Nikki, I absolutely agree. Actually, there are people who, as I've said before, would not touch my dog's pedigree with a ten generation pole because of possible handler aggression and/or general tendencies to redirect on the handler. A lot of it really is unfair handling, or just poor handling or understanding of the dog itself.
I definitely don't think it should be a desired trait for the breed, and I don't believe that it is one, either. I just find it interesting, reading this thread, that talk of a "good GSD" as likened to a Malinois is closely followed by descriptions of scars, scabs, and dogs that express their demands in very physical ways. I found it odd because I do not typically hear any of those traits being offered up voluntarily, and in a positive light, when I hear people talk about good German Shepherds. Whether or not the dog possesses those traits is one thing, but the fact that it is toted as a norm and a fun, impressive trait to have in a dog is another.
I'm definitely not saying it's a right or wrong way to view either breed, just that I feel like there are some differences that ought to be drawn by someone coming from another perspective. "Good" in itself is obviously subjective, and in the end a ton of this is all a matter of semantics. I was just surprised by the consensus and wanted to voice that, because I personally found it interesting.
I think I was trying to say a lot of what you did in your post, just completely incoherently and in a rather off putting way
I definitely don't think it should be a desired trait for the breed, and I don't believe that it is one, either. I just find it interesting, reading this thread, that talk of a "good GSD" as likened to a Malinois is closely followed by descriptions of scars, scabs, and dogs that express their demands in very physical ways. I found it odd because I do not typically hear any of those traits being offered up voluntarily, and in a positive light, when I hear people talk about good German Shepherds. Whether or not the dog possesses those traits is one thing, but the fact that it is toted as a norm and a fun, impressive trait to have in a dog is another.
I'm definitely not saying it's a right or wrong way to view either breed, just that I feel like there are some differences that ought to be drawn by someone coming from another perspective. "Good" in itself is obviously subjective, and in the end a ton of this is all a matter of semantics. I was just surprised by the consensus and wanted to voice that, because I personally found it interesting.
I think I was trying to say a lot of what you did in your post, just completely incoherently and in a rather off putting way