If Martin Richling and Ceaser Milan don't know how to train dogs...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Emmalee

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
506
Likes
0
Points
0
#22
I have just gotten off of the phone with Mr. Richling, and if you all understood what his dogs have to do and where he has to do it, you would understand WHY he trains the way he does. The stress that his dogs were under in the past and the stress that his dogs are now currently under calls for these methods. He also had given me numbers from people/clients of his and told me to call them. I have spoken to several thus far (the list numbers over 50 alone) and they all have read these posts and are LAUGHING at the misrepresentation on here of him. He (Richling) said that after he tried to answer professionally in the beginning but was met by a bunch of fools with their minds made-up already, that he then decided to give them what they were accusing him of: and he did love it too! I have also checked his professional K-9 experience and I understand why he cannot post details of where he worked for security reasons. And the slander regarding him on a personal level is simply a JOKE. And as far as you DR2little saying that the "minority" trains like that? Well, most of the time in this world, the minority is correct. If you knew anything at all of world history and events, etc...Not all the time mind you: most of the time.
And it still needs to be said LOUD AND CLEAR: did any of you ever notice that not one time can it be said that Richling's methods DO NOT WORK? Now, is that not the bottom line? I could see if Richling's training produced dogs that were afraid of their owners; but nothing could be more farther from the truth. Those dogs LOVE their owners. It just seems to me that the same people who do not physically correct their dogs do not believe in spanking kids either. Such a reflection of the 'slouching unto perdition' society we currently live in...Richling is right. That is my opinion.
I understand that Richling trains K-9 dogs, and I know you have to train them a special way because they deal with police etc... but does he train all non K-9 dogs the way he trains K-9's?

I didn't like the way he thought him and his dogs were more superior then us regular pet owners. All dogs are created equal. Some may have more training then others, but that doesn't make them "better" than another persons dog.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#23
Both methods do work. IME postive works better. But even if we said they worked equally. Why do people feel the need to physically punish those weaker than them?

I to started out using positive punishment. It was not nearly as fast or thorough as the training I do now. My dogs progress faster than others in our local club who do use punishment.

If you all want to suppress your dogs into what ever type of 'obedience' you can. I have dogs because I love dogs, I have a great respect for all living creatures..I don't wish to do anything to them to diminish them. I don't see them as my enemy who needs to be forced to submit, a slave with me as Master. I see them as partners, with me leading in the dance. My dogs obey, because they respect me, trust me, like me. Not because they have come to fear me, or what I can do to them.

This is my one and only post on this subject as there is nothing I can add to what DR and Doberluv have said. For those of you who wish to believe the earth is flat, I am glad it works for you.
 

Emmalee

New Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
506
Likes
0
Points
0
#25
I didn't want to start an argument.. lol.. sorry!

I just wanted to know a proper way to train a dog was, and I got my answer.. whatever works best for you and your dog :)
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#26
Both methods do work. IME postive works better. But even if we said they worked equally. Why do people feel the need to physically punish those weaker than them?

I to started out using positive punishment. It was not nearly as fast or thorough as the training I do now. My dogs progress faster than others in our local club who do use punishment.

If you all want to suppress your dogs into what ever type of 'obedience' you can. I have dogs because I love dogs, I have a great respect for all living creatures..I don't wish to do anything to them to diminish them. I don't see them as my enemy who needs to be forced to submit, a slave with me as Master. I see them as partners, with me leading in the dance. My dogs obey, because they respect me, trust me, like me. Not because they have come to fear me, or what I can do to them.

This is my one and only post on this subject as there is nothing I can add to what DR and Doberluv have said. For those of you who wish to believe the earth is flat, I am glad it works for you.
Ditto....exactly. Good post Dekka. I use to do a little of that yank and crank myself way back about 30 years ago. There's no comparrison...no question that +R works better.
 

Buddy'sParents

*Finding My Inner Fila*
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
25,377
Likes
0
Points
36
#27
so you can bring in your "followers" And its like a party, but when we bring in our followers it WWIII. Are you scared?
Why don't you try contributing to a conversation intelligently? And hey- let's not make that a suggestion but rather a definitive push in the direction you should be.
 

Buddy'sParents

*Finding My Inner Fila*
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
25,377
Likes
0
Points
36
#28
I didn't want to start an argument.. lol.. sorry!

I just wanted to know a proper way to train a dog was, and I got my answer.. whatever works best for you and your dog :)
Just a warning- training topics are HOT, lol.

