Home euthanization service was pet hell: trial

Sweet72947

Squishy face
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
9,159
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Northern Virginia
#2
That's really weird.

In the US if we want to PTS our dog at home, there are Mobile Veterinarians who will come and provide the service, and they certainly don't charge $600! That's a ripoff, IMO.

Always ask for credentials.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#3
There are vets who will do it here. I know there are. I don't think they charge an extraordinary fee, either.

Those poor pet owners :( :(

And those jerks will probably get away with it because it's "only animals". Sigh.. :( :(
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
96
Likes
0
Points
6
Age
38
Location
Portugal
#4
Yes I agree that $689 for the service is a ripoff. If convicted the couple could face a $100,000 fine. But I think jail time for them is better instead of paying a $100,000 fine. What do you think?
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#6
Uhhh...one does not euthanize an animal by administering Euthasol in the muscle.

Not that I would ever call someone like that, but if I was ignorant to the cause and did call them and they showed up and did that to my dog, they would've been eating concrete.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#7
It is sad.. BUT there are lots of people out there who LOVED the service, on other pet boards there are people upset because this service may be discontinued. All the people putting the animals down are licensed vets. The owners just run the business.

In Toronto there are many clinics that will charge you nearly that cost and you have to go to them. Its sad these people had such an upsetting experience.. but if they had gone to that vet's clinic they would have likely received the same treatment. Some dogs react badly to anaesthetics.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#8
I don't think they did..

I have seen cats put down that way.. a trank in the muscle then a needle in the heart. Its not usually upsetting though.

When Sammy was put down his heart wouldn't stop with the normal dosages in the vein so they gave him a needle in the heart. My vet asked if I was ok with that or if I wanted to leave. I guess they normally don't do that is it is an upsetting thought for the owner (tho the pet is so far out of it they don't notice)
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#9
All the people putting the animals down are licensed vets.
Oh, I must've misread/misunderstood that. For some reason I got that they were doing it themselves.

I don't think they did..
Again I must've misunderstood. You are correct in that some cases a tranquilizer is given and then the Euthasol is administered directly into the heart. But I can say that in those cases, well with my experience, we knock the animal so far out that it doesn't flinch or make a sound when we do the other injection. It's gruesome to watch, sure, but I've never seen an animal awake to suffer from it.

Again, I guess we need to let the facts come out and remember the media is the media after all.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#10
Pet Heaven - News

This is their site. It says:

Shelley, working together with her husband Eric will look after everything. They will come to your home or animal hospital to pick up your deceased pet and make the arrangements for the burial or cremation. They are compassionate, loving and understanding.

. . .

Blechman’s Veterinarian confided in her that many Vets feel a hospital is the last place in the world a person should have their pet "put to sleep". Generally, pets hate going to the Veterinarian.

While putting a pet out of its suffering can be very trying for the owner, Shelley Blechman can reduce that stress by helping you organize a mobile veterinarian to come to your home..
So supposedly they arrange for a vet to come to your home but the article said she and her husband came, didn't it? She and her husband are NOT vets. Now I'm confused.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#11
They said they're licensed vets but no one showed them any proof that they were vets and they were dressed shabbily, very unprofessionally.


She had used them before with no issues but it doesn't say what was different this time.

Margaret Routh, who had used Pet Heaven twice without any problems, said she called them in again in September 2007 to put her Jack Russell down.
The only thing the article says about dress is...

Witnesses said Eric Blechman showed up wearing a Harley Davidson motorcycle jacket or driving a pick-up truck with Harley decals, something McGurk said she found "oddly inappropriate" for the occasion.
It never said shabbily or how the vet was dressed.

She never says whether the last times she used that service if the vet had 'proved' he was a vet. If she was worried why didn't she ask?

The article is written in such away that it casts doubt and infers much.

It might have been a horrible experience.. but I find the article too vague and leading.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#12
No, the people that used the service this time had NEVER used the service before.

Then they talked to a lady who HAD used the service before.

Hopefully more information will be put up that will clear up the confusion. I've had pets euthanized and they should NOT make a sound, except for the initial needle insertion. They certainly shouldn't make any more sounds or sound like they're suffering.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#13
Guess we weren't the only ones confused. Here's more information:

Pet firm fights vet college over euthanasia services

Witness recounts painful death of 15-year-old dog in case against Pet Heaven and its owners

KATE HAMMER February 6, 2009

Maybe all dogs don't go to heaven.

Certainly, Megan McGurk's dog, Jack, went through hell.

After 15 years, a long happy life for a canine, the lab-retriever mix became immobilized and Ms. McGurk contacted a company called Pet Heaven, to have a veterinarian attend her Toronto home to euthanize and then cremate her pet.

But Jack's death was a slow one. He whimpered as the veterinarian injected the Euthanol into his hind leg, and his paws began to jerk as though he were trying to run.

Ms. McGurk recounted his painful death yesterday as a witness in the trial of Pet Heaven and its two owners, Shelley and Eric Blechman, before the Ontario Court of Justice.

The company and both Blechmans have been charged by the College of Veterinarians of Ontario with practising veterinary medicine without a licence and could face fines of up to $55,000.

