JonBenet Ramsey case

L

LabBreeder

Guest
#22
Saje said:
So he should go to jail without hard evidence because he wants to be there? That's a waste of tax dollars IMO. And a waste of a life if you can call it that. I agree with renee that he needs to be institutionalized.

Personally, I don't think he did it. I think that he is obssessed with her and other little girls. He married his wife when she was 13 and she said he always wanted her to look younger according to an interview on Primetime last night. He's messed in the head and his reality is definitely skewed.

We are wasting tax dollars as it is. What's one more gonna hurt? I'm kidding, but it's true.
Institutionalize him for life if he is even half as messed up as he seems to be. No chance of getting out. Either way, we're wasting tax dollars. He's obsessed with young girls and needs to be put away before someone (else?) gets hurt/killed. Just because you're a sex crazed pedophile nut job doesn't mean you should go free or be allowed to roam the streets.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
117
Likes
0
Points
16
Location
Colorado
#23
Renee750il said:
What do you do in Boulder, TAVS? Do you have access to the DA's files by any chance? Or maybe the Public Defender's? ;)
Shoot. Alright; I dont have anything to offer. I work with computers but not in any government agency. Hell I won't even work in Boulder after Friday.

Hey, does anyone want to buy some grass from the Ramsey's house? I can get some for you. :D
 

smkie

pointer/labrador/terrier
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
55,184
Likes
35
Points
48
#24
that's as bad as when Aaron went to the store and came back saying he could remember it was something that had an e in it..he brought tea instead of cheese..makes you wonder about menfolk doesn't iT?
 

Saje

Island dweller
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
23,932
Likes
1
Points
38
#25
LabBreeder said:
We are wasting tax dollars as it is. What's one more gonna hurt? I'm kidding, but it's true.
Institutionalize him for life if he is even half as messed up as he seems to be. No chance of getting out. Either way, we're wasting tax dollars. He's obsessed with young girls and needs to be put away before someone (else?) gets hurt/killed. Just because you're a sex crazed pedophile nut job doesn't mean you should go free or be allowed to roam the streets.
That's a bizarre statement. I don't think you understood what I said. I think he should be institutionalized not that sex-crazed pedophile nut jobs should be free on the street. You can't just put people in jail because they are crazy. If you just put him in jail because he thinks he should be in jail that means the real killer (if it's not him) is out free. I guess I can't really wrap my mind around what you are saying. :confused:
 
L

LabBreeder

Guest
#26
Saje said:
That's a bizarre statement. I don't think you understood what I said. I think he should be institutionalized not that sex-crazed pedophile nut jobs should be free on the street. You can't just put people in jail because they are crazy. If you just put him in jail because he thinks he should be in jail that means the real killer (if it's not him) is out free. I guess I can't really wrap my mind around what you are saying. :confused:

The more I read what I typed the more I see how it came out "bizarre". I understand that you think he should be institutionalized. Basically, we know he's a pedophile nut that needs to be institutionalized (at minimum) even if he didn't kill her. If he did, I say he should be in jail OR never let out of the institution.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#27
I heard today that the DNA was "compromised" and therefore inadmissable in court now.

I don't know what to think. The whole case is odd and disturbing on so many levels, the very least of which is the fact that a six year old was made to wear more makeup than a 2-bit hooker and prance around on stage for her mother's benefit. Everything else is just gravy after that.

But Karr does need to be locked away, even if he didnt' kill Ramsey. He has already proven himself to be a menace to small children and shouldn't be allowed to freely roam.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#28
I agree Zoom . This case has been so messed up on all counts, I really doubt if it will ever go to a trial and conviction. TAVS.... what kind of grass !!! LOL!!
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
3,711
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
44
Location
TX
#29
The guys a loon.. that part is correct, but Im not convinced he killed her. If he did.. great.. they got their guy, case is closed, but I dont think he did it. I think he's so obsessed with the case that he wishes he did it, but there's no proof he killed her. All there is, is him saying "I was with her when she died" what does that mean?

What did he say... "I drugged her, and gave her alcohol" there wasnt any trace of drugs or an alcoholic substance in her.. just a whole bunch of pineapple. Weird that he would say that...

Then there was that 8 page randsom note. Who leaves an 8 page randsom note? Its not a note.. its a letter... I remember they were asking for the exact amount of dollars that her dad received as a bonus check from his company... weirdness..

I think there is another side of the story involving her parents. They were a wealthy family, they had money, beautiful children.. list goes on... nobody decides out of the blue to kidnap, and murder someones child for the hell of it... especially a wealthy's family's child without a motive behind it.

This case was botched up from the very beginning, and its still botched up.. even with this loon in the picture, nobody seems to know what to do with him. I think the person who knows more about the case then anyone is her mother... and she's dead.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#30
I agree !!! I still feel the son was involved ......and someone tried to cover up . Lord, I just want to know the truth !!!
 

tempura tantrum

Shiba Inu Slave
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
768
Likes
2
Points
0
Location
pacific northwest
#31
I still wholly believe it was the parents.

That house was a MAZE. Maids who had worked there for YEARS didn't know the room JonBenet's body was found in even EXISTED. The cops searched the house for seven hours and never happened upon her body. It was JonBenet's father who found her body, and then promptly MOVED it from the scene of the crime, carried it upstairs and threw a blanket over it.

I'm sorry...I don't care HOW distraught you are, everyone knows that the cardinal rule at a crime scene is that you touch NOTHING.

Going back to the house- are we really supposed to believe that a man brilliant enough to break into the house without leaving any signs of a forced entry (or fingerprints), a man brilliant enough to navigate a house described by past employees as a "labyrinth," is dumb enough to forget to bring his own pen and paper to write a ransom note? A ransom note that is 8 pages long? A ransom note that had several drafts, which were found in the kitchen wastepaper basket???

My feelings on such a matter would be that if you had just killed someone and feared being caught, you probably wouldn't sit down in the family home to write an 8 page letter about it.

And who writes a ransom note and LEAVES the body in the house? Your whole bargaining point is gone.

And I agree with Irish- the pageant thing is really too disturbing to ignore. There is NO reason a 6 year old girl should be wearing such blatantly sexy make-up, clothing, and hairstyles. And what other way can you describe what she was wearing?? I saw a video of her just today in which I kid you not, she was in a Vegas showgirl costume. WTF???? SHE'S SIX!!!!

Her parents dehumanized her. I really think they viewed her as a LOT older than she actually was, and whatever happened, I think this may have contributed to it.

Furthermore, I don't know if you guys remember this, but I remember thinking at 12 years old, that this was odd: In interviews with the press JonBenet's mom kept saying "I loved THAT child." Not "I love JonBenet," or "I loved my little girl." Referring to someone that close to you in such a manner is a classic way to distance yourself from that person. Kind of strange...
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.
Top