Dakota hurt another dog... help please ASAP

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#61
Renee750il said:
It has nothing to do with "license." It has everything to do with instinct. People don't realize that those beautiful bundles of fluffiness have a hard core down in there. And most of the time dog fights sound and look a lot worse than they really are. One ear bite will bleed like mad. And we don't know what Dakota actually "saw" . . . He's always had excellent judgement previously, as well as great obedience, so there's no call to assume that he just suddenly lost his mind - or his temperament.
i have no illusions as to what a border collie is. i see a lot of excuses being made *because* he is a border collie, though. i understand dog-aggression and i understand instinct. i also understand that there is a difference between defensive dog-aggression and offensive dog-aggression.

my concern has little to do with how much blood was drawn but rather with how far dakota pursued that dog even after it took off. i have dogs who have drawn blood on each other in play.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
94,266
Likes
3
Points
36
Location
Where the selas blooms
#62
There's the difference. Mine don't draw blood unless they mean to. But, being herding/guardians, they pursue - or more correctly, one or two pursue while the other stays back and guards.
 

moonchild1970

Designated Ball Thrower
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
375
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
WA
#63
I have to step in here and say that while it may not be right in your eyes, Dakota was doing what he was bred(BY HUMANS) to do. Which is whatever it takes to defend his flock.

It may often take alot to set off a border but when they are working they take it very seriously and this includes dealing with any threat to their flock or charges, so when either are threatened it doesn't always end nicely.
 

ihartgonzo

and Fozzie B!
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,903
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Northern California
#65
I complete agree with Renee. I just, do. :)

I know people with Border Collies who work every single day, on 100+ acres, with hundreds to thousands of stock. Yes, the dogs can be called off when another dog is working, but that's completely different. It sounds like this dog was blatantly threatening Dakota's geese, and if a dog was doing such a thing around the working dogs I know, they'd also get a little bit of a butt-kicking and would be chased away. Border Collies are also guardians of their stock, and I wouldn't want a working dog who would run off at the sight of another dog, IMO. It's not about excusing Dakota because he's a BC, it is the fact that he considers the geese HIS work, and a BC is 100% dedicated to their work. "Should" he have simply chased the dog away without a bite? Yes, but we don't know whether this could've been a snap at the nose or a nip of the ear or not. "Should" he have immediately responded to RD? Yes, but chances are he felt very threatened and was not prepared to turn his back on an attacking, strange dog. I also wanted to add... Border Collies have been bred to "think". Of course, in a level-minded way, but if these dogs could not "think" without complete guidance, how would they be able to tend a flock while out of sight of their handler? I feel that this ability to think must also apply to guarding their stock from aggressively approaching strangers. For example, if a Rottie was hanging out with their owners children and a large strange dog approached, barking and snarling, would you expect the dog to race back to the owner? No. I would hope that the dog would chase the other away, without necessarily pinning it down, but doing what must be done to drive the aggressive dog from it's kids.

Seriously, calling out RD for all of this is crazy, which is why I originally posted. A stray dog was wandering around for *hours* on private property, and she did more to try to help that dog than most would. The stray is lucky he didn't get in the face of a really dog-aggressive dog, because he would not be able to run away from that!
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#66
I think that's another good point made ihartgonzo.

Herding dogs were bred to be "independent" and make a lot of decisions on THEIR own.

This was a decision Dakota made, probably because as you mentioned he felt threatened.
 

doberkim

Naturally Natural
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
1,380
Likes
0
Points
0
#67
what are "his" geese and his livestock - he isnt there to protect these geese, hes there to chase them off, isnt he???

RD said hes being "paid" to keep geese AWAY off the beach. he's not protecting a flock that he stays with all day and keeps safe, hes supposed to be keeping geese AWAY, by chasing them.

We leave him outside during the day (I'm outside 95% of the time, anyway) to keep the geese off the beach. When he needs a break or is done working (when the geese fly away and give up) he comes inside.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#68
We've got many breeds mentioned here and all are different. I only have some knowledge of retrievers . Mine always came to me when called. They weren't fighters. Yet had this happened with one of mine , I'm sure they wouldn't have stopped fighting and say " sure would love to put you out, but Mommy's calling " . Really, how many owners here would truthfully say that if their dog was fighting many yards away... and they called the dog , he'd quit and come ? Mine would if I was near them or at their side.... but a herding dog at a great distance ? Have there ever been training classes on this ? I'm not bashing... just interested. I've broken up " issues" ...but I was there.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#69
I like to point out a few things as well, one of which is that dogs have bad days just like us and sometimes (especially with a breed that is renowned for it's independent, obessive focus as the BC) it takes more than normal to get a response. Am I saying that Dakota was totally in the right and this incident should be brushed off? No. It's apparent that this is another side of recall proofing most of us don't usually have to deal with, and what happens if the chase next time leads out to an open road and the recall command is ignored? That's an obvious rhetorical question.

