It completely makes sense. And it is something I've discussed with a lot of dog people lately in regards to my next dog.
Meg is soft to a degree most people don't ever have to deal with. I got in her way when she was weaving one day, she weaved into my leg, got "kicked" (not intentionally, and not nearly hard enough to hurt her) and she bolted out of the field, and refused to come back in. It took time, her best dog friend, and McDonalds to get her back to working in that space.
Hence my threat that my next agility dog was going to be a cattle dog/kelpie/JRT/wolf cross. I said my rule of thumb was that if my dog got stepped on on-course, it wanted it to bite me, not run.
But I don't really
. I can work with soft. I can make it better. I can use it to my advantage at times, and I firmly think soft is connected to self-awareness and self-preservation in a certain way. Her natural proprioception is better than any dog I know. I like that. Meg knows exactly where her body is at all times because she is worried about it being the wrong spot. She won't put herself in a dangerous position on an agility course (or else where) because she doesn't want hurt. I don't worry about gambles like a dog walk at a distance (which a lot of people pulled their dogs from a few weeks ago siting it as dangerous) because I know she won't put herself at risk. And the dog Does Not Pull Bars.
While there will always be dogs who defy the rules, I know that I am more comfortable, both living and "working" with a dog who falls on the soft cautious side of things.
This thread detour was brought to you by the Vermont Department of Tourism and BostonBanker. I hope you enjoyed the journey.
opcorn: