Animal Cruelty to let your dog kill a raccoon?

LauraLeigh

Active Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
3,752
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Brighton Ontario
#2
Good lord, Mindy would have me in a lot of trouble, twice she has gotten into baby raccoons in the barn and once she killed three before we got to her.... We were NOT hunting her, it was not intentional, but it happened....
 

Taqroy

Active Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
5,566
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Colorado
#3
Seriously? They have nothing better to do than prosecute over this? That guy's dog is gorgeous though....I want him.
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#4
IF what they say in this article is true about him giving the dog the command to kill the racoon and that is illegal because it would technically be using the animal to kill the prey not just track it or retrieve it then they do have grounds to prosecute him.

That's not saying I don't think this is a total waste of time... it is. It's completely ridiculous that this is going to take up court space lol.

but yeah if he did give the dog the command to kill the raccoon then he did technically break the law. It is a law for a reason (not likely THIS reason but...). this really can be a problem. People using their dogs to hunt wild game like deer and what not and especially out of season. that's a big no no. so the law exsists for a reason. I think this is taking it a bit too far but I have to wonder if this guy is a pest control guy that traps raccoons why didn't he just do that? makes me wonder about whether he really did give the dog the command or not. why would he have the dog do it when he could just trap it? that doesn't make sense.
 

Jules

Magic, motherf@%$*#!
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
7,204
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
42
Location
Indiana
#5
IF what they say in this article is true about him giving the dog the command to kill the racoon and that is illegal because it would technically be using the animal to kill the prey not just track it or retrieve it then they do have grounds to prosecute him.

That's not saying I don't think this is a total waste of time... it is. It's completely ridiculous that this is going to take up court space lol.

but yeah if he did give the dog the command to kill the raccoon then he did technically break the law. It is a law for a reason (not likely THIS reason but...). this really can be a problem. People using their dogs to hunt wild game like deer and what not and especially out of season. that's a big no no. so the law exsists for a reason. I think this is taking it a bit too far but I have to wonder if this guy is a pest control guy that traps raccoons why didn't he just do that? makes me wonder about whether he really did give the dog the command or not. why would he have the dog do it when he could just trap it? that doesn't make sense.
I think I am inclined to agree with Sparks on this one (In two threads within a week?! What is going on? LOL).
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#7
Yes, if he gave the command, he technically broke the law . . . but one, don't they have something better to do? Two, it is the law for a good reason, but there should be an exception for vermin and three, "animal cruelty?"
 

LauraLeigh

Active Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
3,752
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Brighton Ontario
#8
After reading the whole article, I admit I was on my phone and skimmed the first time.. I see where you are coming from Sparks, still Very very silly and a waste of court time.. In that there has to be bigger things to worry about, but.... I have to say, being involved in pest control he has no excuse from a law point of view, he would have known the laws (or should have)... Maybe he was just using the dog to locate and the dog finished the raccoon by itself? Unless we hear the clips no way to know...

Also, not sure it is animal cruelty type of incident.... More like illegal/ improper pest control...

ETA... Was typing while you posted Lilavati, that's what I was thinking, stated better... LOL
 

Taqroy

Active Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
5,566
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Colorado
#9
IF what they say in this article is true about him giving the dog the command to kill the racoon and that is illegal because it would technically be using the animal to kill the prey not just track it or retrieve it then they do have grounds to prosecute him.
If he actually gave the dog an order to kill then yeah I agree it's against the law. But the article is kind of ambiguous. The guy says that he sent the dog in to investigate then the prosecutor says they were egging it on. But it makes me wonder what else you're supposed to do when your dog is in a fight with a raccoon. There's no freaking way I'd get in the middle of that. And the animal cruelty charge is fetched.
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#10
What gets under my skin about this is that it reeks of ARists or city folk (or both) who are totally unfamiliar with country life deciding to impose their values through criminal prosecution. On the other hand, I grew up with ratting terriers; we never would have wanted a dog to get into a fight with coon if we could avoid it, but that would have been out of regard for the safety of the dog, not because there was anything "wrong" with it.

Especially since their alternatives don't sound all that humane to me, actually . . . trapping is humane if you are going to relocate the animal, but I'm not sure that having a wild thing in a cage for hours, exposed to a frightening and strange environment before its euthanized is any more humane than a few minute fight with a dog.
 

SarahHound

Active Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
3,120
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
North West Scotland
#11
I agree, letting the dog kill isn't right, not so bad if its done accidentally. I do think it was maybe a bit of an extreme punishment in thie case though.
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#12
I agree the animal cruelty thing I do not get at all lol

I thought the big sentence though that carried jail time was the hunting with a dog out of season thing

yeah animal cruelty makes zero sense but the other one does. I think this might be stretching it a bit and making a mountain out of a mole hill but it really all depends on the voice clips.

it's hard to tell from that article exactly what happened. so he may very well be completely innocent. I'd like to think he wouldn't give the dog the command to go after the raccoon. He knows how to trap them and the dog could have been injured. So I'm inclined to believe this is probably really a bunch of nonsense but if it's not and he did give the dog the command... well that's breaking the law.

and I have to wonder why a neighbor would care enough that a dog got at a raccoon to actually call the police.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#13
I like how if the dog had just randomly found and killed the 'coon, it would "nature" and that's ok. But because there was a human standing around, who had picked up the coon at one point and the dog took it back, it's "fighting" and "abuse". :p
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#14
I like how if the dog had just randomly found and killed the 'coon, it would "nature" and that's ok. But because there was a human standing around, who had picked up the coon at one point and the dog took it back, it's "fighting" and "abuse". :p
yeah I don't get that. if he was just standing there when the dog got the raccoon what was he supposed to do...w restle the dog and the raccoon? LOL

BUT if he did give a command for the dog to get the raccoon and kill it... that's a problem.

but fighting and abuse? No
 

Whisper

Kaleidoscopic Eye
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
13,749
Likes
1
Points
38
Age
32
#15
It's sad that the raccoon died, and I hope it died fast with minimal pain, but this is not what I think of when I think of "animal cruelty." People out here have lots of herding dogs and hunting dogs. From what I've seen, when dogs kill they can be very efficient.