We don't know what was actually being said between the two dogs. Dakota may have very well still be protecting RD from this dog, even though he had previously sniffed her. However, sniffing and walking away are not obvious threats and Dakota had no reason to respond to those actions. Barking, facing off and snarling, however, are obvious threats and perhaps it was at this time Dakota felt that RD was in need of protection. In that senario, pursuing the dog down the beach and far, far away makes perfect sense.

Occasionally the job does consume the mind. My Aussie's job is to help keep daycare under control, and occassionally I do have to break up fights between other dogs. Sawyer feels he has to jump in and try to help, which does sometimes backfire and put him in harm's way. There have been times where it has taken a couple times of me telling him to leave it (a command he is excellent with) for it to sink in over all the barking. So perhaps I'm biased for a few reasons, the biggest two being that I own a herding breed and understand them and that I've talked with RD enough to know that she knows her stuff and that I have full faith in her and Dakota. On that same note about daycare, I've seen more nipped and ripped ears than I can count and I know first hand how much they bleed and how horrible even the tiniest nick can look at first glance.

So, keep us updated.
 

moonchild1970

Designated Ball Thrower
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
375
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
WA
#71
doberkim said:
what are "his" geese and his livestock - he isnt there to protect these geese, hes there to chase them off, isnt he???

RD said hes being "paid" to keep geese AWAY off the beach. he's not protecting a flock that he stays with all day and keeps safe, hes supposed to be keeping geese AWAY, by chasing them.

Is whether he thought he was protecting them or chasing them away important enough to argue over this badly?

Like I said from the sounds of it, he knew he was performing a job and this uppity dog comes along and trys to start with him. He tried to ignore it and finally the dog either rushed him or bit him or both. That's when Dakota got mad...
But Hey! Wouldn't that in human language also mean, "Let's rumble?"

Anyone that has ever seen a border work knows how focused he/she is on the job and how they DONOT like to be bothered by other dogs.

I've seen many of them try to ignore dogs like that, but like us they all have limits to their patience and to a human what may NOT be acceptable, may indeed be acceptable to a dog. He disciplined the dog and evicted him much as a bouncer in a bar would.

In Dakota's own eyes he probably did right.

I've also noticed a good many breeds that just can't seem to stop themselves from going after Border Collies when they are working or playing with their owners. Is it because they are so focused on their owners that the other dog feels ignored and this makes it mad????
 

Shannerson

New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
157
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Minnesota, USA
#72
I agree completely with you, moonshild. (and your dogs are gorgeous by the way)

A couple posters have quite the liberal mindset of it is all RD's fault. The fact that her dog was actually working and a stray dog broke into a fenced area and posed a threat seems to not even be a factor. It reminds me of the latest news of a child who climbed up over an enclosed area and reached into the animals (I forget what kind of animal or at what zoo) and she got bit. Instead of her parents having the child get rabie shots, 5 of the animals were euthanized. Completely backwards and outrages me. Sorry to get off tract.
 

moonchild1970

Designated Ball Thrower
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
375
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
WA
#73
Thanks and yes it is true.

Now if a man came onto a private propery he would be breaking the law and in some instances owners might think it ok he got bit by their dog, or that they shoot at him with their gun. In some states this is legal too...

But why are so many people freaking out about this stray? If the stray HAD attacked RD would you all still have been jumping down her throat??

Now stop and think, maybe this dog threw out some signals that he was thinking about doing more than growling (like attacking)but only Dakota saw it. Would that make you rethink this then?

None of us were there. So we can't say for sure. So please lighten up on RD!!!
 

elle

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
37
Likes
0
Points
0
#74
Roxy's CD said:
I just like to hear that there are some people out there that could call their dog off WHILE it's in a fight, a fight while protecting something that their passionate about.

Really, though. That's like in coursing, calling a dog off the rabbit :eek:

Uh, yeah right, just not going to happen!

I would love to see a video or hear a story, about a dog being in a fight, than the owner calling them and they come running right away. Because as of now, I can't see it.

