The show dogs that impressed you the most

SizzleDog

Lord Cynical
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
9,449
Likes
0
Points
0
#41
I'm curious (and really not trying to be snarky about it) - do you think that is really an option in all breeds at this point in time? Now, I'd guess from my limited knowledge of Rottis (limited pretty much to admiring your dogs here) that Rottis do exist who can perform well in the show ring and also perform the tasks they were originally bred for. I'm willing to bet there are other breeds like that; ones that haven't been dramatically altered for the show ring.

But there are some breeds where I really don't see how it is possible because of physical changes. The Clumber still stands out in my head from the pictures of dogs in the early 1900's that were posted. I housesat for 2 Clumbers a while ago, and they looked a lot like the ones I've seen at shows. They could barely move or breathe, and were so heavy-headed they looked like their eyes were squintly. I can't imagine them being able to actually go out and hunt - which I can totally see the ones in the old pictures doing. If someone walked into a show ring with a Clumber that did actually fit the standard, but wasn't the extreme version that I assume wins - would they not be laughed out of the ring?

Obviously it's an extreme version, and the one always used in this sort of argument, but what if someone starting breeding English Bulldogs back to a working build? If they could still keep the dogs purebred (obviously this would take ages, so it's really just a 'what if'), and keep the dog within standard, how would the show world receive them? Is there enough flexibility in the standards to actually permit that?

I'd be interested in anyone's opinion on this, although Red - you usually give really good answers to these sorts of questions!

I'm also curious about the breeds whose purpose has become obsolete (or illegal), to the point where the breed has been transformed into a breed that has little to no chance of even doing its original jab.... how many people hunt birds with nets anymore? Should English Setter people be out catching birds with nets?
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#42
None of the Champion Goldens I've known in the past would ever get a second glance today !!!
 

sammgirl

ACoops favorite
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
845
Likes
0
Points
0
#43
My mom used to show keeshonden, and so i've always grown up with those guys, and think they're beautiful dogs.

However, I saw a show and watched this samoyed literally float around the ring. His head was stunning. Gorgeous coat. Movement like water. And right then I fell in love with the samoyed.

I did some research, and found that they were more versatile then the keesies, and then I realized that these dogs were a breed I could really live with.

Of course, my mom will be forever stuck on her keesies and thinks that sammies are too big and boisterous, but I'm totally sold on them.

I can't wait until i get my own puppy.
 

LauraLeigh

Active Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
3,752
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Brighton Ontario
#44
And what exactly to you expect people with companion breed to do? How are we supposed to prove for excellence? This sort of snotty attitude against showing really gets my goat! :mad:
We all know that you think our dogs are inferior to yours because they are just "decorations". My dog is a wonderful example of his breed and does what he was bred to do, be my best friend and be very very happy doing it.

Anyway, the show dog that most impressed me.


Again, totally biased! LOL!

As much as I hate what the ring can do to a working breed, when the breeders ignore the job the dogs were meant for... Not all do, and good on them, but many do...

However, with companion breeds... I have always wondered that myself about the bolded part above......???

ETA... LOL should have read the whole thread, Ado summed up how I feel pretty well...
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#45
I'm not against showing but feel it's the show ring that has ruined many of the breeds . I'm all for Field Work and Obedience where the puff and fluff doesn't matter and the brain clicks in to what they were bred for .
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
790
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Houston, TX
#46
I'm also curious about the breeds whose purpose has become obsolete (or illegal), to the point where the breed has been transformed into a breed that has little to no chance of even doing its original jab.... how many people hunt birds with nets anymore? Should English Setter people be out catching birds with nets?
They've evolved from something that lays down on birds to standing staunchly and pointing. Their job has evolved so the breed has as well.
 

SizzleDog

Lord Cynical
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
9,449
Likes
0
Points
0
#47
You're exactly right, happyhound. I wonder what other breeds have had their jobs evolve... what jobs have become obsolete, and which jobs have evolved but our definition of "work" has not?

Just something interesting to think about. :)
 

Beanie

Clicker Cult Coordinator
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
14,012
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Illinois
#48
If someone walked into a show ring with a Clumber that did actually fit the standard, but wasn't the extreme version that I assume wins - would they not be laughed out of the ring?

