Who is "they" exactly?
And how does calling them "American Pit Bull Terriers" instead of "Pit Bulls" keep them from being rounded up as "pit bulls"?? I could see if it was AmStaffs being labeled as pit bulls and the AmStaff fanciers being in an uproar about their breed name, but when "pit bulls" are being targeted and "pit bull" is in fact half the breed name, how does adding two more words there not make them "pit bulls"?? I just am not getting the logic.
^^^This, exactly.
I don't know anyone who would call a bulldog a pit bull, unless that person truely didn't recognize the difference between a bulldog and an APBT. Same with bull terriers, american bullies, etc.
An APBT owner once told me that APBTs and AmStaffs are the same breed. I didn't know any better, so I looked it up, and came back to her and told her the differences. She said it didn't matter, they were so close they "might as well" be the same.
I was with a friend and her papillon once, and a stranger came up and commented on her "long-haired chihuahua." She corrected him, told him it was a papillon, and he said "Same thing."
So yeah, I don't believe that it's only pit bulls that get confused for other breeds, or get wrongly lumped with other breeds.
One thing that I do see a lot is lumping APBTs, amstaffs, bull terriers, bulldogs, rotties, and mixes of them and a few other breeds together and calling them "bully breeds." I don't see anything wrong with this either, just like you lump small breeds and call them "lap dogs," there's also hounds, herders, retrievers, etc.