siemens716 said:
Not sure where i stand on the pit bull issue, but it seems like that is the only breed in the news for the last few years (other than pressa canarios). conicindence or just the media picking on a breed it knows well?
Siemens, I've seen stories about 'Pit Bulls' that showed a photo of the dog and the dog was far from being a Pit. If it bites, it's called a Pit. I hope it's ignorance on the part of the parties publishing the stories or furnishing the information, and not a purposeful misinformation aimed at sensationalism.
Like the Presa Canario story in San Francisco: those dogs were cross bred with Presas and raised and trained to be vicious, but did the press continue reporting those facts once the story had taken hold? No! Suddenly the dogs became pure Presa Canarios - it made it sound like it was a problem that could be solved by getting rid of a certain breed of dog - instead of what it truly is, a problem that was caused by a certain "breed" of human.
Stories don't get aired or read anymore unless they carry some emotional punch - and we've been conditioned to cringe at the thought of a Pit, or a German Shepherd (they are used to catch bad guys, so they must be dangerous, right?
), or a Rottweiler or something that sounds big and exotic - and dangerous, so those stories get lots of attention.
When was the last time you heard a series of unrelated stories about people dying in hospitals because they've contracted a deadly staph infection while being treated? It happens, more than you'd like to think, but you aren't going to hear about it. How many times does a domestic violence story that results in a death get hashed out for days or weeks on the national media? It happens somewhere virtually everyday, but it's not a real life "Cujo" story.
It's all a matter of manipulating the public . . .