How does your breed rate? OFA info-

Discussion in 'The Breeding Ground' started by IliamnasQuest, Mar 13, 2007.

  1. IliamnasQuest

    IliamnasQuest Loves off-leash training!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Red brought up a point that I wanted to talk about. When x-rays are done, some people may opt not to send them in because of obvious abnormalities (although a "general practitioner" type of vet is not really qualified to judge hip and elbow x-rays, especially being as abnormalities vary some by breed). So the results on hips and elbows can be slightly swayed because of that.

    You will generally see many more hips listed on the site because OFA has been doing hips since 1966, but elbows only since 1990.

    Cardiac, patellas, thyroid, etc. are not valid as far as ratings per breed on the OFA site because those are not rated by OFA. Owners opt to send those in and the majority of people probably wouldn't send them in if they're not passing. I think most (if not all) of the testing other than hips and elbows is done elsewhere and then sent in separately for listing on the site. If you have a dog that passed everything, then you would probably want to list it!

    Most people who have their dogs OFA'd are serious breeders, too. There are vast numbers of dogs out there being bred/shown who never have the dogs x-rayed. If I were going to buy another dog, I'd certainly check OFA results (or other valid forms of testing). It's so easy to go on the site and do a search for a dog's name or even part of a name.

    Melanie and the gang in Alaska
     
  2. Amstaffer

    Amstaffer New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    2
    Location:
    Milwaukee WI
    Great website, thanks
     
  3. elegy

    elegy overdogged

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    7,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    they're way up there for other things, too. amstaffs are 12 and apbts 21 for elbow dysplasia. amstaffs are SEVENTH and apbts 23 for cardiac. amstaffs 21 and apbts 11 for thyroid.

    i would be very interested to see how the so called "game bred" lines test. but of course, they don't have any health issues, so they don't test *eyeroll*
     
  4. showpug

    showpug New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    3 pugs and a bulldog
    Location:
    Oregon
    Grammy, back when you were breeding Goldens, was it common practice to OFA hips on breeding stock?
     
  5. OutlineACDs

    OutlineACDs Crazy Dog!

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I don't find that to be true. There are a hell of a lot of dogs out there who have a lot of heart and therefore never physically show the pain of HD or other problems. These 'working' breeders who don't test are doing just as much of an injustice to the breed as their showdog counterparts. Dogs can work through pain, especially when it is in their genes and they live for it.
     
  6. RD

    RD Are you dead yet?

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    15,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    2 dogs
    Location:
    Ohio
    I agree that dogs can work through pain, but I've never heard of a dog that works (and by works I mean actually working a livestock establishment on a regular basis, not hobby herding with dog-broke sheep in a paddock) well and gets around well at home while having some underlying, crippling problem like hip dysplasia. Even an intense, stoic Border Collie will show the effects of the condition, whether it is while working or at night after the dog is off the stock.

    If a dog can do that job and not show any signs EVER (not just on stock, becuase I can understand a dog working through a considerable amount of pain) that it has a problem, then it is a sufficiently sound working dog IMHO. I would prefer that everyone test their dogs too, but this breed did just dandy for hundreds of years before OFA existed, and I don't think that people who don't OFA their real working dogs are harming the breed at all.
     
  7. ToscasMom

    ToscasMom Harumph™©®

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    6,211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    4 Cats and 1 Collie With a Hairball
    Location:
    Mother Ship
    Home Page:
    Collies: 2.3% hip dysplastic
    0.0% Elbow dysplastic
    4.0% idiopathic thyroid
    0.0% autoimmune thyroid

    No cardiac or pettular stats
     
  8. Bahamutt99

    Bahamutt99 Dafuq?

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    2 dogs
    Location:
    High Ridge, MO
    Home Page:
    RD, I know of two dogs who -- while they may not be stock dogs -- put in their hard weekend's work. Both have genetic health problems that you'd never know about if nobody told you. They're both good weight pull dogs, and at least one of the two runs agility as well. Both are the kind of dogs that will go all day if its something they want. Both had their problems identified through health-testing and are out of the gene pool.

    I've said it before and many times. I've even blogged it. Health testing is a tool. It can only help in a breeding program, not hurt. (Unless one is afraid of what they're going to find.)
     
