Are there no provisions for signature limiations?
- Thread starter makenzie71
- Start date
I don't get that and it's fine the sizes on here. I didn't need to scroll over for any of the ones I've seen. On some other lists I'm on there are guidelines about signature sizes. Not sure about this one though. I pretty much just lern about things as they come up. But this hasn't been an issue and I'm fine with the signature sizes I've seen. Everyone has an oppinion, though and it seems like a lot are different.
i dont see why - some of us like seeing them, but i dont like seeing the HUGE ones repeatedly.
i dont think its unreasonable to ask people not to have signatures that take up an entire screen. every other board i am on has limits as to signature size so that members don't have to scroll through more signature than there is posts -- why should this one be different?
yes there is another thread - but no real resolution came from it.
so mods, is there a reason there isnt a limit? they HAVE in the past told people that they were too large, but many people have still gotten larger ones.
i dont think its unreasonable to ask people not to have signatures that take up an entire screen. every other board i am on has limits as to signature size so that members don't have to scroll through more signature than there is posts -- why should this one be different?
yes there is another thread - but no real resolution came from it.
so mods, is there a reason there isnt a limit? they HAVE in the past told people that they were too large, but many people have still gotten larger ones.
I agree that the huge signatures, to me are irritating at best. I like to see the signatures, so I prefer not to turn them off totally, but the ones that are so big they take up half the page, or you have to scroll over to even read posts, that is over the top. And it takes me a good while to load a page if it is full of the big signatures.
I think it is only fair to have a descent size limit to the signatures.
I think it is only fair to have a descent size limit to the signatures.
I think signatures are a great thing, they help a person stand out as an individual in the community and I do enjoy looking at them, but when they are so huge that scrolling through a thread just to get to the next post becomes a chore, it's nothing less than annoying, especially if it is a conversation with several people posting relatively short messages.
It's nothing but irritating when someone posts a one-line response that barely fills the default size of a post and then a signature 3 or 4 times of that size follows.
IMO a limit on heigth of about 150 pixels would be appropriate and wouldn't restrict anyone's creativity. People who just want to show off can make a website.
It's nothing but irritating when someone posts a one-line response that barely fills the default size of a post and then a signature 3 or 4 times of that size follows.
IMO a limit on heigth of about 150 pixels would be appropriate and wouldn't restrict anyone's creativity. People who just want to show off can make a website.