Sports Illustrated featuring pit bull on the cover!

Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
#21
It is funny how they still left the leash on the dog. It just takes away from the picture. What are they afraid of, that the dog will jump and bite the camera guy? Pit bulls are just one misunderstood breed. They are bred for one thing, and that is to protect their family. Too bad they are banned in so many places.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! Pit Bulls are among the worst choices for family protection. A well bred Pit Bull has iron in-bred inhibitions against aggression toward humans.

And yes, they ARE one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented and maligned breeds in existence. And there are a lot of people out there purposely fomenting those misrepresentations to try to ensure that they cease to exist.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#22
It is funny how they still left the leash on the dog. It just takes away from the picture. What are they afraid of, that the dog will jump and bite the camera guy? Pit bulls are just one misunderstood breed. They are bred for one thing, and that is to protect their family. Too bad they are banned in so many places.

I can't answer why they left the leash on, but my guess is that the nice green of the leash adds a pretty contrast to the color of the dog and the background. And to me it also implies a dog willing and ready to go a nice stroll whenever you say the word.

I don't feel it takes away from the picture.

They might not be afraid of anything. What's with the assumption?

And alas, I get to the real reason of my response. "Pit Bulls", more specifically the American Pit Bull Terrier (just 1 of the 4 'pit bull' breeds), were not, are not, and should never be bred for protection. I'm not sure where you got your information from, but the history of the breed is firm and doesn't vary.

The sad part is that many just refuse to accept the history of the breed because they personally find it morally wrong and possibly repulsive. But no matter one's feelings on the subject, history is what it is and you cannot change it just to satisfy one's morals & values.

The American Pit Bull Terrier, a dog derived from the bull & terrier cross pitdog from Europe, was bred specifically for dog fighting in the pit. It was designed to be the best pitdog of all the dogs currently being used as fighting dogs.

In addition to be a pitdog, it was still a family dog. Historical references point out cases of where a dog was matched late in the evening, cleaned up, and then allowed to rest the night away in the bed with the children.

It was a dog designed to be a human-friendly animal capable of being man's best friend and another pitdog's worst enemy. And it excelled.

It was this breeding specifically for the pit that gave us the even-tempered, good natured, clown-of-a-dog today that we call the APBT.

Never was the American Pit Bull Terrier bred to be a guard dog or a protection dog. Ever. In fact, the dogs had to be used to handling my strangers as before each match the opposing dog's owner would wash down the dog and of course a referee was involved in a match and who would want to do that with a HA dog? In a match, dogs are actually handled quite a lot. That's a lot to ask of a dog who is worked up and has only one thing on it's mind.

The reputation of the APBT took a turn for the worse after the HSUS intervened in the 1970's and begin producing mass publications proclaiming lies and falsehoods as "truths." Thanks to their unwanted attention, the APBT found a new market with the thugs and drug dealers gangbangers who were quite impressed with the wonder dog who feels no pain and can eat glass and ingest gunpowder with little to no ill effects. Thus the dogs began finding their way into the hands of these people who in addition to using them as penis extensions and intimidation factors, began to breed and peddle the dogs to anyone with cash.

Now, I do understand that those people had to get the dogs from somewhere, and never once did you hear me state that all those who owned APBTs back in the day were reputable people, but the fact remains that when the dogs were pitdogs and family dogs belonging to the agerage Joe, we didn't have the problems that we have today.

As for being banned kudos to BSL, BSL exists because of irresponsible owners who think it's ok for Foofy to go to the dog park and that it's ok for Fido to go run outside, unleashed, to do his business on the front lawn...or even the neighbors front lawns. It exists because people have turned the breeding of these dogs into a job and a lifestyle and only care about the money that it brings in. They could care less who they actually sell the dogs to. BSL exists because people who have unfortunately obtained a 'pit bull' with a less than stellar temperament keep making excuses for it (it was abused, it wasn't fed much, it wasn't petted much as a puppy.....boohoo) until the day it makes national headlines when it plants it's canines into the wrong person who actually reports it.

In short, BSL was caused and is caused by irresponsible and unreputable 'pit bull' owners. And the vast majority of these would've never even owned the dogs had the HSUS not started with their **** back in the day. In a few short years, the HSUS turned these dogs into one of the hottest commodities to hit the market since weed and cocaine and in return, they've gained a never-ending influx of donations that have only served to buy mansions and jets and expensive cars for the employees.
 

