why do they bite?

Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
2,365
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
High Ridge, MO
#21
All dogs bite. It just depends on the circumstances.

ETA: I read some of the other posts, and wanted to add something. I've been around the breed since my single digits. I've taken bites from APBT, a Dogo, a Rottweiler. I've never seen a dog clamp down with the intent to do damage. All of the dog-to-human bites I've seen were a single bite just like any other breed would do. A dog biting down on a human and engaging in an extended attack is rare.
 

Maxy24

Active Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
8,070
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
32
Location
Massachusetts
#22
“We saw them hitting it with the leash and, like, beating the dog, hard,” said Joey Inacio, 15, who was walking home at the time. “They were hitting (the dog). It was just sitting there. It, like, put its head down a couple of times.”
I love how the news "fails" to mention that :rolleyes: No wonder the dog bit him, If I were a dog so would I. Now they are going to PTS the dog for defending herself.

Sorry I have not replied, I've been at school. This reminds me of what I'm learning in English class. We are learning about biased and how the media puts facts in the news but chooses which to include and how to phrase it (the teacher used the example of the famous car race where I think the Russians won, they said the USA came in second to last, USA said they came in second, They left out the fact that there were only three cars in the race) So the dog bit while being brought home by his owners but the news fails to mention they were beating him. It makes sense (in a cruel way) since they said the dog had just ran away and they had caught her so they probably were "teaching" her not to run away again, like my dad used to do to Max (until I made him stop, and guess what the one time he ran away after I made dad stop was the last time he tried, plus I taught him the come and stay command) some people need beatings and to have animal ownership right taken away.

I guess I just mostly feel that there is never any dog attacks in the news (TV news I'm referring to) other than "Pit Bulls" and wanted to know whether the news chose to ignore those or they were not happening as much. And if they were not as frequent as pit attacks then why is it so. Thanks for all your replies, keep them coming!
 

Boemy

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
2,481
Likes
0
Points
0
#23
In other threads people have mentioned how there are . . . I think they called them "faux labradors" or "mock labradors" . . . They are purebred, but have been bred poorly by puppy mills or BYBs and do not have the proper labrador temperament. They're often hyperactive and snappish. They're often dog aggressive, human aggressive, or both, even when properly raised (no abuse, socialized, etc). They look like labs, but their temperament is completely wrong for a lab.

I think this is happening with pit bulls too. The people who originally created the breed, the dog fighters, had an excellent reason to discourage human aggression . . . They had to get excited, fighting dogs in and out of the ring without getting mauled. "Man-eaters die," etc. They selectively bred them to be extremely friendly towards people.

Today pit bulls are popular among people who idolize the "macho" ideal. Do you think those people are going to say, "Oh no, my dog is aggressive towards humans! I'd better not breed him because that's not what a pit bull should do!"? Ha ha, no way! They'll probably be proud of the dog and brag about how "badass" it is. Then they'll breed it and sell the puppies to other wannabe ganstas. The majority of pit bull breeders are BYBs, not reputable breeders. They are no longer breeding to discourage human aggressiveness and, I suspect, are purposely breeding FOR human aggressiveness in many cases.

Just because pit bulls were originally bred to be non-aggressive towards human does not mean their temperament is set in stone . . . I think BYBs are actively screwing up this breed.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#24
Good posts Maxy & Boemy.

Maxy, you are absolutely right. The media is not actually there to put the facts on the table so to speak. They are there to make headlines, to gain viewers and/or readers, & to bring their bosses home a nice profit. It's all about money, not the truth.

And Boemy, you are exactly right. Back yard breeders have ruined these dogs. They either a) breed for a crappy temperament all in the name of "protection" or b) they are too busy breeding for color & head size that temperament is completely overlooked in the efforts to produce the biggest & baddest dog in the 'hood. Not to mention the fact that these dogs are so grossly out of standard that they are now confused with many many many different breeds & no one really knows what the dog's breed truly is.

I have sympathy for any & all innocent dog bite victim. No one deserves to have to go through the physical & emotional trauma that a dog attack brings (again I'm speaking of people who did nothing to warrant a bite). But what hurts me the most is that victims of other breed & mixed breed attacks don't get the attention their situation deserves thus these dogs get to slide. There is no demand to ban these other breeds & there even isn't a public backlash demanding enforcement of leash laws. These victims are literally hushed & sent away to mend themselves somewhere else.

I'm all for justice in terms of dog attacks. Regardless of breed. Bust most of all, I'm all for pushing the government to step up & take a stand against people who refuse to abide by leash laws whether it be their dog or cat. I'm all for these people having their pets confiscated & not given back & for these people to pay a very hefty fine. I'm all for owners of dogs that fatally attacked someone to be accountable in the court of law & be forced to do jail time. I'm all for it. But what I'm not for is for someone to claim they are "frightened" to go get their mail because I live a mile away & own APBTs thus giving the government to come in, take my dogs, & kill them.
 

DryCreek

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
428
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
The Great White North
#25
Maxy, are you talking about the attack that happened in Taunton Mass.? I'm pretty sure you are because of where you live *wink*. I had heard that the 10 and 12 year old boys were wrestling with the dog when the dog started biting because the boys were getting to rough and physical with him.
Alls I have to say to this incident is where is the parents? HERES some of the story
http://www.wbz.com/pages/270397.php?contentType=4&contentId=352323
Just found an update on that story.....

http://enterprise.southofboston.com/articles/2007/03/08/news/news/news03.txt

Dog officer spares life of 'provoked' pit bull



By Donna Kulpa, Enterprise correspondent

TAUNTON — Angel, the small brown-haired pit bull that garnered fame by attacking two city residents after witnesses said she was provoked, is going to live.

Witnesses have come forward and said the 35-pound pit bull was beaten before it attacked a 10-year-old boy and a 65-year-old man last week, Animal Control Officer Manny Massa said Wednesday.

“I'm not going to euthanize the dog as three or four people whose names are being withheld at this point have stepped forward willing to sign statements that the dog was beaten,” Massa said.

The dog will be quarantined through Sunday at the Taunton Animal Shelter after biting Steven Sousa, 10, and Louis D'Addario, 65, on Indian Meadow Drive last Thursday.

Sousa said he was strolling alongside his friend, Aaron Jacinto, 12, of Taunton, who was walking the dog, when it turned on him.

Sousa received 14 stitches in his left forearm.

Neighbors told The Enterprise the two boys had been hitting the dog before the attack.

“We saw them hitting it with the leash and, like, beating the dog, hard,” said Joey Inacio, 15, who was walking home at the time last week. “They were hitting (the dog). It was just sitting there. It, like, put its head down a couple of times.”

D'Addario told The Enterprise he responded during the attack to help Sousa.

“I kicked the dog twice, and the dog looked at me like I was crazy, and it came after me,” D'Addario said last week.

He received a bite wound on his right forearm, but did not require stitches.

Both Sousa and his mother, Suzanne Fagundes of Taunton, denied that he hit the dog.

Massa recently obtained the statements by witnesses.

“We've had dogs that have mauled people (that have) been put down, but you have to go with all the facts and we didn't have all the facts” until now, said Massa.

Massa said charges are not being brought against anyone at this point.

When the attack happened, Marybeth and Joseph Jacinto of Taunton were looking after the dog for a friend, police said.

The dog's owner is Tiffany Galavotti of New Bedford, police said.

Massa said that hopefully the dog will go home to Galavotti once he obtains paperwork from her that states her landlord will allow her to have the dog and clearance from the New Bedford animal control officer.

Otherwise, “I'll have the owner sign off on the dog, and we will keep the dog here until we find her a home,” said Massa.
 

ravennr

ಥ⌣ಥ
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
2,314
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Oakville, ON
#26
Awesome news DryCreek, but I don't think her chances on finding a home are very good. It'd be nice if the ACO that spared her life would adopt her, though.
 

Maxy24

Active Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
8,070
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
32
Location
Massachusetts
#27
Thank, I'm glad to here she will be spared, I do hope she finds a home. She looks like a sweet dog, she is brindle. They showed her on the news sitting in the cage, If I were to get a pit bull it would look just like her.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
776
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
uk
#28
They do, the media just get a better reaction from "OMG pit bull attack". With all this attention they are bound to only report things about breeds which are seen as bad. This also isn't helped by the bad breeders who go out and buy pit bulls to look 'tough'.

Pit bulls before were excellent with humans, they had to be as they would be picked up by different humans the whole time during the fight.
 

ravennr

ಥ⌣ಥ
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
2,314
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Oakville, ON
#29
Isn't it a bit ironic that these attacks only seemed to become a huge issue after dog fighting was outlawed? I don't condone the sport at all, but I respect the breed's history; I do just find it sad that we can view those things as bad, using common sense, but so many breeders (those who do not breed for fighting, not the ones who do) still breed these dogs with horrible temperaments and no testing. :(

It just makes absolutely no sense to me.
 

DryCreek

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
428
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
The Great White North
#30
Historically speaking....

Breeders of fighting dogs had a vested interest in not allowing human aggressive dogs to be bred for obvious reasons. Who would want a dog to jump over the other dog only to attack the guy in the other corner?

Nowadays....

