Score One for Our Side

Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
4,381
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Midwest
#3
Finally, i'm actually surprised this isn't done nationally. Since dogs are considered property, you can't deem it "dangerous" without it causing some action of being dangerous.

Like you can own fertilizer if you're a farm, but if you blow up a few storage sheds, they can take it away from you. Or if you own a car that goes 200 MPH, you can't say it's dangerous and ban it, unless you drive it in a dangerous manner.

I'm very surprised that breed bans have lasted this long. I don't think they are constitutional, but i'm no lawyer. But if you can't deem property dangerous without cause, i don't know how BSL ever flew in the first place.
 

milos_mommy

Active Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
15,349
Likes
0
Points
36
#5
Nice!

So apparently this breed ban banned dogs with the term "pit" or "bull" in their breed name. THAT'S HOW THEY WORD THAT? Doesn't American Staffordshire Terrier NOT have the term "bull" or "pit" in their name?? And doesn't that ban french bulldogs, english bulldogs, etc?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top