Boxer100

New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
337
Likes
0
Points
0
#26
I can't answer why they left the leash on, but my guess is that the nice green of the leash adds a pretty contrast to the color of the dog and the background. And to me it also implies a dog willing and ready to go a nice stroll whenever you say the word.

I don't feel it takes away from the picture.

They might not be afraid of anything. What's with the assumption?

And alas, I get to the real reason of my response. "Pit Bulls", more specifically the American Pit Bull Terrier (just 1 of the 4 'pit bull' breeds), were not, are not, and should never be bred for protection. I'm not sure where you got your information from, but the history of the breed is firm and doesn't vary.

The sad part is that many just refuse to accept the history of the breed because they personally find it morally wrong and possibly repulsive. But no matter one's feelings on the subject, history is what it is and you cannot change it just to satisfy one's morals & values.

The American Pit Bull Terrier, a dog derived from the bull & terrier cross pitdog from Europe, was bred specifically for dog fighting in the pit. It was designed to be the best pitdog of all the dogs currently being used as fighting dogs.

In addition to be a pitdog, it was still a family dog. Historical references point out cases of where a dog was matched late in the evening, cleaned up, and then allowed to rest the night away in the bed with the children.

It was a dog designed to be a human-friendly animal capable of being man's best friend and another pitdog's worst enemy. And it excelled.

It was this breeding specifically for the pit that gave us the even-tempered, good natured, clown-of-a-dog today that we call the APBT.

Never was the American Pit Bull Terrier bred to be a guard dog or a protection dog. Ever. In fact, the dogs had to be used to handling my strangers as before each match the opposing dog's owner would wash down the dog and of course a referee was involved in a match and who would want to do that with a HA dog? In a match, dogs are actually handled quite a lot. That's a lot to ask of a dog who is worked up and has only one thing on it's mind.

The reputation of the APBT took a turn for the worse after the HSUS intervened in the 1970's and begin producing mass publications proclaiming lies and falsehoods as "truths." Thanks to their unwanted attention, the APBT found a new market with the thugs and drug dealers gangbangers who were quite impressed with the wonder dog who feels no pain and can eat glass and ingest gunpowder with little to no ill effects. Thus the dogs began finding their way into the hands of these people who in addition to using them as penis extensions and intimidation factors, began to breed and peddle the dogs to anyone with cash.

Now, I do understand that those people had to get the dogs from somewhere, and never once did you hear me state that all those who owned APBTs back in the day were reputable people, but the fact remains that when the dogs were pitdogs and family dogs belonging to the agerage Joe, we didn't have the problems that we have today.

As for being banned kudos to BSL, BSL exists because of irresponsible owners who think it's ok for Foofy to go to the dog park and that it's ok for Fido to go run outside, unleashed, to do his business on the front lawn...or even the neighbors front lawns. It exists because people have turned the breeding of these dogs into a job and a lifestyle and only care about the money that it brings in. They could care less who they actually sell the dogs to. BSL exists because people who have unfortunately obtained a 'pit bull' with a less than stellar temperament keep making excuses for it (it was abused, it wasn't fed much, it wasn't petted much as a puppy.....boohoo) until the day it makes national headlines when it plants it's canines into the wrong person who actually reports it.

In short, BSL was caused and is caused by irresponsible and unreputable 'pit bull' owners. And the vast majority of these would've never even owned the dogs had the HSUS not started with their **** back in the day. In a few short years, the HSUS turned these dogs into one of the hottest commodities to hit the market since weed and cocaine and in return, they've gained a never-ending influx of donations that have only served to buy mansions and jets and expensive cars for the employees.
You are right about your history part, but I also know that they can get very protective of their territory and family. And because people are generally scared of them, this makes them a great guardian if you know what I mean :).
 

CaliTerp07

Active Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
7,652
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
38
Location
Alexandria, VA
#27
I think the leash is cute. It gives the immediate image of a family dog, ready to go for a walk.

And a good article too--informative to me, someone who knows essentially nothing about pitbulls.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
#28
You are right about your history part, but I also know that they can get very protective of their territory and family. And because people are generally scared of them, this makes them a great guardian if you know what I mean :).
Of course she's right about the history. She's right about the rest of it too. Do a llttle reading up on Mia before you correct her on ANYTHING Pit Bull.

And go read some of our more epic Pit Bull threads. There's a link to one of the more informative ones in the last part of "The End is Near" in the Hydrant.
 

