Discussion in 'Dogs - General Dog Chat' started by Teal, Aug 27, 2011.
You explained it perfectly.
FYI to whoever is still reading this thread:
Earlier I asked what was the point of Teal's last reply, and I got a PM response (not from Teal) saying that Dianna had threatened to sue Teal if she did not post saying Dianna was not at fault.
I don't do heresay, so I asked Dianna if this was true via email. Here is the response I received earlier today, in its entirety, which you can see Dianna says is okay to share:
Thank you Danefield, that explains it pretty well IMO. So sad that it seems the only thing Teal feels is the need to cover her own rear
Anyone who is in contact with Dianna, please let her know that her original post became "moderated". Once we saw it, we approved it and put it in the appropriate thread. She is free to post at will here.
This bears repeating. How ANYONE can think Teal is not responsible for the condition the puppy was in in those photos is beyond me.
Thank you for posting that Danefied. I sincerely hope that this thread and its information makes the rounds in the biggest way possible.
Separate names with a comma.