Save the Earth... Sterilise yourself

HoundedByHounds

Oh, it's *you*
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,415
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
N Texas, USA
#2
Really her choice to make...for whatever reason she chooses to make it. Kinda odd to get media coverage for it tho...must be a slow news day.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
#3
Yeah... But this line is what pisses me off.

"I found it insulting that she thought that, just because I was a woman, I'd reach a point where an urge to breed would overcome all rational thought."

So having children is an irrational thought? I personally think that having a child is the most selfless thing a person can do.


Even better...

"I've never doubted that I made the right decision. Ed and I married in September 2002, and have a much nicer lifestyle as a result of not having children."

Having children is selfish, yet this tells me she is not having children because SHE is selfish....

Dollars to doughnuts, when she is old and alone, she will regret not having children and grandchildren.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#4
Well... I agree, it is a little odd that she got media coverage for it. I mean, sure, we have an overpopulation on earth and it is causing environmental problems if you look at it that way. But who really cares what her reason for sterilizing herself is? If she doesn't want children, she doesn't want children, for whatever reason.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#5
No - I totally agree with her.

She was insulted that the Dr would presume that SHE wasn't being rational.

I really don't have a problem with the article, and I am about as broody as broody gets. Always wanted sproglets.

Why take offense that she doesn't want kids?

Didn't we just have this discussion the other week? hahaha.
 

Gempress

Walks into Mordor
Joined
Aug 12, 2005
Messages
11,955
Likes
0
Points
0
#7
"I found it insulting that she thought that, just because I was a woman, I'd reach a point where an urge to breed would overcome all rational thought."
Puck, I don't think she was trying to say that having children is irrational---at least not in this particular quote. :rolleyes: I think she's saying that she her own reasons for not having children, but people seemed to take it for granted that just because she's female, she'd suddenly have an overwhelming biological urge to have a child and let her reasoning fly out the window. And I agree with her, it is insulting.

I certainly don't think that giving birth is the end of the world. But if that's what makes her happy. *shrug*
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#8
I think what she means is that just because you are married or you get older as a woman you don't have to have children. I can see where she is coming from. We have been married a little over two years and it seems that everyone from my inlaws is expecting that Dan will knock me up any minute. Some women never want children, so what? And if you hold that stance you'd be surprised how many raised eyebrows you get. And, quite frankly, I get shudders when I see how many girls have babies they just should not have because they are in no way to provide for a child- and I am not only talking about financial issues.

Of course she'll be able to live a "nicer" lifestyle without children. It just irks me that people call me selfish because I can appreciate a nice TV or being able to have pets instead of having popped out 5 kids by the time I turn 23. I am not selfish, I just have different priorities- at least for now. And quite frankly, I am not sure whether I ever want to have kids or not. And I don't know if I will regret it later... I am sorry, but that's kinda cheesy. How many senior citizens are rotting away in retirement homes who get a visit or two from their family a year? Having kids is no guarantee that you will be cared for until the day you drop dead.
 

Puckstop31

Super-Genius
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
5,847
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
50
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
#9
Why take offense that she doesn't want kids?
I don't care that she does not want children. That is her choice. Its a step more though to imply that having children is morally wrong.

I mean, isn't that what the enviromentalist movement is about? Are we not trying to save the planet for the NEXT generations?

Still, less liberal enviro-nazis in the world can't hurt. ;)
 

HoundedByHounds

Oh, it's *you*
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,415
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
N Texas, USA
#10
I don't disagree that having kids is selfish.

I certainly did not have kids to "give them to the world"...lol. We had them because we wanted them...myself and my DH.

The concept of child bearing as a selfish act has never bothered me because in all of Nature...of which I am part...that is exactly what it is. It is about "you" and your genetic material, and your life experiences,...being passed along.

I do think expectations of women in regards to children are unfair...and it's a double standard because men do not have to face the same scrutiny.
 

HoundedByHounds

Oh, it's *you*
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,415
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
N Texas, USA
#11
BTW kooks abound...

Not long ago I read an article on "sexual vegans" that only had sex with other vegans because people who ate animal products were "made of dead animals' and smelled and tasted unclean to them.

