Breeds FOR beginners.

mrose_s

BusterLove
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
12,169
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
QLD, Australia
#1
Inspired by Maxy's thread, what breed would you conside best for beginners?

I'd have to put Goldens and Labs up there because they seem so laid back, but they're not the sort of dog for me.

One of the other breeds I'd put right up there would be staffy's
 

SummerRiot

Dog Show Addict
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
8,056
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
40
Location
Ontario, Canada
#3
I agree with Jess..

Goldens and Labs really aren't for beginners either - They require a lot of consistant training otherwise you see those overly hyper dogs that DONT listen to their owners..
 

Boemy

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
2,481
Likes
0
Points
0
#5
I would say goldens and labs AS LONG AS the newbie owner exercises a lot. They are not really the "ideal family dog" any more because, well, most Americans are overweight and don't exercise enough. Probably back when the kids were running around with the dog all the time instead of planted in front of the TV they were the ideal family dogs. They definitely need training or they'll become a terror, but they are very receptive to training. :)
 

Brattina88

Active Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
12,958
Likes
6
Points
38
Location
OH
#6
Boemy - I very much agree! It still surprises me to learn how many people don't even walk their dogs like every other day! And then they wonder why the dog jumps, digs, is destructive, etc

As long as one goes with a good breeder, or an adult rescue, and they do research and enlist the help of a friend knowledgeable in dogs, or even a trainer I think a Cocker can be good for first time dog owner as long as they don't mind paying for a professional groomer. JMO
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#7
I think it all depends on the family. I think a lot of hounds can be good for first timers; as long as they aren't expecting a super obedient, off-leash companion, most of the ones I know are pretty forgiving types. Some of the spaniels and retrievers, as long as they are active people able to provide sufficient exercise.

I'd pull staffys off the list, because along with the high energy, you are most likely going to have dog aggression and prey drive; not something I would ever want for a beginning dog owner. They should be able to take the time to learn about training and make a few mistakes without having to worry about aggression issues.

Mostly, I agree with Jess. An adult rescue with a solid temperment.
 

Buddy'sParents

*Finding My Inner Fila*
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
25,377
Likes
0
Points
36
#8
Labs are high energy dogs, I wouldn't disqualify them as being "right" for beginners, but I certainly wouldn't say it's the best fit. I have no knowledge of goldens firsthand, but my experience from the outside looking in, tells me that they can be a lot of dog to handle as well. Different strokes for different folks, though. It certainly depends on the individual and the family as to what would be a good first-time dog.

With that said, I echo Jess. Finding a responsible, well-known shelter and adopting a dog is a great idea for a first time dog owner. You don't have the puppy stages. :D
 

Rosefern

New Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
669
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Midwest
#9
I'd say a Std. Poodle would be great for a total beginner. They're trainable, fairly calm, they don't need a huge amount of exercise. Only downside is the high grooming requirements.

-Rosefern
 

RD

Are you dead yet?
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
15,572
Likes
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ohio
#10
ALL dogs have drive, energy, dominant/aggressive tendencies or whatever it is about them that people say is not for beginners. Goldens have it, Labs have it... I see these two breeds continually pushed as the ideal dog for beginners, but they're not a walk in the park! There's no "easy breed" to own, just easy individuals. If someone really wants a dog that's so laid back and non-confrontational, I think they should go to a shelter or rescue and pick out an individual that suits their needs.

My family's first dog was a Lab. My first dog was a Chow mix. Both were terrific dogs.
 

bubbatd

Moderator
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
64,812
Likes
1
Points
0
Age
91
#11
I'd suggest a rescued dog for a newbie . After you get the hang of dog ownership , you could go puppy . Yes, Labs can be more energetic than Goldens . Depends on the breeding and early socialization though .
 

Melissa_W

New Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
4,290
Likes
0
Points
0
#12
I think that any breed can be a good first breed if you do your research and make sure that you know what you are getting yourself into.
 
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
269
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
MA
#13
I think it all depends on the family. I think a lot of hounds can be good for first timers; as long as they aren't expecting a super obedient, off-leash companion, most of the ones I know are pretty forgiving types. Some of the spaniels and retrievers, as long as they are active people able to provide sufficient exercise.

I'd pull staffys off the list, because along with the high energy, you are most likely going to have dog aggression and prey drive; not something I would ever want for a beginning dog owner. They should be able to take the time to learn about training and make a few mistakes without having to worry about aggression issues.

Mostly, I agree with Jess. An adult rescue with a solid temperment.
I agree, it all depends on the family and its willingness to train, play, and love their dog. if they are a layed back family get a layed back dog.
 

