PixieSticksandTricks said:
Okay im going to ask all you "tattoo peoples" opinions. This summer im getting a couple peircings done and I was thinking about getting a small tattoo alittle bigger then a dime or penny. I would like to get it at the back of neck kind of between my shoulder blades. But I just wanted opinions on where you think is the least painful spot to get a tattoo. And no I am not interested on tattoo peircings. Because no offence to women on here who have them but I think tattoos on womens arms look trashy.
So im open for opinions.
Ok well on the piercings, I wouldn't get more than one until it's fully healed. It takes alot out of your body to heal a piercing and having more than one fresh one is asking for trouble eg, infection, rejection etc.
If you want a tattoo that small it has to have little to no detail whatsoever. Because of two reasons, most artists won't do work that small because it's just too hard and the second reason being, they won't do work that small because they know in two or three years it will just spread together and look like a mess and they won't want there name on something that looks like garbage. I think the least painful spot to get one would be your butt, or your calf. The ones on my hips killed, and the one on my back wasn't too back, but still hurt.
Edit to say: after I'm married, I will start working on a full sleeve. I think it depends on who you are, whether or not it looks trashy. I think the wrong work does look trashy on a womans arm, but something beautiful is just that, beautiful.
Grammy, to your comment about people in power not sporting tattoos and piercings, in our generation I beleive they will have them. It's so mainstream to have some kind of body art that almost everyone I know my age has at least 1 body piercing. The times, they are a changin'!