Takes all kinds to make a world, folks!
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#12
I don't care that she does not want children. That is her choice. Its a step more though to imply that having children is morally wrong.

I mean, isn't that what the enviromentalist movement is about? Are we not trying to save the planet for the NEXT generations?

Still, less liberal enviro-nazis in the world can't hurt. ;)
I actually didn't see anywhere in the article where she pushed this idea.

I quite clearly saw HER OWN take on it, but perhaps I misread it, because I didn't see anywhere where she said we must all comply.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#13
Interesting read. And I agree, why are we still utterly convinced that's against nature for a woman not to want children? Why is it still ok for guys to want to remain childless but not women? Not all women have that "brood bitch" gene/mindset in them (please don't take that as an insult, it's not meant to be) and that's ok.

I'm still on the fence about whether or not I want children...but if and when I do, I know that I will be doing my utmost to be raising them in an environmentally sound way...i.e. cloth diapers instead of disposable (do you know these essentially never disintigrate and make up an astounding portion of landfills?) breast feeding until they can eat solid foods so there is no packaging from formula canisters, liners, etc. to throw away....making my own baby foods with a food processor instead of buying cans/jars.

And I agree with (I think it was) Jules who said that just because you have children doesn't guarantee you will live out your dotage surrounded by love and comfort. Why do you think so many nursing homes are such miserable places? It's like shelters for old people...they get the minimum care required by law, but are left alone for the majority of the time with no family coming to see them, even though they may live just a few miles away. Of course there are many facilities and families to prove this statement wrong, which is why it is an observation and not stated fact that all nursing homes suck.

Unfortunetly, those people who could raise a generation to be eco-friendly/conscious are choosing not to for reasons like the ones stated in the article. This quote by AFI's front man Davey Havok sums it up pretty well I think:
'Hate Humanity? Yep, sure do. There's such a lack of responsibilty for one's actions in the world, a selfishness, and a great destruction in the way people live their lives. It's all instant gratification,and who cares how my instant gratification affects those around me, or on a small personal level or a global level. The way people treat eachother is truly disgusting, and we've created an environment through advances in science and technology that allows for a very septic society to thrive. And we breed and breed, and all the wrong people breed while all the right people don't wanna have children because they don't wanna place them in this world'
 

MelissaCato

ĜȫƝ ₩īĿÐ
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
1,461
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Under a Rock in the USA!
#14
:yikes::yikes:

"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."
.. with this said above and her wonderful smile for the camara .... as soon as my son (Christopher) comes home from school, I'm gonna hug and tickle him till he can't stand it no more.

Sounds to me she feels guilty for the abort.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#15
No, I think in a very sterile, factual view, she's spot on. Nothing she said is untrue, it's just not what people want to hear/think about.
 

HoundedByHounds

Oh, it's *you*
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,415
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
N Texas, USA
#16
The blurb in your post is full of negativity...and that is also selfish...because I am sure the author considers themselves 'better' than those they write about...and the close companion of selfishness, is conceit.
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
#17
No, I think in a very sterile, factual view, she's spot on. Nothing she said is untrue, it's just not what people want to hear/think about.
I agree.

The world IS overpopulated, we ARE eating more resources etc etc etc...




I still like babies though :)
 

MelissaCato

ĜȫƝ ₩īĿÐ
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
1,461
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Under a Rock in the USA!
#19
No, I think in a very sterile, factual view, she's spot on. Nothing she said is untrue, it's just not what people want to hear/think about.
I can see this already. The Liberals will be petitioning all newborns to be sterile because of "factual views". I only hope then we can still claim religious exempts. :popcorn:
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#20
I guess it depends on what your morals actually are but I find it a little contradicting that she killed an innocent child because her morals tell her it hurts the planet.... AHH yes.... so take away a childs life... and that is OK morally?

I know the point of this wasn't to debate abortion but if she was really THAT concerned about having kids... she should have been a little more careful. If she didn't want kids that bad then she should have abstained from sex until she was sterilised. IMO, there is NO excuse.... she was being selfish by having sex knowing she could possibly get pregnant when she knew before hand what she would do if she were to ever experience that "horror" :rolleyes: and now she has taken away a childs life because she couldn't practice proper birth control....
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top