Mel, I respect you very much, but this statement is out of line. Who are you to say who and who doesn't support "the good of the dog"? You are not me or these other people, and you do not own and control my or their feelings. You cannot tell me whether or not I am a person that cares about dogs or not.
You may be disgusted with our holding the opinions that we do, but we are disgusted with your judgemental and condescending tone.
You may be disgusted with our holding the opinions that we do, but we are disgusted with your judgemental and condescending tone.
People who praise petstores and petstore puppies are not interested in the good of the dog. Period. People who know better and are still "on the fence" about petstore puppies are not interested in the good of the dog. Yes, it's all fine and dandy to be optimistic about it, but what kind of change is this going to make? Seriously? I have to say I am surprised that you of all people are now so indifferent about this . . .
I agree with Sparks that baby steps are better than no steps at all, but is this worthy of all the support it's getting? It's still puppies being sold in a pet store. If people were to look at this thread and decide that there are "reputable" pet stores out there that sell "good" puppies, and go out and buy one, their unworthy cause would be getting even more support.
Any petstore that sells puppies and kittens is a store that I will avoid like the plague. I am in 100% agreement with BuddysParents, particularly post 120. She said it beautifully.