We live in the country and I've had dogs kill rabbits and coons. My Rotties killed them. I've seen it, it's horrible to watch, but they would struggle and within 30 seconds snap the neck. It was a pretty quick end.

That said, I never gave the command to do it, and I later taught them to leave the wildlife alone.

ETA: Agreed with Zoom.
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#16
OH yeah I remember when Belle and Beezer got that baby bunny in the backyard.

it was like SQUEAK SQUEAK DEAD and I was horrified lol I called Brian and said "Your dogs just killed a baby bunny right in front of me... and your MOTHER" LOL
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#17
I'd be in HUGE trouble, because Strider and Kaia have killed 14 raccoons since moving into my parent's house.

Not all raccoons will go into traps. The ones here are trap savvy. At that point, you can do nothing. Poison doesn't work, because cats will get into it. Shooting doesn't work, because we're in city limits. The dogs love chomping them to bits, and the raccoons are preying on neighbor cats and crapping/peeing all over our firewood so I say, have at it.

These are NOT cuddly little Bambi buddies. When they're living in high concentrations in urban areas, most carry rabies, distemper etc. and deadly parasites that are fatal to toddlers if a kid happens to get into their poo. That's BIG deal to us because we've got a 3 year old and the poop covered firewood gets brought inside the house.

*makes note to change attack "command" to "halt! halt!"*
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#18
Who cares whether he gave a command to "kill" or not? It's a blue heeler mix and the kid is 23, I highly doubt he taught the dog such a command. The dog was acting on instinct, the raccoon was taken away from the dog and the dog got it back. It's an animal doing what comes naturally to it, but of course people have to stick their noses in and cry about how horrible that is.

I think it's BS that they're giving him so much crap for this. A raccoon is a pest, no different than the mice and rats that people let their animals kill by the hundreds every day. They are scavengers and leeches and they won't go away unless scared away by a predator or killed.

Down here, raccoons are twice the size of my cats and some are nearly the size of my dog. The ones that are fed daily by the dumb tourists are aggressive and fearless around humans, but they are quite afraid of my dog.

It's also interesting how herding dogs know the difference between a pest that they should kill and an animal they should be kind to. I've had a goat wander onto my property (no idea how a goat got there) and Eve gently maneuvered it back up the hill. Raccoons? She isn't even the same dog. She's broken through a sliding door in an attempt to attack one. Dogs just don't like some animals.
 

sparks19

I'd rather be at Disney
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
28,563
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
42
Location
Lancaster, PA
#19
It's illegal to hunt animals with a dog where the dog is going to do the killing. there is a reason for that. A very valid one. There is a season for raccoons (I have no idea why one would put a SEASON on those things but whatever lol). he hunts with the dog (although presumably not with the dog doing the killing just the tracking or retrieving) so it's possible the dog does have an attack command... who knows until we see the clips we won't know for sure.

Do I think this is abuse of a law... sure I guess... it's definitely a little overblown.

But whether you have reason to get rid of them or not... you can't kill them with a dog and out of season.. it's technically against the law.

might it be worth it to challenge this law to get rid of the raccoon... sure it probably is but you gotta be prepared to fight it because it is technically breaking the law

NOT abuse or cruelty though. that's just stupidity

I personally think this is a waste of everyones time. The courts, the jurors, the prosecutor, the accussed. WAste of time. But I can see where they might have a case with the dog killing the raccoon thing.

it's not cause I'm a bleeding heart or I just can't stand that the wittle bitty waccoon died. it's not that at all. but people using dogs to kill wild game (and raccoons are wild game in most areas) is against the law... and out of season. and believe it or not but it really is a PROBLEM in some areas
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#20
It's illegal to hunt animals with a dog where the dog is going to do the killing. there is a reason for that. A very valid one. There is a season for raccoons (I have no idea why one would put a SEASON on those things but whatever lol). he hunts with the dog (although presumably not with the dog doing the killing just the tracking or retrieving) so it's possible the dog does have an attack command... who knows until we see the clips we won't know for sure.

Do I think this is abuse of a law... sure I guess... it's definitely a little overblown.

But whether you have reason to get rid of them or not... you can't kill them with a dog and out of season.. it's technically against the law.

might it be worth it to challenge this law to get rid of the raccoon... sure it probably is but you gotta be prepared to fight it because it is technically breaking the law

NOT abuse or cruelty though. that's just stupidity

I personally think this is a waste of everyones time. The courts, the jurors, the prosecutor, the accussed. WAste of time. But I can see where they might have a case with the dog killing the raccoon thing.

it's not cause I'm a bleeding heart or I just can't stand that the wittle bitty waccoon died. it's not that at all. but people using dogs to kill wild game (and raccoons are wild game in most areas) is against the law... and out of season. and believe it or not but it really is a PROBLEM in some areas
Yes, it is. But poaching isn't the problem here. Nor is this something like bear baiting. Actually, what I want to know is whether ratting with terriers is legal there . . . Not that I'm planning to taking it up, but now I'm curious.

I do understand about it being technically against the law . . . but I'm strongly inclined to think that someone objected to the event and then went and found a law to use, rather than this being someone enforcing the law, per se.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top