Someone please explain this to me before I get really upset....
- Thread starter bogolove
- Start date
They have plenty of choices. Just because some one's grand father fought dogs doesn't mean he has to. It's ludicrous to think that he has to do something because someone else did. A grown man can choose for himself, and if he chooses to fight dogs, then it's his doing; not his grandfather's. Dog fighting is sick and cruel, and anyone who believes in dog fighting needs mental help.
- Joined
- May 2, 2005
- Messages
- 63
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 0
Look, although most of you think you know every point of view to someone who dogfights think again,there are most who do it for fun for reputation for money, others do it for heritage in third world countries how else do you earn respect?Does that make it right? absolutly not, there is not one way that it is right but there is always a second story to tell when theres a first......
Saw that thread few months ago, made me very angry. These people have nothing better to do then to ruin reputations of others breeds, and breeders.
They slander breeders so they can sell their own dogs better.
I hate reading posts like that simply for the reason of them slandering my dogs breed. Makes me sick.
Pit v. CO? Makes me want to barf.
They slander breeders so they can sell their own dogs better.
I hate reading posts like that simply for the reason of them slandering my dogs breed. Makes me sick.
Pit v. CO? Makes me want to barf.
Bulloxer01 said:
No need to be hasty 
but i bet your whole family wernt TOO comfortable with the fact that they all are and you arent
but i bet your whole family wernt TOO comfortable with the fact that they all are and you arent
I never heard of someone being killed for refusing to fight dogs
Bulloxer.
i will start this post by saying that it is an extremely weak and unrespected man who does something to make someone else happy. if my father told me he would be upset and feel i was disrespectful for not doing something im afraid i would tell him to bugger off.
i wish anyone who forces dogs to fight, as long, painful and slow a death as those poor dogs endure. im sorry but thats the way it is. i believe in payback and i KNOW these barbaric idiots will get some.
thses animals are starved both of food and love, treated like sh*te and then thrown into a ring where there only option is to defend themselves. THAT is not on, it is the most cruel nasty and downright ignorant thing i have heard of in my entire life.
i will start this post by saying that it is an extremely weak and unrespected man who does something to make someone else happy. if my father told me he would be upset and feel i was disrespectful for not doing something im afraid i would tell him to bugger off.
i wish anyone who forces dogs to fight, as long, painful and slow a death as those poor dogs endure. im sorry but thats the way it is. i believe in payback and i KNOW these barbaric idiots will get some.
thses animals are starved both of food and love, treated like sh*te and then thrown into a ring where there only option is to defend themselves. THAT is not on, it is the most cruel nasty and downright ignorant thing i have heard of in my entire life.
I had run into this website a while ago and was sickend as usual at how low we humans will go in the name of sport.
First off these people are not fighting for tradition, read their posts and you will see that. It is for ego, selfishness, and money. To pit two different types of dogs against each other is not a "sport" in any country that I am aware of. Breed on breed fighting may still be acceptable in some cultures but it doesn't have to be tolerated by me and having your own opinion does not make one ignorant. It means I have looked at all the angles and in my mind am not able to excuse something so cruel. How would you like to be put in a pit and forced to fight to the death to save your own hide? If some culture had done that for years and years (like the gladiators) that still doesn't mean it was something that was a good, humane, idea. I would think that people could come up with more ways to have a good time other than killing mans best friend.
First off these people are not fighting for tradition, read their posts and you will see that. It is for ego, selfishness, and money. To pit two different types of dogs against each other is not a "sport" in any country that I am aware of. Breed on breed fighting may still be acceptable in some cultures but it doesn't have to be tolerated by me and having your own opinion does not make one ignorant. It means I have looked at all the angles and in my mind am not able to excuse something so cruel. How would you like to be put in a pit and forced to fight to the death to save your own hide? If some culture had done that for years and years (like the gladiators) that still doesn't mean it was something that was a good, humane, idea. I would think that people could come up with more ways to have a good time other than killing mans best friend.
Last edited:
If that is your point of view then that is basically the same thing as saying "Hey let's bring the holocost back since our ancestors did it." I know you are thinking well those are people and we are talking about dogs, but I value a dog's life, and everyone else on this forum does too, and it is wrong and inhumane just as killing people is no matter what the tradition. The holocost was wrong, dog fighting is wrong, cannibalism is wrong. It is wrong to kill innocent people, and it is wrong to kill animals. Now I may have a different opinion of the people who are out to hurt innocent people and animals.
Tell you what, if you can talk two of these guys who have no balls into getting into a pit with each other and fighting to the death, I will at least listen to your opinion. But since that would never happen because they have to use dogs to make up for their lack of manhood, I will stick to my own. Thanks anyway.
By the way, if you think about it, suicide bombers have been around for years and the young people that do it were taught by their parents that it was ok to do and ok to kill people for their cause and religion. Does that mean 911 was justifiable to you?
I have considered the opinion you had and what I find ignorant is that anyone would even agree to such an inhumane opinion. I find it rather pathetic.
I understand that there are different points, but I also understand the ignorance of killing animals and people. There is NO excuse for killing a dog in a dog fight. NONE. The people that do it are ignorant, low class individuals who are in desperate need for some money so they do not care who they harn in the process. Just like the people who mug people, kill people for money, rob convenience stores, break into people's houses, etc.
You are so high up on your little soap box that you don't even realize you are the one being hypocritical. You are preaching to us about listening to other opinions, and you yourself are not abiding by your own opinion. Nothing is worse than a person who is contradicting themselves. Except a person who fights animals because they don't have the balls to fight themselves.
You are so high up on your little soap box that you don't even realize you are the one being hypocritical. You are preaching to us about listening to other opinions, and you yourself are not abiding by your own opinion. Nothing is worse than a person who is contradicting themselves. Except a person who fights animals because they don't have the balls to fight themselves.