Boemy

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
2,481
Likes
0
Points
0
#29
I think the dog on the front is Sweet Jasmine. Isn't she the one who's really shy of strangers still? Maybe she felt more comfortable with the leash being held (presumably) by her owner.
 

AllieMackie

Wookie Collie
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
6,598
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ottawa, ON
#30
Gosh, that makes me happy - I'm in Ontario, and adore pitties, so anything that pushes against BSL makes me happy. <3 Yay!
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#31
Actually Boxer, my dogs would happily hop on the UPS truck and drive off with the driver after he rings my doorbell vs. trying to protect me.

Face it: NO ONE ever knows if their dog will truly protect them unless that dog has been tested in a real-life situation. Protection dogs don't just come along a dime a dozen. Most dogs will bark, but when the situation intensifies, they will turn tail and run. It doesn't make your dog a coward, it most cases it makes it smart. Fight or flight. Most choose flight.

"Pit Bulls" should never be used as or even seen as protection dogs. To put that falsehood out into public circulation is another blow against the breeds and a helping hand to BSL.

In fact, after the HSUS touted about how these dogs "don't feel pain" and how they can seemingly ingest broken glass & gunpowder and carry on with no problems and how it takes about 10 bullets to even make them slow down (much less kill them), then those thugs who need protection decided what better type of dog to be there guard dogs. So they got them and have done their best to create such dogs. Therein lies the problem: "pit bulls" touted as good protection dogs have serious temperament issues. Since the gangstas of the world think HA equals protection, they began breeding the most off-in-the-head HA dogs for that trait and now we've got a big problem on our hands with some "pit bulls" out there that have the temperaments of a starving crocodile. And it's not right. Those dogs needs to be culled and by culled I mean shot, euthanized, etc. There is NO room in this world for an HA "pit bull".

Hell, I actually have a Rottweiler and a Dogo Argentino to PROTECT my APBTs (although I'm the true protector ;) ). Any stranger could knock down my fence in the middle of the night, unchain a dog, and walk off like nothing has happened and the dog would be perfectly happen to go somewhere knew. (for the record, my dogs are indoors in kennels......so don't even try it)

But again, "pit bulls" are NOT good protection dogs, never have been good protection dogs, nor should they ever be thrust onto the market as good protection dogs.
 

Cheetah

Fluffy Corgi Addict
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
1,081
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Saint Paul, MN
#32
I think the dog on the front is Sweet Jasmine. Isn't she the one who's really shy of strangers still? Maybe she felt more comfortable with the leash being held (presumably) by her owner.
That's what I was thinking - they had the leash on for her security, and so she wouldn't run away scared. Also, I think the leash looks good, as it's a holiday issue, and the background is red and the leash is green so it's Christmassy.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#33
That's what I was thinking - they had the leash on for her security, and so she wouldn't run away scared.
And that's sad for a whole other reason.

I've done my fair share of rescue work. And I've done my years at the clinic. I've seen 'pit bulls' that have been neglected, nearly fatally starved, hit/beaten, stabbed, and even dragged behind vehicles (some to their death). But the amazing thing about all those dogs is that it was rare for any of them to have issues regarding humans whether we were strangers or not. THAT is the true temperament.

No matter the sob story behind the dog, bad nerves, fear, and heave-forbid, fear aggression, are not the norm. Nor should they be glorified.
 

Cheetah

Fluffy Corgi Addict
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
1,081
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Saint Paul, MN
#34
It may be sad, but she was a very mistreated dog who is still recovering. So I didn't mean anything by it. Only stating what I saw.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#35
It may be sad, but she was a very mistreated dog who is still recovering. So I didn't mean anything by it. Only stating what I saw.

I didn't mean to direct this at you. :) I was just commenting on the statement itself.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
2,365
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
High Ridge, MO
#36
You are right about your history part, but I also know that they can get very protective of their territory and family. And because people are generally scared of them, this makes them a great guardian if you know what I mean :).
If one of my dogs was ever protective over us or our yard, I would be taking a hard look at their temperament. My dogs know that they are supposed to be welcoming and sensible. We had a stranger come wandering in our yard while I was hanging a new cowhide on the springpole. He was a bit strange, so Loki walked over and sniffed his pants-leg, then moved back to a position where she was about 6 feet in front of me and watched him. That's about the extent of protection I'd expect in a situation like that.

To the original topic, kudos to SI. I picked up the magazine and put it in the baggy with the original SI mag from the 80s. One more for the collection. :D
 

Members online

Top