Jack Russell Terrier kills 6-week-old infant

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#1
http://www.kentucky.com/211/story/291759.html

Posted on Sun, Jan. 20, 2008
Dog's attack on baby called 'freakish accident'
By Valarie Honeycutt Spears
[email protected]

Jeff Mozer said the Jack Russell terrier that attacked and killed his sleeping 6-week-old nephew Friday was a longtime family pet he trusted around his own baby and other babies in the family.

And Justin Mozer and Layne Crim were doting parents, he said, who took safety precautions and "tried to do everything just right," Jeff Mozer said.

"This is the most freakish accident. It was a dog you would never think would harm anyone at all. And my brother was just really proud of the baby, it was his first," Jeff Mozer said.

According to Jeff Mozer, the baby Justin Mozer, named after his father, was sleeping in the middle of a king-size bed about 3:15 p.m. Friday when, without warning, the Jack Russell terrier attacked and killed him.

The Fayette County Coroner's office said Saturday that the cause of the accidental death was "traumatic asphyxia and blood loss due to dog attack."

Lexington police Lt. John Gensheimer said Saturday that at this point there was no reason to file charges. Though police were continuing to conduct interviews, Gensheimer said, there was no evidence to suggest that the death was anything but an accident. The baby was alone in the room, and there were no witnesses to the attack.

The baby's mother, whom Mozer identified as Layne Crim, was in another room when the attack occurred.

Layne Crim's husband died in January 2007, leaving her with two sons, about 1 and 3.

Jeff Mozer said his brother had stepped in to become a loving father to those boys, too.

"I'm very proud of him," Jeff Mozer said.

Mozer said he spent time with his nephew last week. "I held him and kissed him. He was beautiful."

Justin Mozer, 28, was at work at a pool company when the attack occurred, Jeff Mozer said.

The baby had a crib, Jeff Mozer said, but on Friday afternoon he was napping on the bed.

Jeff Mozer said Justin Mozer had owned the Jack Russell for six or seven years. "The dog has been around my baby and other babies in the family. There has never been any reason for alarm."

Jeff Mozer said his brother bought the family home at Seven Pines Drive, near Versailles Road and Alexandria Drive, about a year ago and was remodeling it.

The former president of The Lane neighborhood association, Pete Hagan, said that in September 2007, the association sent Justin Mozer a letter complaining about the behavior of pit bulls kept in the back yard. The letter, which Hagan e-mailed to the Herald-Leader on Saturday, said pit bulls routinely got out of the yard and frightened neighbors. But Hagan said he had no problems with the Jack Russell terrier, and he had noticed no problems with the pit bulls since November.

"We extend our condolences to the Mozers," Hagan said.

Justin Mozer kept a pit bull in the back yard for protection, Jeff Mozer said, but that had nothing to do with the attack on the baby.

The two dogs were taken by Fayette County Animal Control at the owner's request. The dogs' fate was not known last night. Officials did not return telephone calls.

Jeff Mozer said his brother and the baby's mother are inconsolable, as is the rest of the family.

"We will never be the same because of it."
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#2
Wow...

Gotta love how they just had to throw in that bit about them owning pits at the end... :rolleyes:
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#3
This story gets to me on so many levels.

First, I feel for that poor baby. I can't imagine what any child must go through when they are a helpless victim of such an attack.

Second, what in the hell are parents thinking these days? To leave a 6-week-old infant asleep in the middle of a bed in a room with a dog and no parental supervision.........it just infuriates me! Even as a 1st time mom, plain ol' common sense told me to not leave a child alone in a room with a dog!

Third, how on earth did this dog "accidentally" kill this baby? Get real people. Had this been any other breed, it would have been a vicious attack. Instead, this dog just accidentally grabbed the baby's throat and killed it.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#4
But...but...JRT's are SMALL dogs...they can't be vicious!

I agree with you 100% though...I mean, I wouldn't ever leave Virgo alone with a baby, even though I know she's the sweetest thing on earth, she's a horse. Just accidently stepping on a baby would do severe damage.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
90
#5
Once again a young life is taken because of stupid people !!! No excuse !!!
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#6
Once again a young life is taken because of stupid people !!! No excuse !!!
It makes me sooo angry! And sad! And frustrated!

I totally believe that the parents should be charged. I think the parents should always be charged in these types of incidents! Heck, if they had let the baby drown in the bathtub, they would've been charged. This is the same principle.

It just breaks my heart for those who have to pay the price of others' irresponsibility.....especially when the irresponsible walk away with not even a slap on the wrist.:(
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
10,119
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
wasilla alaska
#7
It makes me sooo angry! And sad! And frustrated!

I totally believe that the parents should be charged. I think the parents should always be charged in these types of incidents! Heck, if they had let the baby drown in the bathtub, they would've been charged. This is the same principle.

It just breaks my heart for those who have to pay the price of others' irresponsibility.....especially when the irresponsible walk away with not even a slap on the wrist.:(
I couldnt agree more.
 

adojrts

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
4,089
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Ontario, Canada
#8
Oh ****, I knew this day would come but had hoped it wouldn't.
I wouldn't leave a small child or an infant alone with any dog, let alone one that was never bred to a companion dog in the first place and especially one bred with a certain amount of aggression for hunting and yes to kill things.
Although jrts are to bay and not slay that doesn't mean they wont kill.
How foolish of those people and that poor baby.......how terrible.
 

adojrts

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
4,089
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Ontario, Canada
#9
Third, how on earth did this dog "accidentally" kill this baby? Get real people. Had this been any other breed, it would have been a vicious attack. Instead, this dog just accidentally grabbed the baby's throat and killed it.
I don't believe for one second that it was an accident. Whether the infant made a small cry or whatever, it triggered that dog to attack and yes to kill, that wouldn't have been a mistake on the dogs part. Jrts are hardwired to hunt and kill and they absolutely can respond and go to those instincts that have layed dormant for years or for its entire life.
People want a cute little lap dog and have no idea what these dogs are capable of. And if they were larger, they would be part of the breed bans.
Jrts ARE a high risk breed and this is just one of the reasons.
 

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#11
clearly the pit bull had the jack under some kind of mind control.... why else would it be mentioned in every single article??

it's really a terrible shame. that child should never have died. sigh.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#12
I don't believe for one second that it was an accident. Whether the infant made a small cry or whatever, it triggered that dog to attack and yes to kill, that wouldn't have been a mistake on the dogs part. Jrts are hardwired to hunt and kill and they absolutely can respond and go to those instincts that have layed dormant for years or for its entire life.
People want a cute little lap dog and have no idea what these dogs are capable of. And if they were larger, they would be part of the breed bans.
Jrts ARE a high risk breed and this is just one of the reasons.
I feel for you. I really like and admire JRTs. Of course, I'm a terrier person too and I completely understand their breeding and their drives. It just stinks that you will probably now endure some of the same hateful comments that I do all because of what someone else's dog has done to tarnish the reputation of our own.
 

Lilavati

Arbitrary and Capricious
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
7,644
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
47
Location
Alexandria, VA
#13
All I can think is they left a six week old baby alone with a terrier? With a terrier? You never, ever, ever leave anything smaller or weaker than the terrier is with a terrer. The kid would have been safer with the pit bulls. (not that that is at all a good idea either).

I have nothing against JRTs, or other terriers, but I have a nearly infinite respect, born of growing up with them, seeing ground trials, and having other pets in the same house, for their prey drive.

But of course, don't we all know that small cute dogs are never, ever dangerous? /Smacks forhead
 

adojrts

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
4,089
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Ontario, Canada
#14
I feel for you. I really like and admire JRTs. Of course, I'm a terrier person too and I completely understand their breeding and their drives. It just stinks that you will probably now endure some of the same hateful comments that I do all because of what someone else's dog has done to tarnish the reputation of our own.
Well we already hear the negative comments about them and from some people's experiences with some jrts, it's justified.