  9. SisMorphine

    SisMorphine Your Mom

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Greyhounds: 138 for HD with 2.3% being abnormal. Truth is, I have yet to meet a retired racer with HD. It is more common in the AKC-bred Greyhounds, but obviously not even THAT common.

    Alapahas: No ranking, only 6 dogs tested and hips were 50/50. The thing is, with Alapahas there is no true standard since they are still considered a breed in development, and from what I've seen there are two very different lines of Alapaha, one looking more like an AB (Athena's type) and one looking more like an EB. So which types were tested? Which breeders, which lines? I definitely wish it told you more.

    Akita/pit bull: well Mike's screwed. LOL! the Akita part of him is ranked 67 and the APBT part of him (assuming that that is what makes up his "pit bull" portion) is ranked 26. Lately I've been thinking his back end looks a little stiff, but I may just be imagining things since I'm a hypochondriac. LOL!
     
  10. Renee750il

    Renee750il Felurian

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    94,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Occupation:
    3, Bimmer, GSDX (m); Kharma, Fila Brasileiro (f);
    Location:
    Where the selas blooms
    Home Page:
    That's what I was thinking of when I mentioned working lines ;) If you're attuned to your dogs and watching them on a daily basis, you're going to see things - even intuit things - subtleties that might not even show up on tests.
     
  11. bubbatd

    bubbatd Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    64,812
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Showpug ... OFA didn't start until about mid sixties . And yes , after that all good breeders had their studs or bitches checked . Elbows came in much later .
     
  12. AusCatDogs_4Ever

    AusCatDogs_4Ever but please call me Aus.

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    1 ACD, 2 Moggie Cats, 1 Betta CT
    Location:
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Home Page:
  13. sjames

    sjames New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    I have 3 pets. Wish the 'rents would let me have m
    Location:
    Capital of Canada : Ottawa
    Miniature schnauzers are not ranked in any of them. I'm guessing that that is a good thing.
     
  14. Lynx

    Lynx Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Occupation:
    Just two.
    Location:
    Oregon
    TIBETAN MASTIFF
    Registry Rank Evaluations Percent Abnormal Percent Normal
    CARDIAC N/A 1 0.0 100.0
    ELBOW 29 211 10.4 89.1
    HIPS 69 658 12.9 85.4
    THYROID N/A 37 21.6 70.3

    Two N/A's. :( I expected the hips.. tibet's are quite large.. elbow not too bad.
     
  15. SummerRiot

    SummerRiot Dog Show Addict

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    8,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    we have three puppies in the house.. and some fish
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    BELGIAN TERVUREN
    Registry.................... Rank .Evaluations Percent Abnormal Percent Normal
    BAER HEARING TEST.... N/A ...2 .............0.0 ...................100.0
    CARDIAC.................... 49 ....145 ..........0.0 ...................100.0
    ELBOW....................... 51 ....2081 ........4.1 ...................95.6
    HIPS .........................133 ....4695 ........3.6 ...................96.0
    PATELLA..................... N/A ...29 ...........0.0 ..................100.0
    THYROID...................... 53 ...383 ..........2.1 ...................82.2
     
  16. Bahamutt99

    Bahamutt99 Dafuq?

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,365
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    2 dogs
    Location:
    High Ridge, MO
    Home Page:
    That is very interesting. I wonder where the other 48% is on those PRA evaluations. I've seen some OFA numbers be a bit off, but that's quite a discrepancy.
     
  17. OutlineACDs

    OutlineACDs Crazy Dog!

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas

    I get my dogs' eyes CERF'd every other year. We have a genetic test for late onset PRA. You can know if your dog is not carrier, a carrier, or affected. My older bitch is a "B" meaning, shes a carrier, not affected. Her daughter from my litter has not yet been tested, but she is either an "A" or "b" because of what her parents are. If you do an "a" to "a" breeding there is almost no need to do the genetic test on the puppies because they are all obligate "A's". So I think some people have slacked off on the CERF'ing, or else these could be the results of our genetic test. As in the 48% are the "B's" carrier's but not affected.
     

Share This Page