Denver to expand breed ban?

Discussion in 'Dog News and Articles' started by adoptashelterpettoday, Jul 2, 2007.

  1. adoptashelterpettoday

    adoptashelterpettoday New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.newszap.com/articles/2007/06/30/dm/central_delaware/dsn04.txt

    Dover ponders stricter pet control measures

    By Kate House-Layton, Delaware State News
    DOVER — Dover could take a harder stance on pet owners with a proposed expansion of the city’s animal control laws.

    Dover City Council’s Parks and Recreation Committee is reviewing possible changes to the law that could require not just dog, but cat registration, restrict the number of animals a person can keep, expand the list of dangerous dog breeds and increase fines for violators.

    “It’s a question of trying to get the owners to accept responsibility for the animals,” councilman and committee member Eugene B. Ruane said. “It should almost be called ‘animal owners responsibility law.’”

    Councilwoman and committee chairwoman Sophia R. Russell said the group started looking into the law expansion in April, but Councilman Ruane said the idea took shape last year, when numerous dog attacks and bites were reported and more than 100 cats were found living in the home of Pamela and Candice Haas.

    A look at the city’s animal control laws showed a need for expansion.

    “There were a lot of holes in it, a lot of gaps,” Councilman Ruane said.

    Comparing Dover’s animal control laws with those of Milford, Newark, Wilmington and even cities in Virginia, the committee is trying to come up with laws that suit everyone.

    The group also has met with the Kent County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for advice on broadening the law and possibly teaming with the organization, which already holds the state contract for dog control. It provides backup for the Dover Police Department’s animal control officer and a place to keep animals.

    “We’ve only had just one brief meeting with them,” said SPCA executive director Murrey Goldthwaite. “They asked us to put together a few things of what our version would be. That’s as far as it’s gone with us. We definitely would like to help them.”

    The committee, Mr. Goldthwaite said, asked about registration and about the SPCA’s microchip program, which implants a small computer chip under an animal’s skin that can be scanned to identify the animal and its owner if the animal is lost, stolen or picked up by an animal control officer.

    The committee, he said, also asked the SPCA about animal control man-hours and policies.

    “You don’t need a regulation that looks good on the books but does not work for the community,” Mr. Goldthwaite said.

    Among other changes, the law could limit Dover homes to four animals except for animal litters, which could be kept up to five months as long as the mother is on the premises. Fish and some other animals would be exempt from that part of the law.

    The city also could expand the list of dangerous dogs to include Akitas, Rottweilers, chow chows, Doberman pinschers, mastiffs and any mix of breeds on the list.

    Kent County SPCA has maintained that list for more than 10 years.

    Anyone convicted of a drug offense could be prohibited from owning any dangerous breed of dog.

    Dog and cat owners also would have to keep their pets‘ vaccinations up to date.

    Seeing Eye dogs and police dogs could be exempt from the law.

    Any person convicted of violating the law could be subject to a $250 to $750 fine, depending on the number of convictions.

    There also could be stiffer fines, ranging from $50 to $150, for animals caught running at large.

    Talks on the expanded law could continue this August, Councilwoman Russell said.
     
  2. Well it is bad either way you look at it, but this is in reference to Dover DELAWARE, not Denver, CO.
     
  3. noludoru

    noludoru Bored Now.

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    17,830
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    1 Dog
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Home Page:
    Overall.. Ughhhhhhh.

    WTF?

    Right, not going to rant. Just,

    UGH!
     
  4. Zoom

    Zoom Twin 2.0

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    40,739
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    That scared me for a moment about Denver...not that having it in Dover is any better, but yeah.

    Still....eish.
     
  5. Amstaffer

    Amstaffer New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    2
    Location:
    Milwaukee WI
    Big Edit....Ooops

    Anyway....I think it is crazy but yet predictable. These fascist won't stop until anything bigger that a cat will be banned.
     
  6. Sweet72947

    Sweet72947 Squishy face

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    9,158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    1 Dog, Norris!
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Home Page:
    But wait! Cat scratches and bites can become horrible infected and really hurt people! Lets ban cats too! :rolleyes:
     
  7. Picklepaige

    Picklepaige Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Mississippi
    Ugh, people are stupid.
     
  8. Sweet72947

    Sweet72947 Squishy face

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    9,158
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    1 Dog, Norris!
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Home Page:
    By the way, if anyone is interested, if you go to www.pitbullband.com There is a link to the lawsuit document (Denver is being sued because of BSL). It is very interesting. I wonder if the suit against Denver will pan out.
     
  9. Not surprising!:(
     
  10. adoptashelterpettoday

    adoptashelterpettoday New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry you all!! It wont let me edit it either.

    It is ridiculous no matter what!

    I know North LIttle Rock (which already bans pit bulls & Am Bulldogs) is also looking to expand it's breed ban. I cant find the article now. I will have to find it...
     
  11. Doberluv

    Doberluv Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    22,034
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    2 dogs
    Location:
    western Wa
    Oh wow, that's a relief...fish will be exempt. So, that means someone can have more than 4 tropical fish in their aquarium. Woo hoo. These commies make me sick. This country is going to Hell.
     
  12. divagirl

    divagirl New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    3
    Location:
    las vegas, nv
    ^ I agree.....are we going to Nazism or what???? I'm disgusted!!
     

Share This Page