A lot of breeders are only in it for the money and they could care less how the dog acts as long as they get their cash. As with many other breeds, BYB's have destroyed the stability that these dogs were bred for originally.

There are still good breeders out there that work their dogs (weight pulling, agility etc...) and only allow dogs with excellent temperaments, health and conformation to be bred.

Unfortunately, as long as you can buy pups for 50 bucks out of the paper or the back of a van the trend of unstable animals will probably continue.:mad:
 

pitbulliest

Active Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
1,112
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
39
Location
Toronto, Canada
#31
The APBT has been plagued with negative publicity a lot recently. There are at least 25 other purebred dogs that can be misidentified as an APBT as well as many crosses/mixes that have similar characteristics. Few people are truly able to correctly identify this breed. In the midst of an attack, in a panic situation, if they see a dog with short hair, muscles, and a boxy head they think automatically "Pit Bull". Not always true but with the negativity surrounding the breed I can understand their reaction.

I am in no way saying that there are no attacks done by the APBT, just pointing out that "Pit Bull" is such a generic term that it can include many different breeds and crosses of dog.

There are other dogs that attack and if you google news with dog bite or dog attack in your search, you will find more than just the "Pit Bull" It's just that when people hear "Pit Bull" they want to read what happened. They actually seem to enjoy hearing bad things about these animals. It a name that sells and interests people whether it's positive or negative.

Now, in regards to the APBT's that do bite. When it comes to raising these dogs, it should be top priority to socialize well. They can be protective of their owners and territory and if not taught that all humans are acceptable, you have a possibly dangerous situation. If a dog is kept isolated from others, it learns to fear other humans as possible threats. If owners of these dogs don't raise them properly, as with any breed, they become a risk. It's just unfortunate that they are larger than a shih tzu so can cause more damage when they do bite. Side note, all those reports you read about PSI levels for dog bites are out of wack. All dogs fall within the same range of power, about 230 PSI. The APBT usually holds and shakes, while a lot of other breeds will bite, let go, bite, let go, etc. Each type of bite causes different kinds of damage.

Now, we all realize that bad owners who raise them to be aggressive need to be removed from the picture. That's a given. A lot of the attacks that you hear of are free roaming unaltered animals. Bad situation on all counts.

There is also the BYB's that are in it for the money, so temperament testing their dogs doesn't even come into the picture. This creates an instability in the breed that has proven to be dangerous to people and to the breed itself. It never used to be this way, they were known as nanny dogs and could be trusted implicitly. It's a sad state of affairs.

All in all, these dog are not for everyone. Unless you have a lot of experience with raising smart, strong willed dogs, and train diligently, you may be setting up our breed for extinction.

When the APBT became the new fad breed to own, it was only a matter of time until problems arose. It happened with GSD's, Rott's, Dobie's and I'm sure, other breeds as well. To me, proper education about the breed instead of emotional reactions to news stories will, in the end, save these fine animals from extinction. At least, I'm hoping it will. I have never owned a better breed of animal. If bred and raised properly, they make fantastic animals that I take great pride in owning. I love my dogs above and beyond all the bad press they get, and as many others who own them will say, there is no other breed that I will love as much.
"And all that jazz!"

Excellent post..you said it perfectly :)
 

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#32
well I'm watching the news and they have a story about a APBT that bit a kid while he and the owner were walking him home after he ran away. The pitty bit the boy and a man who was getting him off by kicking (don't blame him). Then my brother says see pit bulls are evil (as I always tell my family they are good) of course I defend them, but the truth is I don't know why you always hear about Pit bulls attacking people and never any other breeds. At first I though maybe he was not even a pit but was a mix but he was clearly a APBT or Amstaff. So why do they bite? I know it is irresponsible owners and all that but I know all the other breeds have irresponsible owners too but why don't you hear about them nearly as much as with pits. It could be because a pit bull has so many breeds in the genre and because a lot of people who thenk pits are prone to bite get them because they actually want an aggressive dog and train them to be so, but why do you think they are always in the news and other breeds are not? Please don't turn this in to an argument or attack every body who apposes your view post, that was not my intension, but to be able to defend the breed after they bite I need to know why they always do it and other breeds don't.
a lot of the irresponsible owners pick "dangerous" breeds. and treat them badly in order too look tough. plus, you would have heard about othe rbreeds attacking people, only they dont specify the breed. they just say "dog"

"dog mauls child" it might have been a beagle or a chi or a cocker. so saying "dog" is more sensationalist'
but when a pit is involved, its the perfect chance to envoke more prejudice against the breed.
people are more lilely to read "dog bites child" then "fed up-annoyed lab nips kid"
and they are more likley to read "pitbull takes life" because of allt he background information allready
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top