Flea/Tick Meds?

Discussion in 'Dog Health Care' started by Julee, Feb 3, 2013.

  1. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    As you can see in this thread, I know nothing about chemical reactions and what may cause things to lose effectiveness... so I just ask. Haha. XD
     
  2. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    My point was simply that even "natural" products ARE chemicals. So it always amuses me to see someone spurn "chemical" flea and tick products and then use something "natural."
     
  3. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    It's all a matter of science. The sentiment is the same, regardless. Mad-made products are full of extremely harmful chemicals for dogs. Natural products are not full of harmful chemicals, so it's easy to say that they aren't "chemical products."
     
  4. Raegan

    Raegan Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Giant Miniature Schnauzer & International Toller o
    Location:
    Fond du Lac, WI
    So... since chocolate is natural, it isn't full of chemicals that are harmful for dogs?
     
  5. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    I'm not sure why it's necessary to get into specifics about chemicals? EVERYONE here knew exactly what I -and others- meant. :confused:
     
  6. DenoLo

    DenoLo New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    MA
    Really doesn't work that way. If I'm not mistaken there IS a chemical in garlic and onions that can be harmful to dogs. Not quite as simple as man-made=bad and natural=good.
     
  7. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    I'm talking about dog products, though. Not everything in general. Which is why chocolate has no part in the conversation?

    When garlic is dried the way the Bug Off Garlic is made, it doesn't effect dogs apparently.
     
  8. Raegan

    Raegan Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Giant Miniature Schnauzer & International Toller o
    Location:
    Fond du Lac, WI
    Two reasons.

    1) chemical is a word with a meaning. You are using it incorrectly. If you learn to use it correctly, you will be better understood in the future.

    2) appeal to nature is a logical fallacy. Just because something is natural does not mean it is more effective or less dangerous than something manmade. And the distinction is not as black and white as you are implying.
     
  9. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    I will probably continue using it incorrectly regardless. ;) Because, no one I know in real life cares about the real meaning, and that is what gets the point across. I'm understood just fine by anyone that isn't a science major, apparently. :p Numerous people in this thread, included...

    So natural dog products (specifically medications, since that is what we are talking about here) are not less dangerous than man-made dog products?
     
  10. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    The reason why I think it's necessary to get into specifics is that the beliefs that "natural" products are 1. chemical-free and 2. inherently safer than man-made products are incorrect and misleading. It's just fear mongering that interferes with thoughtful risk assessment about what to use (I'm speaking generally here, not just flea/tick control).
     
  11. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    It's not that I didn't understand your point. It's that I think your point is faulty and based on an incorrect understanding of how "natural" products work and what their risks are.
     
  12. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    I AM interested to know in which cases natural products aren't safer than man-made products, when talking about consumption for humans or dogs? I mean... Organic food is safer than GMOs... natural remedies are safer than flu vaccines... I could go on and on. I feel that there may be a few exceptions to the rule, but generally, natural products are safer for the body than the man-made counterparts.
     
  13. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Well nobody knows if garlic is safer, because the chemical compound hasn't been identified and nobody's done any safety testing other than "a lot of dogs have used it safely." By that standard, ALL the man-made products on the market are just as safe because a lot of dogs have used THEM safely, so why the preference for garlic if that's your standard?

    The assumption made about natural products is that they are inherently safe. It's a misleading and potentially dangerous fallacy, and not how I like to make decisions.
     
  14. DJEtzel

    DJEtzel New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kalamazoo, MI
    So the anecdotal evidence with no reports of dogs being injured in any way from Bug Off Garlic, while MANY cases have been reported of injuries/side effects of products like Bio Spot, doesn't let you assume that one product is safer? What more research is there, if there are no controlled experiments to read by scientists?

    The same could be asked of lemon/honey/vit c vs. flu vaccines...
     
  15. DenoLo

    DenoLo New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    MA
    Exactly. Their big study that they cite on their page is one where they force-fed 1/2 pound a day for 7 days, and only found a little bit of damage. So in other words...it's dose dependent. And I'm sure that used at proper dosages it's probably extremely safe. But...typically so are "man-made" products.
     
  16. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Also, my whole original point is that it is ignorant to say something like "I don't like to use chemicals so I use garlic" without the basic understanding that whatever it is in garlic that (maybe) works IS a chemical, nobody knows what it is or how it works, and nobody knows how safe it is.
     
  17. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    There's a saying among toxicologists that is something like "the dose makes the poison." Meaning... it isn't a substance that is dangerous or toxic, it is the dose you are exposed to. Some things take very minute amounts to be harmful and others take a huge amount. Heck, even water is toxic if you drink enough. What you really want, of course, is something that does what you want it to do at a much lower dose than a harmful or toxic dose.

    But to assume and proclaim something is "safe" and inherently better because it "isn't a chemical" (which it is - or, stated more correctly, which it contains) and it is "natural" (which doesn't make it safe) when nobody really knows anything about it isn't a good basis for a decision IMO.
     
  18. Lyzelle

    Lyzelle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Colorado
    I've yet to see or hear of a dog drop dead from the wiff of an onion, clove of garlic, or vinegar.

    The chemicals in many popular flea and tick medications and products, however...well, they have quite a different track record. Many of the synthetic chemicals used actually work because they interfere with the insects' nervous system. Either by blocking chlorine and therefore causing paralysis or by simply blocking nerve transmission completely. And given how many neurological symptoms have been documented and warned against while using these products...hm. I'll personally steer clear, and that is a decision I'm quite happy with.

    There is nothing inherently dangerous about onions, garlic, or vinegar. If there were, I would think we would certainly know and plenty of dogs would be dead by now, given how many food companies put onions or garlic in their formulas.
     
  19. sassafras

    sassafras mushinois

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Well, first of all all topical man-made flea/tick control products are not the same. It's interesting that you use Bio Spot as an example because it traditionally has contained pyrethrins as its active ingredients - which ironically are completely natural, plant derived (from Chysanthemums), and relatively toxic (especially to cats) compounds compared to the active ingredients in something like Frontline or Advantage which are 100% man-made and quite a bit safer. I think very recently Bio Spot has switched to pyrethroids which are pyrethrin-like but man-made.

    Anyway, I have thousands of anecdotal reports of dogs using Frontline with no injury/side effects whatsoever.
     
  20. JessLough

    JessLough Love My Mutt

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    13,402
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Kennel Manager
    Location:
    Guelph, Ontario
    We don't use anything, because I'm not a fan of putting (what i find) unnecessary chemicals, natural or not, on or in my dog.

    16 years later, with daily hikes in the woods and daily swimming in the summer and we've never had an issue, either. Well, we've had ticks in the house, but it was the foster ferret that was found as a stray :p
     

Share This Page