There and many in the UN that do not like the US. I would think they would go out of their way to harm our intrests. For instance, why does France have a permanent seat on he security council? What do they know about that?



How many times do I have to say it? I listen and try to respond to YOUR arguements, please say something about mine. The intelligence on ths issue was most likely faulty. It was most likely a mistake. BUT, Bush's predecessors made the SAME arguement. The SAME EXACT ONE. Is a person lying if they truely believe what they are saying?

Also, it is possible that they were destroyed or moved to, say, Syria....



Cool you just personally insulted me, so I can do the same back...

But I am not going to, because it would just give you something else to whine about and ignore the arguement.

<insert, "how did I insult you" question here> I would not expect you to understand just how much you PERSONALLY insulted me in that post.

I am sorry if my opinion insults but it must hold some merit if it did.


This is what the entire war was based on that one word. I am also sorry if you feel the UN is useless, to me it is in place for a reason and I am glad it is. I believe their approval is the only justification for the war, without their approval it was an invasion plain and simple. The UN was put in place to fullfill the hopes and dreams of so many world war II soldiers, all those who lost their lives for our freedom and our rights. They vowed Never Again and the UN was to preserve that with in reason or at least make sure there was a darn good reason.

In My Opinion, there was not a darn good reason, there was no reason to ignore the UN. Whether you like it or not that is my opinion.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
yuckaduck said:
I am sorry if my opinion insults but it must hold some merit if it did.
Bull****... It holds ZERO merit.

ZERO, just like you. ZERO.

How DARE you insult the brave men and women dying everyday so you can sit here and cry like a 5 year old?

Don't you dare take the moral high road on me.

Of course, argue my style, not the facts. Typical.
 
Y

yuckaduck

Guest
Puckstop31 said:
Bull****... It holds ZERO merit.

ZERO, just like you. ZERO.

How DARE you insult the brave men and women dying everyday so you can sit here and cry like a 5 year old?

Don't you dare take the moral high road on me.

Of course, argue my style, not the facts. Typical.

I could careless about your style. I am arguing the facts. Get off your high horse, it ain't all about you.

Thanks not like you are the first one to call me a zero. Hell my parents did that my whole life. If I wish to be called that again I will go home, not come to a dog forum.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
yuckaduck said:
In My Opinion, there was not a darn good reason, there was no reason to ignore the UN. Whether you like it or not that is my opinion.
IMHO, ignoring the UN is a good thing. Why should ANY soverign nation have to ask anybody to act in their National Intrest? Your faith in the UN will make you a SLAVE. All the UN does is make words. Words are as useless as a liberal.
 
Y

yuckaduck

Guest
Puckstop31 said:
OK, I am really done with this now. My blood pressure can't take it any more.

History will indeed be the ultimate judge.
You can keep arguing do not worry you will not get another post from me here. I know where to draw the line and it has been drawn now.
 

andy.

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
90
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
England
It was an invasion and the inocennt people, troops, men, women, children dying for the US to gain more oil is completely wrong. The US government is worse then Iraq!
Yeah the death toll (just for civilians is at a Minimum of 26797 and maximum 30163, and the US military has lost 2,035 troops because of this "war", is that worth it?
America is worse than Iraq, of course Iraq has some bad people, but America definitely does :(
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
LMFAO would you all get off the oil kick. HOW CAN IT BE ABOUT OIL? They get NO oil from Iraq and less than 4% of the nations oil supply from the middle east as a whole. You can seriously sit there and tell me it is about oil when we get that little amount. THAT is just an excuse to justify your opinions. Everytime I get into this discussion with someone that shares the opposite opinion it never fails that OIL will be brought up. FIND SOMETHING ELSE

Andy: everywhere has bad people. It's just human nature. Some are just worse than others. I would like to see how everyone would react if bush just sat back and waited for them to come after the US. THEN everyone would be screaming "OH he didn't do anything to protect us what a jerk. He just let the military sit there and waste our tax dollars while we get attacked. why didn't he something about it when he had the chance" I can just hear it now

ALWAYS playing the victims tsk tsk
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
bubbatd said:
Ah truce !!! I'm waving the white flag !

