Article:
http://alternativemediasyndicate.co...d-to-let-police-enter-homes-without-warrants/
Proposed Bill:
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2015/pdf/HB/1200-1299/HB1261IN.pdf
Questionable Parts of Bill:
Cops already shoot dogs way too much, I dread the law that explicitly makes it LEGAL for them to do so.
http://alternativemediasyndicate.co...d-to-let-police-enter-homes-without-warrants/
Proposed Bill:
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2015/pdf/HB/1200-1299/HB1261IN.pdf
Questionable Parts of Bill:
(8) In order to determine if there is a violation of this
186
section, a law enforcement officer, at any time, may enter the
187
premises where a dangerous dog is kept, or is believed to be kept,
188
for an on
-
site inspection of the premises.
189
SECTION 4.
(1) I
f a dog is determined by a law enforcement
190
officer to be a dangerous dog, then the dog may be destroyed by
191
the law enforcement officer, or his designee, provided that two
192
(2) of the following requirements are met:
193
(a) The dog is running at large or not
under proper
194
restraint when on the premises of its owner, or leashed, muzzled
195
and under the direct control of the owner when off the premises of
196
the owner, as required under this act;
197
(b) There is no vaccination tag around the dog's neck;
198
(c) Attempt
s to peacefully capture the dog have been
199
made and proven unsuccessful
(2) Use of deadly force is permitted when a law enforcement
201
officer, who confronts a dangerous dog, reasonably fears for his
202
or her safety or the safety of others in clear proximity
to the dog.
186
section, a law enforcement officer, at any time, may enter the
187
premises where a dangerous dog is kept, or is believed to be kept,
188
for an on
-
site inspection of the premises.
189
SECTION 4.
(1) I
f a dog is determined by a law enforcement
190
officer to be a dangerous dog, then the dog may be destroyed by
191
the law enforcement officer, or his designee, provided that two
192
(2) of the following requirements are met:
193
(a) The dog is running at large or not
under proper
194
restraint when on the premises of its owner, or leashed, muzzled
195
and under the direct control of the owner when off the premises of
196
the owner, as required under this act;
197
(b) There is no vaccination tag around the dog's neck;
198
(c) Attempt
s to peacefully capture the dog have been
199
made and proven unsuccessful
(2) Use of deadly force is permitted when a law enforcement
201
officer, who confronts a dangerous dog, reasonably fears for his
202
or her safety or the safety of others in clear proximity
to the dog.