Fran27 said:
They were bred as hypoallergenic dogs that would have the retriever properties of labs. The thing is, the project was cancelled because it didn't work so well, and mostly the breed did nothing better than other breeds could do, plus the hypoallergenic/non shedding part never really worked either. As such it is *not* recognized by the Australian Kennel Club.
So mostly the breeders who keep breeding them are in for money, in my opinion, as there is no standard nor is it a recognized breed.
Just figured I would get the facts straight...
They are cute, I just wouldn't support that kind of breeding, that has no purpose except making money.
Woopsie - when I did the research on them what I read had said they
were recognised! The site that I looked at was one of the original breeders of labradoodles, who bred them to be hypoallergenic guide dogs. I didn't know there had been all of those problems. And ours certainly were nowhere near as expensive as the breeders we rang for standard poodles (or labs for that matter). We paid around $650 in total for ours, and the breeders I rang for poodle puppies were about $800 each.
We are lucky, too, in that ours don't shed any hair, and so far have been hypoallergenic!! Perhaps in Australia the breed is a little more regulated?? I don't know...but I'm glad you pointed that out to me....
I guess we're lucky that we managed to get such a good example of labradoodles, I'm sure there are really dodgy ones out there.
I do think, however, that the schnoodle, spoodle etc etc is taking things a bit far. But then again, isn't that how many breeds came about? By interbreeding the best features of separate breeds? I have to say I'm not very knowledgeable about it...