New pics of the Munchkin w/new lens! (thanks Mr.Jessie! lol)

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#1
InLimbo (Mr.Jessie lol) recommended this lens and I love it :0) It takes great pictures of romeo and of me! awful weather outside so we tried indoor and I think they turned out pretty good, ENJOY







Just think the focus thing is interesting




 

Fran101

Resident fainting goat
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,546
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Boston
#2
*chihuahua glare*


aww all poised


:( shoe is bigger than me


awww your so pretty!


I put on bow! you give tummy rubs!




The end..



HOPE YOU LIKED THEM
 

InLimbo87

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
304
Likes
0
Points
0
#5
Glad you like it! Getting a hang of the shallow Depth-of-field takes some getting used to, but can make for some great portraits. I'd have to agree with Zoom, that one was well done :D
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#9
Ian, would you recommend the 35mm or the 50mm? Both are the 1.8 and I need a good low light lens.
 

InLimbo87

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
304
Likes
0
Points
0
#10
Ian, would you recommend the 35mm or the 50mm? Both are the 1.8 and I need a good low light lens.
I have both lenses, and if you asked my suggestion I'd say, well, BOTH! :p

But in all seriousness, it really comes down to which focal length you would find most useful. Set your zoom to 35, and then set it to 50 and observe the different lengths, etc. Whichever one fits, I'd go with that lens. I'm very happy with both lenses, both are great bargains.

Image quality wise I'm hard-pressed to determine which is sharper, and I doubt many people could tell the difference. The AF-S on the 35mm is nice, and I like the focal length a bit better as it is the "normal" length lens on the crop sensors. The 50mm, however, makes a nice complement too it as I can get a little bit more reach for portraits. At around $100 brand new you really can't complain either! I would still say that's the best photography-related $100 I've ever spent was on my 50.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#11
Where'd you get yours from? I'm being questioned about doing a shoot for a local MMA fighter and his clothing line, it's not until later this spring, but I'd like to have some good portrait lenses for it.
 

InLimbo87

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
304
Likes
0
Points
0
#12
Where'd you get yours from? I'm being questioned about doing a shoot for a local MMA fighter and his clothing line, it's not until later this spring, but I'd like to have some good portrait lenses for it.
I bought the 50mm used on a camera forum I'm on, but you can't go wrong with B&H B&H Photo Video | Digital Cameras, Camcorders

The 35mm I bought soon after it came out, and lucked out by finding it at my local store (there were waiting lists online).

The serious portrait photographers usually shoot with lenses 85mm + (The 85mm f/1.4 is a portrait favorite but can run around $1k). While you get your feet wet, though, the 50mm should serve you well for a shorter-length portrait lens.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top