Because you know, for example, all those schutzhund dogs out there can never be called off the helper after they get their bite. Must be because they just aren't serious enough about their jobs. :rolleyes:
 

Roxy's CD

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
3,016
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Ontario, Canada
#76
SchH dogs "attack" all the time. They get to "practice" with that as a distraction.. DUH

RD doesn't train with Dakota in dog fights! Acck
 

Doberluv

Active Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
22,038
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
western Wa
#77
A couple posters have quite the liberal mindset of it is all RD's fault. The fact that her dog was actually working and a stray dog broke into a fenced area and posed a threat seems to not even be a factor. It reminds me of the latest news of a child who climbed up over an enclosed area and reached into the animals (I forget what kind of animal or at what zoo) and she got bit. Instead of her parents having the child get rabie shots, 5 of the animals were euthanized. Completely backwards and outrages me. Sorry to get off tract.
That is so on track. Yup, and there's the one where the burgler is breaking into a house and breaks his arm falling off the roof and sues the home owners and WINS! Just like that here. You add to my list of check marks for "agree." Let's see there's Renee, Moonchild....I forget who else.

If I had a ranch and had animals on it and a dog who had a job with those animals.....I don't care if it's for herding, guarding, chasing or anything else, I wouldn't be shocked if my dog defended himself, the animals or me if an intruder made a threatening attack. Dogs are dogs and they have instincts, some stronger than others, some dogs are better trained to human ways than others. All that's pretty moot. The point is that saying it was so "wrong" and abnormal for him to chase the dog so far is, IMO projecting human values and morals onto Dakota. Do you think that dogs wouldn't protect their pack in the wild? Do you think they have a certain distance limit as to how far and how serious they should be? No, that's our opinion. Not theirs. Some dogs don't feel it's serious enough to bother running 300 yards to put a stop to what they perceive as dangerous. Some dogs may think 500 yards is needed. Some, maybe 20 yrds. How can we know what's normal or not? Just because you never saw it? How much study and research has been devoted to this particular behavior to determine what's normal from a dog's standpoint toward another dog in a situation like this?

Those geese are affiliated with the dog. There's some kind of connection. How dare we presume what exactly that connection in the dog's mind is. To say that a dog should and shouldn't do this is based on human values and morals, not a dog's. If the dog doesn't come when called, then his instincts outweighed his training. And that happens sometimes. A herding dog or a dog with a job like this can hardly do his work attached to a leash. He was minding his own business when that other dog got in his face.

I absolutely don't think RD or her dog are irresponsible and I think some of you are way over the top with your accusatory and righteous posts. Dakaota was doing his job in an enclosed place, minding his business, his charges on HIS territory. And this other dog breaks into the place (who knows where HIS owners are) and gets in front of Dakato, face to face (rude in dog language) and barks and growls at him, initiating an attack on Dakota. Dakota was acting like a dog who is threatened, who's job is being interferred with. If he thought he had to run the dog way, way off, then that's what he thought. Dogs are animals. We train them the best we can to obey us. But they're still DOGS. Sure, it would be nice if he would have come when called off. But BCs are known for their intense focus, as it was said.

If I were in RD's shoes and I knew who the owner was, I'd tell them, "It's a shame what happened to your dog. It's too bad you allowed him to run loose and he came through the fence of an enclosed, (is it private property?) area and began an attack on my dog. My dog ran your dog down to teach him never to do that again, never to come back here again.

I can think of a few other breeds who most likely would have done worse if another dog came into their territory and when their mind is set on a task, that's all they see, hear, smell and think about.....nothing else...not water being sprayed on them, not their owner hollering, not anything. Look at the risks wild dogs or wolves go through to kill large game. They risk getting impaled by antlers, getting their guts kicked out, getting stomped on. They run risks and they decide to go through those risks so they can accomplish a task. They ignore everything else so they can focus on the job because if they don't focus, they can be hurt, killed or they'll go hungry. It's how they're designed and some dogs still have much stronger drives and instincts than others.

If Dakota has been obedient in most situations up to now, an unperturbed by other dogs, well socialized, quite far along in his training, as I understand it.... how is RD suppose to know that he won't be in this particular situation? Dogs are living organisms, not robots. If this is a fenced in area (not postitive I got that straight..don't want to go back through all the posts) who would think that some dog would get in? If this is the case, that dogs or anyone can get in, then if it were my dog, knowing what I know NOW (hindsight is always 20/20) then of course, I'd have to perhaps forgo this job and try practicing him in some simulated situations which could condition him to something like this where you could get his attention and get him to come by using smaller distractions than this one and working up to using real dogs, everyone on leashes and get him use to that slowly.