Baxter'smybaby

swimming upstream
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
21,977
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
NY
#14
Labs are high energy dogs, I wouldn't disqualify them as being "right" for beginners, but I certainly wouldn't say it's the best fit. I have no knowledge of goldens firsthand, but my experience from the outside looking in, tells me that they can be a lot of dog to handle as well. Different strokes for different folks, though. It certainly depends on the individual and the family as to what would be a good first-time dog.

With that said, I echo Jess. Finding a responsible, well-known shelter and adopting a dog is a great idea for a first time dog owner. You don't have the puppy stages. :D




I absolutely agree--there really is NO best beginner dog--because everyone looks at traits differently!! Having raised a lab from puppyhood--I can say that if you are not commited to training and exercise, and at least 2-3 years of intense puppy behavior--labs are not a good fit! they are great with people, and want to please--but need lots of attention!
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#15
Boston bull terriers FTW!

Ahem...er.. Actually, I think that a "casual" first time dog owner is best off with an adult dog of whatever breed happens to fit their lifestyle best.
 

Labra

New Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Messages
280
Likes
0
Points
0
#16
I think most breeds can make good first time dogs providing the owner researches through and through. There is no right or wrong. I know two separate families with 'first time' dogs - one of them is an Akita, the other is a Rottweiler. Both families did their research, knew fully what they were getting themselves into and in turn, the dogs have worked out wonderfully for them.

Many recommend Labs and Goldens as first dogs. They are excellent first dogs providing that crucial research is done. The reason so many Labs end up in shelters is because new owners do not research. Labs have amazing temperaments but they are high energy, intelligent and demanding. They are not the type of dog who is content with backyard play and a walk around the block. They are not used as gundogs, police dogs, search and rescue dogs and guide dogs because they are lazy and unintelligent!
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
2,434
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Oregon
#17
I tend to say Goldens or Labs. I also like the Spaniels (Springers, mainly) or the Brittany for that job. They are higher energy than some dogs, but depending on the breeding and individual it can be mild to insane. Adults are especially suitable though.

Given the huge number of Retrievers and to a lesser extent the Spaniels, they have pretty solid temperaments for the genetic abuse they take at puppy mills and bybs. Most of the problems I've seen can be traced back to a lack of exercise rather than poor temperaments, which is really amazing to me.

They are generally quick to learn. The incidence of dog aggression, people aggression and other problems seems relatively low, which is also important. I think that makes up for most of energy problems, if the family is willing to get off the couch at all. Most are satisfied by a long game of fetch or swimming, something the owner can do from a lawn chair. ;)

Contrast that to the Sighthounds which need a vast, fenced area, or the senthounds/pointers/Dalmatians that can run for miles, it makes the retrievers exercise requirements look tiny in some respects.
 

Paige

Let it be
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
7,359
Likes
0
Points
0
#18
A mutt. Well any dog really that is already mature so that the owner knows what they are getting themselves into.
 

Romy

Taxiderpy
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
10,233
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Olympia, WA
#19
Contrast that to the Sighthounds which need a vast, fenced area, or the senthounds/pointers/Dalmatians that can run for miles, it makes the retrievers exercise requirements look tiny in some respects.
I have to strongly disagree with this. We have fostered several sighthounds and they are EXTREMELY laid back. The staghound we are fostering is about 11 months old, and he is a total slug, which is typical for this group of dogs. Sighthounds in general are slugs that need access to a fenced area where they can do their twice daily 5 minute "tear around at 45 mph" thing, before coming back inside to sleep on the couch. There is no way you could expect a spaniel or a retriever to be remotely like that.

Actually, the big challenge with sighthound puppies is getting them to be active enough that they don't look like buttless angelfish when grown. Usually this means having two the same age so they can exercise one another when the urge to play hits, and then pass out on the couch 10 minutes later.

Retriever exercise needs are WAY more intense than any sighthound. I have spent the past 2 and a half months fostering sighthounds, and been pregnant on bedrest at the same time. There is no way on this planet that I could have fostered a retriever or spaniel with their exercise requirements. No freaking way.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
2,434
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Oregon
#20
I'm, not saying that the Sighthounds need a ton of exercise, the problem is having the fenced area to get them to run, and keep them in (the Saluki high jumping comes to mind...).

The average backyard is not big enough for one to really get up to speed and stay at it. The ease of that 5minute run gets less easy when you need to drive 15 minutes to a dog park, worry about other dogs with that thin skin, drive home, etc. The happiest sighthound I've seen was a Greyhound let loose in a baseball field, but that means dodging the town police, animal control, and people generally wanting to mess with you.

We have a large fenced yard for the area, but our dogs run out of room relatively quickly when they get going. It takes Lexi (beagle/greyhound) about 3 seconds to cross the yard, fewer than 10 strides. I would want a bigger fenced area before taking in anything faster.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top