Obviously it's an extreme version, and the one always used in this sort of argument, but what if someone starting breeding English Bulldogs back to a working build? If they could still keep the dogs purebred (obviously this would take ages, so it's really just a 'what if'), and keep the dog within standard, how would the show world receive them? Is there enough flexibility in the standards to actually permit that?
You are absolutely and totally correct that there are breeds where the show ring version is completely different than the original or working version, and there are breeds where that division doesn't totally exist yet but is definitely growing, like a chasm opening up between the two types (like shelties.)
And yeah, it would take a lot of work to get a breed back to where it used to be and AWAY from ring trends that have damaged breeds. GSDs are going through that right now, though. Do I think it's worth going through all that work? Yup, absolutely and ESPECIALLY when it comes to working breeds. It IS an idea of form following function, not form following whatever the ring trend happens to be. Since shelties are "my breed" I will say the most annoying thing in the world is watching show shelties with terrible movement. Movement is supposed to be part of the dog and part of the standard, and it is far too often that I don't see correct movement. It makes me furious, actually, because proper sheltie movement is beautiful. Auggie has people - just Average Joes, not even sheltie people or herding breed people or whatever - commenting ALL THE TIME on his movement, and he's not even a show dog. He just moves the way a sheltie should, and it's striking to them because they do not see it often if at all.


We had a discussion on here a while back about what would happen if working bred BCs walked into a confo ring. Laughed out? Maybe. But I would still really, really like to see it. And why the heck not? That's what a border collie should be. Shelties are the same way. Why pull out and just leave the show ring to the floofy, tubby waddling imitations of wonderful, beautiful WORKING shelties? Then you're rolling over and allowing the breed to be dominated by the very thing that is the problem. Taking your ball and going home isn't the answer 99% of the time. Fighting for what's correct is.
No, there probably isn't enough flexibility in the standard to allow for more correct/less ring-trendy dogs to be allowed in the ring. That's a problem and one I think should be fixed. As to how things would be recieved in the show world... that's more of a public opinion kind of problem than problems with KCs or specific breeds, I think. I also think as long as you have breeders who care about nothing but breeding to a ring trend just so they can win in the confo ring and they care about nothing else, you will have a problem. But stupid people will always exist and I have never been a believer in pandering to the lowest common denominator.


I don't know what the answer is but I don't think giving up on having everything is. And for breeds that have gotten off track or are going on track, I think we need more people determined to not give up before any good is going to come of it.

For breeds where their purpose is companionship or breeds where their original function is no longer something they can do - no, it's not like you can make a dog that originally was supposed to bring down a bull go bring one down before you go "Okay, he's good and worthy of being bred!" There's a lot more than goes into it. But it's the same for me with herding breeds. Of course I don't insist on a) herding ability and b) conformation. Overall temperament and health also go into the measure of a dog. So I think there's still a lot to be examined and strive for in a breed where they can no longer perform their original function, or where the original function is to be a wonderful companion dog.


I'm just rambling, LOL. I have a lot of thoughts on this and there are a lot of problems in many breeds. It's an uphill battle for most. I think what Red really means (and the bottom line of what I mean, anyway) is that you can't just only look at one aspect... no matter WHAT that aspect is. You should be breeding for the total package at all times. There are lots and lots of things that go into that and it's different for different breeds.
That's just how I feel. I recognize that I am lucky enough to love a breed where you can still find dogs that live on a farm and herd during the day, and can also go win in the show ring on the weekend... and that not all breeds are so lucky. But I also fear that my breed, like others have in the past, will too divide. I see no reason for a division. We CAN have it all!! So why shouldn't we WANT to have it all?
(more rambling la la laaaaa ending post now before it gets any longer)
 

Tahla9999

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
1,105
Likes
0
Points
36
#49
Why must this always turn into working versus show. She asked what show dogs impressed you. If you don't like show dogs, why respond and turn the thread blowing in another direction?


Favorite UKC American Pit Bull Terrier, Trinity.

GR CH Trinity

Just beautiful!!! :D
 

bbkng

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
52
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Montreal, Canada
#50
I'm not typically a fan of red merle, but Las Rocosa is one of the founding kennels of "red dogs" and they, along with Fairoaks, seem to do it right. Nice deep color, no washing out.


Wow..Las Rocosa's Little Wolf is one striking beauty.

I wish i could own a "real" working line Aussie. Maybe one day:)
 

SizzleDog

Lord Cynical
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
9,449
Likes
0
Points
0
#51
Why must this always turn into working versus show. She asked what show dogs impressed you. If you don't like show dogs, why respond and turn the thread blowing in another direction?
I wonder that too. Ah well, such is life.
 