What drives me nuts are the ones who own them (and god for bid breed them ) and insist that their lovely little dogs wouldn't ever do something like attack an infant. It's BS. They are absolutely capable of doing something as tragic as this.
I breed for a stable temperament and I have known thousands of jrts that are awesome, but you just can't forget the hardwiring in them as so many people blindly do.
And the ones that we jrt people consider to be hard, well in some cases they are down right mental. I wont have such a dog and I certainly wouldn't breed it.
Thanks folks for understanding that there are people out there with awesome jrts, that really do understand them and take that responsiblity on head first.

There are people that have pitties or similiar breeds/types, that have them for the wrong reasons and don't understand or care. We deal with the same thing were jrts are concerned, except its at the other end of the scale....cute little dog vs aren't I tough, look at my dog.......both have the potential to be dangerous or a problem
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
#15
They are absolutely capable of doing something as tragic as this.
Each and every breed of dog and mixed breed is capable of doing this! If it's got teeth, it can and will bite given the chance and the circumstance. It's just people have their heads so far up their own butts that they refuse to see that they own dogs......not little humans with 4 legs.

All I can think is they left a six week old baby alone with a terrier? With a terrier? You never, ever, ever leave anything smaller or weaker than the terrier is with a terrer. The kid would have been safer with the pit bulls. (not that that is at all a good idea either).
I'm not sure if you were meaning to be offensive or if I just took it that way. I wouldn't leave my child along with a 15-year-old Pug if given the chance. I don't care what breed of dog or mixed breed of dog it is, YOU NEVER LEAVE CHILDREN ALONE WITH DOGS! Or even cats for that matter! Cats have suffocated infants and killed them while others have attacked them as well. People need to wake-up to reality and be responsible.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
90
#16
Glad I didn't have this forum when I had Goldens and infants !!! I trusted my dogs 100% ,,,, guess I was lucky .
 

Dekka

Just try me..
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
19,779
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
48
Location
Ontario
#17
That is so heartbreaking. In the parents slight defense, were they ever told? I meet so many people who are clueless. We all know and are taught about drowning. But there needs to be more education about dogs in general, without demonizing any breed.

Yes nothing smaller, weaker, heck even slightly larger than a terrier is really safe if it makes that 'prey sound'. I have seen my own dogs 'turn on' when one of the dogs makes a yelp, or squeek.

Oh we do get the biased opinions and the oh I hate JRTs they are viscous little dogs... And to be honest many people (a scary number really) will then point to some scar on their body..and say "my brother's JRT" or who ever's JRT bit me. I always wonder where all these biting JRTs come from, and what the owners do about it. I have had JRT owners come up to me at petshows and things like the sportsman show where the JRT club has a booth to educate about JRTs, and say ohhh my dog could never do that (and then point and Snip on the booth table just loving every human who comes past). I have even had ppl tell me they cannot touch their own JRT, for fear it will bite them.
The JRT rescue is the only rescue I know that willingly takes dogs who have bitten.

Its almost always a case like this on, but much less extreme, people who have no real knowledge of the breed, and no business owning them.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,544
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
london, Ontario
#18
That is so heartbreaking. In the parents slight defense, were they ever told? I meet so many people who are clueless. We all know and are taught about drowning. But there needs to be more education about dogs in general, without demonizing any breed.
I think its more common sense that even breed research in this case.
You don't need to be told not to leave your kid in a bathtub with water, same theory.
I wouldn't leave a baby in the middle of a bed anyway alone, I would be to
afraid he would still roll over and fall off, even with a king size bed.
The baby should have been in the crib with the door closed if she could not be there. Not just for safety, but also so any noise or pets would not wake up the baby, just common sense.
 

Zoom

Twin 2.0
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
40,739
Likes
3
Points
38
Age
41
Location
Denver, CO
#20
I think it was a Pomeranian, but same principle. Anything with teeth has the potential to bite/kill.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top