I don't have a white flag. Will a shirt on a stick do :D I have some white underwear but I am sure no one wants to see that lol
 

Melissa_W

New Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
4,290
Likes
0
Points
0
Puckstop31 said:
Trained in Afghanistan and funded by alot of nations, POSSIBLY Iraq, among others.
Puck, "possibly" is not good enough for me. But, you know where I stand ideologically. And I'm sure you're not dumb enough to argue ideology with someone. ;) I respect you because you know your facts. We just didn't come to the same conclusions based on the facts.
 

andy.

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
90
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
England
can somebody please outline the reasons for the war to me? and things like "for freedom" can you please state exactly how it would achieve freedom? Thanks!

Things have got VERY of track and we might finally now be able to get this discussion back to a proper debate not just a barrage of insults :D
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
I didn't see it get very off track due to insults. I saw it get off track because we were talking about a movie and chit chatting in between. which is fine with me :D

Anyway how can you say that they aren't acheiving freedom over there? They just had a real election a REAL vote. It may not mean much to you but it sure means a heck of a lot to them. We take freedom for granted because it is all we have ever known. Something as simple as voting and having free elections may not seem like much to us. It is something we have always had the right to do. They didn't have that right. Freedom does not happen over night and I think they have done a HELL of a job getting saddam out of power and getting them on the right track to democracy. I say congratulations to the troops over there fighting so hard for someone else. I have friends over there and I REFUSE to sit here and believe that they are over there in vain. They believe in what they are fighting for and I do to.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
3,317
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Florida
President Bush isn't the blame for the war. He was forced by our congress to make the call. The Congress declares war and yeilded that right and privledge to President Bush. (both republicans and democrats passed that responsibility) Faced with the same intellegence that was offered to President Bush at that time, I probably would have done the same thing.
Fact: The Congress didn't have the guts to make the call rather give it to one man so they could lay the blame come on someone else down the road.
Be sure to vote for your senator and your representatives and you can make a huge difference. So it is ultimately our fault (us citizens), for putting wimps in the Congress.

Hard to discount oil as a huge incentive for war. But the fact is it is just ONE element that was considered. History shows that war is caused by a number of issues, never just one. Also, one may check out the huge contracts and oil deals that France, Germany, and Russia amoung others had with Daddy Saddam. Not to mention Saddam's plan to move Iraq's currency to the Euro. Ecomonic war is also offensive. But I don't blame them either, just like our country's dealings with Saddam. To do any business or have any influence in Iraq, you had to deal with Saddam, it is like that in alot of countries with dictators.

The U.N., if given a vote for every country to handle international issues would be a huge failure. Just count the countries and see how stacked up it is and has been. That is why they created the Security Council. Major powers would lose every vote without it, hardly fair :)

Chazhound
 

andy.

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
90
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
England
sparks19 said:
I didn't see it get very off track due to insults. I saw it get off track because we were talking about a movie and chit chatting in between. which is fine with me :D

Anyway how can you say that they aren't acheiving freedom over there? They just had a real election a REAL vote. It may not mean much to you but it sure means a heck of a lot to them. We take freedom for granted because it is all we have ever known. Something as simple as voting and having free elections may not seem like much to us. It is something we have always had the right to do. They didn't have that right. Freedom does not happen over night and I think they have done a HELL of a job getting saddam out of power and getting them on the right track to democracy. I say congratulations to the troops over there fighting so hard for someone else. I have friends over there and I REFUSE to sit here and believe that they are over there in vain. They believe in what they are fighting for and I do to.

Thanks, that does seem like a good cause to me :), but most of the reasons that have come along are revenge for 9/11 and for WMD’s so where do they fit in? also if it was just about getting freedom for the Iraqi people why couldn’t Saddam have just been killed? Why have so many innocent people had to die? I agree that things are getting better for the people of Iraq but it has also created many more terrorists as well.

But then why was there a campaign to got the American people to believe that it was Iraqs fault that 9/11 happened and would this war have occurred without 9/11? The reasons for this was are really unclear to me, The freedom of the people of Iraq is something that is very important, but it seems to me like it is an excuse for going to war.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top