The Blechmans, a genial couple in their fifties with an enthusiasm for quadrupeds, don't claim to be veterinarians. However, the Veterinarian's Act forbids them from either practising veterinary medicine or offering veterinary services, including euthanasia.

The Blechmans and their lawyer, Michael Pasquale, maintain that they are not offering veterinary services, rather that they are only helping their grief-stricken clients to gain access to a qualified professional who can put their pets to sleep at home, rather than in the sterile environment of a clinic.

"The College of Veterinarians seems to feel that we're acting as veterinarians by arranging for a vet to visit a client's home, which just doesn't make sense," Mr. Blechman said during a court lunch break.

Bernard LeBlanc, a lawyer for the college, pointed to volumes of invoices made out to Pet Heaven for services including euthanasia, and a postcard advertising a "new service" that "provides an alternative to hospital euthanasia."

All of the former clients who appeared in court yesterday, including Ms. McGurk, had their pets euthanized by Grigory Brodetsky, a veterinarian who was also called as a witness.

A large black toolbox at his side, Dr. Brodetsky sat bolt upright in the witness box. His stare darted between Mr. LeBlanc and Justice of the Peace Kevin Madigan.

In rapid, broken English, Dr. Brodetsky denied any association with Pet Heaven, even though records seized by a college investigator showed that he had been paid in excess of $28,000 by the company.

"I told [the Blechmans] not call me, that I don't work for them, I only work for the people," he told the courtroom.

The Blechmans later dismissed suggestions that Dr. Brodetsky was trying to dodge blame or prosecution (client testimony suggested that his euthanasia procedures were clumsy, unorthodox and even harmful). The couple asserted that his testimony must have lost something in translation. (Dr. Brodetsky's native tongue is Russian).

The Blechmans have made a living off sentimentality for nearly five years. Pet Heaven offers cremation services, dog- house-shaped urns, and funeral services for pets. They are fighting the charges because they feel the service they provide is vital to pet owners.

"For every one complaint, there's 300 very happy people who are grateful for what we do," Mr. Blechman said.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#14
The company and both Blechmans have been charged by the College of Veterinarians of Ontario with practising veterinary medicine without a licence and could face fines of up to $55,000.
This is true..and they will likely get stopped as you can't run a vet practise unless you are a vet (even if you never touch the animals) A euthanasia clinic is considered a vet clinic under the law.

The Blechmans have made a living off sentimentality for nearly five years. Pet Heaven offers cremation services, dog- house-shaped urns, and funeral services for pets. They are fighting the charges because they feel the service they provide is vital to pet owners.
See this makes it look bad. Soo all the companies that make urns and commemorative stones are doing something shady? The fact that they have been doing this for 1/2 a decade and seem to have high customer satisfaction (at least till now)

Knowing the media if there are other people who had bad experiences the will be coming out of the woodwork anytime now.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#15
I don't think pet memorabelia like urns, etc., is a problem - just if you provide the euthanasia service.

The vet doesn't sound all that competent. Why he would deny what he did is a bit strange but maybe his English is really, really poor.

Hopefully they can work something out whereby the VET is the one responsible and these people were just helping people with their pets. I don't think they did anything wrong, actually, but that vet sounds a bit suspicious.
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#16
No I was talking about the
he Blechmans have made a living off sentimentality
comment. Making it sound bad they made their living providing this service.
 
B

bjdobson

Guest
#17
Yes, it does make it sound bad but it's not, of course. Sheesh. Obviously plenty of people paid them for this service and were pleased with it. I guess time will tell what happens.
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#18
The Blechmans have made a living off sentimentality
Its pretty insulting to the owners too. When I had Bago put down, I had it done at home, because he was so afraid of vets. It went well . . . and because I didn't own the house I had him cremated and returned in a little wooden box. Yes, I paid to have him put down at home, and transported to the crematorium (that part because I had to get to my bar class), and yes I paid for an individual cremation, though I took the default box because it was attractive enough. But I don't think I was being especially sentimental for a companion of 11 years who had died young (Bago was a cat).

I did find the pet funeral home (where I picked up his box) a little creepy/amusing, but if people want that sort of full blown service, who is the press to critize either those who want it or those who provide it? Unless of course they are impersonating vets.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#19
I've only had my own vets do it .... both Clinics were/are dear to me . They knew me , they knew my dogs .... all were privately cremated there and ashes returned in tasteful tins. I have no regrets .
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
7,402
Likes
0
Points
0
#20
I don't know what I would have done without my Vets. coming to my home. I was able to sedate her on my own before they even arrived, she was so afraid of going to the Vets and HATED anything remotely resembling a needle.

When they got to my home, they allowed me time to talk, cry and prepare myself and then they gave another sedative with a very tiny needle between her shoulder blades. Once she was not responding almost at all and they were sure that I was ready to say goodbye, the gave the final injection in her tiny forearm.

I was then encouraged to take my time with her for our final goodbye before they took her with them for private cremation.

There is no way to make that last act wonderful, but I would never have done this any other way. I don't know what I could possibly have done to make it less stressful for Tia and still I agonized over her last moments...and still do. I can only imagine what those poor people endured having such a violent end, one that they chose with compassion in mind, for their dear dog.

Just horrible.:mad:
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top