I'm sure the dog will live. I know it seems unfair to US (humans and our code of ethics) that when he turned to retreat, Dakota continued chasing him. but that's not necessarily the way dogs' rules and regulations work. Fighting to the kill is pretty rare in conspecifics. Of course, it happens sometimes. My old neighbor saw an Irish Wolfhound kill a small stray dog who came into their pasture. He may have looked at it like it was prey.

But why are so many people freaking out about this stray? If the stray HAD attacked RD would you all still have been jumping down her throat??
She could wrapped from head to toe in bandages with an I.V. drip and 50 stiches in her body, drooling, writing to us from her hospital bed on her lap top and some (those without bedside manner) would still be jumping down her throat, quite sure.
 
Last edited:

Southpaw

orange iguanas.
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
7,788
Likes
1
Points
38
Age
32
Location
Minnesota
#78
Shannerson said:
It reminds me of the latest news of a child who climbed up over an enclosed area and reached into the animals (I forget what kind of animal or at what zoo) and she got bit. Instead of her parents having the child get rabie shots, 5 of the animals were euthanized. Completely backwards and outrages me. Sorry to get off tract.
They were meerkats...and it really wouldn't surprise me if they sued the zoo. 'Cause you know, it's the zoos fault the parents let their child climb into the exhibit. :rolleyes:

I don't think RD should be blamed for this at all. I'd like to see a dog who wouldn't react to another dog barking and growling at them, while they are in the middle of working. I'm sure Dakota has a great recall but I think it's probably a little more difficult to break up a dog fight! You can train and train all you want but I think a growling dog is way too big of a distraction, and one that you really can't teach them to ignore.
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#79
Thanks for your support, Dakota and I appreciate it. I haven't heard anything about an injured dog being found. I honestly am starting to believe that it was an ear injury - the dog had big floppy ears that would have been easy for Dakota's sharp teeth to split.

There have been a lot of posts and I'm not sure what to address first. I appreciate all of your input, but sorry - nothing you say will convince me that I have an aggressive dog today. This dog has spent all day around several hundred people, working and playing with adults, children and dogs alike. I was watching him closely the entire time and had a 50ft line on him. I saw not even a hint of aggression. EVERYONE and every dog was greeted with tail wags and polite kisses. I really think there was something about this dog that really set him into extreme defense mode.

-Dakota's job is to herd the geese until they fly away. The point of this is that the dog is percieved as a predator and the geese do not want to return to this particular spot. I did not know that he would protect them, but they are BRED to do this and apparently he cannot tell the difference between geese that he is supposed to intimidate into leaving and geese that are HIS.

-The other dog did not stop fighting and simply flee Dakota's attack. The dog was running and snarling, barking and FIGHTING with Dakota behind it pushing it further. As far as I know, as soon as the other dog stopped fighting and fled/hid, Dakota let up and returned to me. He WILL NOT back down, as no Border Collie should. And honestly, if he was protecting his geese/property/me, chasing the other dog off makes SENSE.

-The other dog barked and growled at him. I am not a expert on dog body language and it was dark out, but from what I could tell, this was NOT play. It didn't look friendly at all. It was also not percieved as friendly by a dog that usually loves to play with other dogs and has NEVER shown aggression to a friendly one.

-My dog does not need to protect me from a dog that sniffs me. Those of you that say it was not a defensive attack - WHY would my dog defend me from something that was doing me no harm? He didn't even acknowledge the dog until it got in his face and threatened him. I would be more worried if my dog attacked a dog that didn't even touch me.

I'll be sure to put a muzzle on my vicious dog tonight when I take him for a walk. He could have gone ape-**** at any moment on those dozens of kids that were playing frisbee with him today, wonder why he didn't? :rolleyes: He had a Pug charge him and attempt to bite him, and did nothing more than back away. Why didn't he attack it?

I appreciate your sentiment as well, Doberluv, that dogs are living things and not robots. Dakota is 2 years old and until this incident has had a rock-solid recall. He might have had a bad day, he might have decided that this was absolutely important and he needed to defend whatever it was that he was defending.
For the record.. Not ONCE did he blow off a recall command today. I was able to stop him in the middle of chasing a frisbee that a child threw for him. I was able to stop him while some kids wrestled with him in the water. I was able to send him out at a dead run towards some ducks and call him back. The second he heard the whistle, he turned around and returned to me. I tested him with other dogs, big and small. Recall was good. Thank you Elle for your suggestions on proofing it, I appreciate it.
 

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#80
i don't think RD should be blamed for this and i do believe i said as much quite early on. dakota had never showed any kind of dog-aggression previously and she had no reason to think that he would.

however i do think RD needs to learn from this, and i think she has and is.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top