She cites peer reviewed stuff, but some of the bigger ones she cites often are pretty shoddy from a scientific standpoing. Peer reviewed yes, do they yield quality data? questionable at best, but it doesn't stop her from manipulating it to her desired outcome.
anyway, I still haven't found a better source than the Stephen Lindsay series. It's a pretty dry read, text book like, but most everything else is written with a lot of emotion under the guise of "science". Doesn't mean they're all bad, most are really pretty good overall, but there's still some pretty big assumptions and omissions in a lot of them.