Dog Owners May Be Ignoring Pit Bull Law

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#1
Last modified: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 3:27 PM CDT

Dog owners may be ignoring pit bull law


By Brian Flinchpaugh

A man walking his dogs on a Berkeley street seems normal enough - except if the two dogs happen to be pit bulls.

That's what had Berkeley Ward 4 Councilwoman Louvenia Mathison, Mayor Kyra Watson and residents worried at Monday's city council meeting.

Mathison told city officials she's heard complaints from her ward that some residents may be keeping pit bulls as pets. That's despite a two-year-old ordinance that prohibits them in the city.

"If you see someone walking pit bulls in the street, call it in," Mathison told the council and residents at the meeting.

Some residents may think puppies or some types of dogs are grandfathered in and not subject to the ordinance, passed in February 2005, she said.

Watson agreed, saying new residents in particular may not be aware of the ordinance. "We have to keep track of it," she said.

The city's ordinance prohibits "certain dogs" such as pit bulls and Rottweilers.

The penalty for violations is a fine of $1,000 or a 90-day jail term.

Residents at the meeting said they've seen people with suspicious-looking dogs, taking them out for walks.

"They're definitely out there," said Eric Willis, a city resident. Willis said he's owned Rottweilers, but pit bulls "are something else entirely."

Watson and Mathison said they've heard no reports of incidents or attacks.

But Mathison said residents on one street are worried.

"The owner has been letting the dogs out to run around," she said.

Reach Brian Flinchpaugh a [email protected].
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#2
First, let me start by saying despite my hatred for breed bans, my dislike at those, who choose to break the law by keeping their dog thus handing out the dog's death sentence without a care in world, rivals it.

However, this article gets under my skin. For instance:
Residents at the meeting said they've seen people with suspicious-looking dogs
What the heck is a "suspicious looking dog"? Is it or is it not one of the 'pit bull' breeds? IMO, this is probably a case of mistaken identity but these people have nothing better to do than screen the sreets for suspicious looking dogs.:rolleyes:

Second, I'd like to slap the stupid out of this idiot:
"They're definitely out there," said Eric Willis, a city resident. Willis said he's owned Rottweilers, but pit bulls "are something else entirely."
Ok, so he owned a breed bred specifically for guardian work thus making the dog a lot more aloof & wary of people, yet a breed that was bred solely for pitfighting another dog is much much worse? So much worse that he defends one banned breed & places all the blame on another? Here's your sign...............

And btw, I own a Rottweiler & adore the breed.
 

Dreyfus_Fang

Crazy Person + Dog = Love
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
23
Likes
0
Points
0
#3
Residents at the meeting said they've seen people with suspicious-looking dogs
Oh wow, a suspicious looking dog. Whoopdeedoo, let's go run over a grasshoper!! Seriously!!

Okay, say we all of a sudden ban golden retrievers (and yes I know there's are 999999.99999999999999999999999% chance that will NEVER happen). Then we'll see how you feel, then we won't care, and that will make you mad, and we still won't care, because you didn't care about us and pitbulls.

Grrr. Stuff like that makes me so MAD.​
 
S

savethebulliedbreeds

Guest
#4
I think it may someday come to that. That other breeds start being banned. That is if something is not done now. I do agree that there are a lot of dog owners out there that think that it will never affect them or their dog. If and when it does though, I bet every one of them will be doing the same things us bully owners are right now. Right now though a lot of them could give a crap less what happens to our dogs. I however will still fight for whatever breed gets banned next.

A friend of mine put a "news release" on her website from CVT....(people thought it was CTV), for a joke. She said in the news release that Ontario was going to ban labs. All of a sudden there were people coming out of the woodwork that wanted to help. People that had never wanted to help before. These people were outraged. The same people that before the "news release" said banning was a good idea. I know it was a little cruel, but funny as hell. Made some people understand how we feel.

I am not talking about anyone on this forum thinking this way btw.

Uh, how did I get on this topic anyways. Sorry for hijacking Miakoda.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#5
They ALMOST banned Pitties here last year after a horrific attack , but too many owners showed up at the meetings with their great dogs. The ban here is no tying dogs out from 11 PM and 5 AM .!! This should help if it's reinforced !
 

DryCreek

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
428
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
The Great White North
#6
Watch out people. Your Boxer's and Rhodesian Ridgebacks are suspicious. There are just to many different breeds and crosses of the same that could be considered suspicious that it's probably not worth owning a short haired dog that weighs more than 20 lbs or you may end up in jail for 90 days. :mad:

Watson and Mathison said they've heard no reports of incidents or attacks.

But Mathison said residents on one street are worried.

"The owner has been letting the dogs out to run around," she said.
This is not a breed specific problem, it is an ownership and containment problem as are the majority of the problems that created this need for BSL :rolleyes:

savethebulliedbreeds- I read that "news release". The reason it worked so well is that once they have a ban in place for one breed, it is so much easier to add more breeds to it. And boy oh boy did it raise a stink. People were offended that they were needlessly worried about losing their dogs, sucks eh?

Here is the link to read the "news release". The comments afterwords are priceless.....

http://caveat.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/8/23/2257176.html
 

noludoru

Bored Now.
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
17,830
Likes
8
Points
38
Location
Denver, CO
#10
Your satire with the note that it is a satire is making the rounds of a number of lists - and it is really upsetting people because it is being sent without the codicile that it IS a satire! I am a Lab owner and Secretary for the Labrador Owners Club. I can tell you that we absolutely opposed Bill 132 because we see the danger in any dogs being banned. In fact Labradors have been on lists to be considered for banning. Using another breed to provoke thought because of the popularity of the breed is irresponsible and hurtful to the people who love that breed and that is certainly not helpful to the fight against BSL.
:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
3,242
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Missouri
#13
Strange. I don't like BSL. Also as Mia says, too much of mistaken identity when it comes to the types of dogs that actually are out. Every one is a pit.
 
S

savethebulliedbreeds

Guest
#15
Ahahahah, thanks for posting that. I never did read the comments. It is definately amazing how many people got PO'd about that. I think it was a great way to get people to realize that it could be them one day.
 

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#16
Residents at the meeting said they've seen people with suspicious-looking dogs
what are they wearing balaclavas or soemthing?
sneaking onto public property at night.

you know, you'd think with how "dangerous" these dogs are that as soon as there are any pits inthe city there would be attacks everywhere
 

DryCreek

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
428
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
The Great White North
#17
If these dog were "dangerous" don't you think that all the owners would be attacked and anyone who attended one of the shows would be attacked as well. I don't think I've ever heard of anyone at an ADBA show being attacked by one of these "vicious" dogs. Maybe it has something to do with them being responsible owners.:p
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,544
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
london, Ontario
#18
I notice a lot of people confuse so many breeds with pitt bulls, including boxers, lab mixes, etc. If I was truly concerned about my safety and the breed in question I would take a picture with my camera phone and report if it there was a danger.

I think because of this forum and a lot more research I can identify
"pitt" bull or mastiff characteristics well enough. Well enough to know
there are people walking them in the area not using a muzzle.

I am not going to report those people who in my opinion as still being responsible. Their dog displays no aggression, is very well behaved and
is always on leash. Its also questionable to the parentage because many
boxer mixes seem to be considered pitt bulls in ontario...

I don't agree with the ban in ontario and am not
going out of my way to police it. If they want people to police it more
pay the animal control to do it.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top