SizzleDog

Lord Cynical
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
9,449
Likes
0
Points
0
#52
Ya know, I might as well answer the question.

Probably my favorite Doberman of all time... Ch. Dictator V Glenhugel.


Probably a close second... Ch. Teraden's The Chocolate Soldier...


Ch. BJF The Phantom Tollbooth CD UCD ROM, a dog that I've recently become VERY interested in...


And of course, my favorite show dog for purely personal reasons...
 

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#53
Kirby :)
this picture doesn't do him justice AT ALL. he was the westminster 1999 winner, he was bouncy and happy and just had a confident "IM GONNA WIN THIS" strut!
he just made me smile and clap out loud when he won!

 

protodog

New Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
154
Likes
0
Points
0
#54
*is jealous that Romy knows Cooper*

I've been really impressed by Coburn's Tia Maria


Unfortunately, I can't find a good stacked picture of her, but she is drop-dead gorgeous.
 

puppydog

Tru evil has no pantyline
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
7,500
Likes
0
Points
0
#55
puppydog
i don't think i was being snotty at all. the OP asked what SHOW dogs had impressed us. I have YET to be impressed by any showdog (in all fairness i don't attend shows except in conjunction w/ working events so that dramatically affects my chances of being impressed) unless i have already seen them working. the OP also used the words grace, power & strength. it is a widely propagated fallacy that conformation breeding in general retains health & function and the OPs use of such language promotes this. i simply used examples to show that it requires something a little more physically demanding than trotting around a ring to properly display the listed physical attributes. (FTR poor breeding is poor breeding and there have been plenty of people breeding "working" dogs that were simply producing crap) i do not doubt in the least that showing can be mentally stressful.
i personally do not believe in breeding working breeds soley for the show ring. i do not believe it is fair to any breed to change it's inherent personality to fit the showring. i understand the original personality of many breeds made them unsuitable for the general public. perhaps the genral public and the show only community should leave those dogs where they belong, in the hands of working dogmen (& working dogwomen). however i would never attempt to force others to live by these convictions as i also strongly believe in the rights of the individual to do as they see fit as long as they do not harm another.
i freely admit there are many in the working community who will jump at every opportunity to aggressively attack the destructive results associated w/ show only breeding. there are just as many who will argue just as aggressively & ignorantly about the moral superiority of the show breeder. i do not feel i crossed into this area of stupidity. i will however strongly correct people for misrepresenting the working ability of breeds who no longer are tried (let alone proven) in their appropriate fields of endeavor.
Hi Pops. I never said you had a snotty attitude. I know that you prefer working dogs and that is your choice entirely. It is the attitude displayed by OC towards people who choose companion breeds that gets me upset. She seems to think that our dogs are less worthy because they don't work.
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#56
*is jealous that Romy knows Cooper*

I've been really impressed by Coburn's Tia Maria


Unfortunately, I can't find a good stacked picture of her, but she is drop-dead gorgeous.
Not only do I know him, I got to hold his lead once while his handler showed me how to gait Strider. *dies*

Wooo, she's a good looking girl. I haven't met her in person yet. Seeing them run is the best.
 
R

RedyreRottweilers

Guest
#58
I'm not against showing but feel it's the show ring that has ruined many of the breeds . I'm all for Field Work and Obedience where the puff and fluff doesn't matter and the brain clicks in to what they were bred for .
A show ring or a dog show or a registry cannot ruin ANYTHING. Breeders, and the decisions THEY MAKE are responsible for the directions a breed takes. Not any ring or any competition.
 

Laurelin

I'm All Ears
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
30,963
Likes
3
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Oklahoma
#60
Kirby :)
this picture doesn't do him justice AT ALL. he was the westminster 1999 winner, he was bouncy and happy and just had a confident "IM GONNA WIN THIS" strut!
he just made me smile and clap out loud when he won!

Ah shoot, I forgot him. I'm not sure how. Great dog, sad story. :( Imo his story doesn't show the best of the show world at all, and his win had some bad consequences. After his win, papillons doubled in popularity and that was the start of them becoming another 'puppy mill breed'. No one had heard of them before he won.

He himself was a fantastic dog though. His son, Nemo, was great too, but no other could match up to Kirby. I was so sad when he passed away. He was still winning a year earlier as a veteran and taking everything over the younger dogs. We won't have another him.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top