No Bulldog or Pekenese will Compete at Crufts

lizzybeth727

Active Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
6,403
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Central Texas

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
They all moaned about the docking ban, and claimed they wouldn't show (etc etc). They did.
 

puppydog

Tru evil has no pantyline
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
7,500
Likes
0
Points
0
I am so glad that the nepotism and BS that is the dog showing world is FINALLY being exposed!
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
Oh... it's just a small corner of that world. There is a certain madness that comes with taking dogs too seriously and at the same time not seriously enough at all. :D
The madness comes from treating dogs as genetic sculpture.

You see the same thing with other, smaller, show animals. The terrifying thing is that dogs are getting into the same range of crippling distortion that used to be the domain of the goldfish people and pigeon people.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
I just want to say this thread has made me appreciate this forum so much. All over the internet and on forums people are FLIPPING out about this and it felt like a breath of fresh air reading on this thread.
Me, too. I've been specifically avoiding this thread because I'm SO done with the discussions I've seen/been foolish enough to participate in elsewhere. Then I saw someone mention in another thread say there wasn't much controversy in this one and wandered in to check it out... I feel like I've just returned from CrazyLand.
 

Shai

& the Muttly Crew
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,215
Likes
0
Points
36
Me, too. I've been specifically avoiding this thread because I'm SO done with the discussions I've seen/been foolish enough to participate in elsewhere. Then I saw someone mention in another thread say there wasn't much controversy in this one and wandered in to check it out... I feel like I've just returned from CrazyLand.
But! But! Flashlights are highly technical pieces of medical equipment and using one proves the vet is Evil Incarnate!

:p hehe
 
M

mutts

Guest
So is everyone on this thread kind of anti-dog showing?? Just curious. What exactly happened to that mastiff in the picture?? Forgive me for my ignorance....
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
4,381
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Midwest
Not against showing, but what it has become, especially at the more "prestigeous" levels. Lots of waste and ruin in order to get the genetic freaks and exremes that win. I think Dogs should be healthy, and utilitarian, along with loyal and stable. They should fit a general set of guidelines to be called a breed.

This pervasive and perverted thought that an extra wrinkle here and a more droopy face there and a nose that actually is retracted into the face rather than a snout or a bit more angle in these bones, etc, to get the most extreme out there is actually the "best" a breed has to offer???

Sorry, I'll never subscribe to that utter bullshit.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
7,099
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Illinois
I know, right? The REAL issue here is whether the vet used a flashlight or not. :/
I was reading that thread and trying to figure out if it would have been ok to pick the bulldog up and hold it next to a lightbulb instead of using a high tech tool like a flashlight
 
M

mutts

Guest
release the hounds-- I agree with you 100%
How can a person allow that animal go through so much pain and still be allowed to judge? He can't even judge when his own dog needs to go to the veterinarian. It's disgusting.
I've never particularly liked the idea of dog showing (especially the more prestigious shows) and now I've lost even more respect for the idea of showing.
It makes me glad that I have a mutt of unknown heritage rather then these sickly, monstrous looking animals being shown. I feel so bad for the animals. They have no choice in all of this.
 

Shai

& the Muttly Crew
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,215
Likes
0
Points
36
For the person who asked -- no I at least am not against showing per se. I do dislike how the current show system seems to reward and perpetuate extreme types. In terms of evaluating breeding stock on the "form" side of things I see more value in having a 3rd party breed savvy panel assess individuals for breed type/correct structure and designated some sort of pass/fail system with written critique of the dog's physical strengths/weaknesses. This system of picking a single dog from a group of good examples of the breed seems to distort some people's perception of reality. This is of course not true for all breeds or all breeders within any breed but it's still far too prevalent.
 

Shai

& the Muttly Crew
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,215
Likes
0
Points
36
I know, right? The REAL issue here is whether the vet used a flashlight or not. :/
And the funny thing is that the exhibitors (and everyone else) were told prior to the event that certain eye conditions would be on the list of things checked. To check for those eye conditions requires adequate light. Insufficient ambient light was available to check for the promised conditions so auxillary light was supllied so they could do as promised. It's not like they used it to check things not on the list, like verifying useful dentition, so far as I know.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
I was reading that thread and trying to figure out if it would have been ok to pick the bulldog up and hold it next to a lightbulb instead of using a high tech tool like a flashlight
I was thisclose to saying something almost exactly like this, but I abandoned the thread instead.

And the funny thing is that the exhibitors (and everyone else) were told prior to the event that certain eye conditions would be on the list of things checked. To check for those eye conditions requires adequate light. Insufficient ambient light was available to check for the promised conditions so auxillary light was supllied so they could do as promised. It's not like they used it to check things not on the list, like verifying useful dentition, so far as I know.
BUT IT WAS AGAINST THE RULES! Or... possibly not. :/
 

lizzybeth727

Active Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
6,403
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Central Texas
You see the same thing with other, smaller, show animals. The terrifying thing is that dogs are getting into the same range of crippling distortion that used to be the domain of the goldfish people and pigeon people.
I'm trying to imagine the people in the movie "Best in Show" with, instead of dogs, goldfish. *snort* :rofl1:

Yeah, I never even know that there's a whole Goldfish Conformation Show world.

So is everyone on this thread kind of anti-dog showing?? Just curious.
No, in fact many of us show (or plan to show) our own dogs. Just, we have healthy dogs, and keeping our breeds healthy is more important than getting show titles.
 

Moth

Mild and Slightly Nutty
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
5,039
Likes
2
Points
38
Location
Madison, WI
So is everyone on this thread kind of anti-dog showing?? Just curious. What exactly happened to that mastiff in the picture?? Forgive me for my ignorance....
No, not anti-show here, but I believe that if you are going to show and breed you should do it with the best interest of the animals that you are working with/for at heart. Sometimes people forget that winning is not the important part of showing.

That being said...it's like anything else...there is good and bad out there in the world of dogs. The thing is with some things we see more of the bad these days and we really need a change for the good :)

I have been following this thread with great interest...
 

Dizzy

Sit! Good dog.
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
17,761
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Wales
I want to go to crufts next year. Will see how the KC pans out over the next year... and I can't imagine they will keep the mastiff judge after the exposure gets out.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top