I really believe that people need to give positive reinforcement with love and treats a good honest try. I've never met a dog it didn't work on and I've been around dogs all my life. :)
 
P

Purdue#1

Guest
#31
Listen Purdue, I don't know you from Eve but I'm painfully aware of your lack of knowledge as illustrated by your posts. Next time you address me in that fashion I will slap you with an infraction without a thought. The time after that, you'll be banned.:mad:
i didn't reply to you i replied to doberlov.
 

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#32
I have been swamped lately and haven't been able to respond to any of these recent "training" threads but I have skimmed through them and I'm speechless.....ALMOST.;)

The methods used by people such as the two men being debated about are antiquated and proven to add substantial risk for less than predictable results.

As for the posters (civilians;) ) on this board who discount their methods as old school, primative and even dangerous - I can tell you that as a professional certified behavior specialist who works extensively (very successfully) with aggression/bite cases, I stand shoulder to shoulder with those 'civilians' and whole heartedly agree!!!!! Positive PHYSICAL punishment DOES NOT WORK RELIABLY AND IS INHUMANE!!!!!!

I DO NOT lay a hand on any of the dogs that I work with EVER. I train many dogs that outweigh me, often by 100%. Many of the dogs that I work with are at a last stop before the final needle and are what so many like to dramatically call RED ZONE. I use proven +R methods to actually effect behavior change and truly rehab. dogs who more often than not have been physically corrected to the point of total unpredictability. People who use the old yank/crank methods have chosen to remain in the dark ages.....it's a **** shame.

I see that there are a few on here who seem to merely want to hold onto their 'right' to physically punish their dogs. From where I have been (my roots in Schutz), to where I am now..I can't look back on the way that we ALL used to train without feeling physically ill. While I never participated in some of the horrible kinds of mistreatment (including the use of stave), I watched as "trainers" abused dogs to the point of screaming. It turns my stomach to read here that anyone would discount proven humane methods simply for the sake of arguement. It shows a total lack of understanding of the science behind DOMESTIC canine learning, not to mention a frightening lack of heart.

I and many other successful trainers am achieving better results, much more predictable behavior, without having to yank, hit, frighten or intimidate. The dogs that I rehab. and train today are also happier and more eager to learn. They learn quicker and maintain what they've learned, all while RETAINING ALL THAT IS DOG!

The dogs who attend my Growl classes are actually rehabilitated when they graduate. The DA and HA is no longer an issue because they actually learn to accept and in many cases even enjoy the presence of the trigger. No punishment, no avoidance...real rehabilitation.

Cesar (while very charming) and that other guy (can't even bring myself to type his name:mad: )...well, they simply have no clue that they have no clue!!!:rolleyes:

Melissa, I have to ask you why you are so hostile to those so willing to find a kinder way to train the animal you're supposed to love. This is a dog forum after all. Please try to have an open mind to those who have more experience and an understanding for training. I've been doing this professionally for many, many years. I used to believe at least some of what you seem to want to hang onto as gospel. You are in the minority for a reason, maybe you should reflect a bit on that instead of trying to protect your right/need to punish.
your brilliant
read it all and agree 100%

wish so much I lived near you, I'd be lining up for your help
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#33
So. I invite richling's "followers" to come here you send "vibes" to doc. There's no difference there.
There is a huge difference and it is this. Doc has been an established and well-respected member here for over a year. The "vibes" sent to her was so that she would take a break from running her training business to add the professional and scientifically backed-up knowledge to what has otherwise degenerated into a mud-slinging "verbal" fistfight.

You, on the other hand, have not been a member for even a year. You are brining in a vast number of people of whom the majority will not even stick around once these threads drop off the main page. That is known as trolling.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#35
Hey, we're always glad to have new people join who are interested in actually becoming an active member.

We had quite the go-round with another flood of "Others" ;) from another forum, some of those stuck around and have established themselves as worth listening to. It's not hard to do.
 

zanadu

New Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
23
Likes
0
Points
0
#36
"others". are we in high school? i joined because this seemed to be an community of fellow dog lovers with the same passion as me. (differnt views on training or not) you aren't being so welcoming.
 

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#37
i think the "others" comment was made as a joke. hence the ;) behind it.

yes, chaz members can become very community minded, imagine being in your house and 30 people come running in the door.. lol
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
10,119
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
wasilla alaska
#40
I would have Doc or Dober train my dogs. If Cesar or Mr Richling where the only dog trainers available, I would not use them, even if I needed my dog for Shutz or security work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.
Top