Seems to me with the number of animals seized in many of the examples they gave, that they did deserve some form of write up requiring less animals and more adequate conditions, but not full seizure of all the animals. But I can't yet buy into the idea every example they gave cared for their dogs like we do or more respectable show breeders. Some were skinny, some certainly needed grooming, and could have better conditions.
The person with the 'animal sanctuary' was probably the best and safest example. Besides having some feces in the pens(uhmm.. have people ever been to a shelter, I see more feces in shelters during open hours on a regular basis than that individual rescuer's outdoor pens), I really did not see a single animal I would have considered abused or neglected. But with many of the breeders shown, they certainly needed less animals and better care for their dogs.