Flea/Tick Meds?

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#21
Vinegar is vinegar. As long as it doesn't come into contact with anything that would alter it (like baking soda), it shouldn't lose it's efficiency at all. I use regular white vinegar, but apple cider like Fran uses is actually way better and doesn't dry the coat out as much.

Plus it smells a little nicer. :p
As you can see in this thread, I know nothing about chemical reactions and what may cause things to lose effectiveness... so I just ask. Haha. XD
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#22
My point was simply that even "natural" products ARE chemicals. So it always amuses me to see someone spurn "chemical" flea and tick products and then use something "natural."
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#23
It's all a matter of science. The sentiment is the same, regardless. Mad-made products are full of extremely harmful chemicals for dogs. Natural products are not full of harmful chemicals, so it's easy to say that they aren't "chemical products."
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#25
I'm not sure why it's necessary to get into specifics about chemicals? EVERYONE here knew exactly what I -and others- meant. :confused:
 

DenoLo

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
401
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
MA
#26
Mad-made products are full of extremely harmful chemicals for dogs. Natural products are not full of harmful chemicals,
Really doesn't work that way. If I'm not mistaken there IS a chemical in garlic and onions that can be harmful to dogs. Not quite as simple as man-made=bad and natural=good.
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#27
Really doesn't work that way. If I'm not mistaken there IS a chemical in garlic and onions that can be harmful to dogs. Not quite as simple as man-made=bad and natural=good.
I'm talking about dog products, though. Not everything in general. Which is why chocolate has no part in the conversation?

When garlic is dried the way the Bug Off Garlic is made, it doesn't effect dogs apparently.
 
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
493
Likes
0
Points
16
Location
Fond du Lac, WI
#28
I'm not sure why it's necessary to get into specifics about chemicals? EVERYONE here knew exactly what I -and others- meant. :confused:
Two reasons.

1) chemical is a word with a meaning. You are using it incorrectly. If you learn to use it correctly, you will be better understood in the future.

2) appeal to nature is a logical fallacy. Just because something is natural does not mean it is more effective or less dangerous than something manmade. And the distinction is not as black and white as you are implying.
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#29
Two reasons.

1) chemical is a word with a meaning. You are using it incorrectly. If you learn to use it correctly, you will be better understood in the future.

2) appeal to nature is a logical fallacy. Just because something is natural does not mean it is more effective or less dangerous than something manmade. And the distinction is not as black and white as you are implying.
I will probably continue using it incorrectly regardless. ;) Because, no one I know in real life cares about the real meaning, and that is what gets the point across. I'm understood just fine by anyone that isn't a science major, apparently. :p Numerous people in this thread, included...

So natural dog products (specifically medications, since that is what we are talking about here) are not less dangerous than man-made dog products?
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#30
I'm not sure why it's necessary to get into specifics about chemicals? EVERYONE here knew exactly what I -and others- meant. :confused:
The reason why I think it's necessary to get into specifics is that the beliefs that "natural" products are 1. chemical-free and 2. inherently safer than man-made products are incorrect and misleading. It's just fear mongering that interferes with thoughtful risk assessment about what to use (I'm speaking generally here, not just flea/tick control).
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#31
I will probably continue using it incorrectly regardless. ;) Because, no one I know in real life cares about the real meaning, and that is what gets the point across. I'm understood just fine by anyone that isn't a science major, apparently. :p Numerous people in this thread, included...
It's not that I didn't understand your point. It's that I think your point is faulty and based on an incorrect understanding of how "natural" products work and what their risks are.
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#32
The reason why I think it's necessary to get into specifics is that the beliefs that "natural" products are 1. chemical-free and 2. inherently safer than man-made products are incorrect and misleading. It's just fear mongering that interferes with thoughtful risk assessment about what to use (I'm speaking generally here, not just flea/tick control).
I AM interested to know in which cases natural products aren't safer than man-made products, when talking about consumption for humans or dogs? I mean... Organic food is safer than GMOs... natural remedies are safer than flu vaccines... I could go on and on. I feel that there may be a few exceptions to the rule, but generally, natural products are safer for the body than the man-made counterparts.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#33
I AM interested to know in which cases natural products aren't safer than man-made products, when talking about consumption for humans or dogs? I mean... Organic food is safer than GMOs... natural remedies are safer than flu vaccines... I could go on and on. I feel that there may be a few exceptions to the rule, but generally, natural products are safer for the body than the man-made counterparts.
Well nobody knows if garlic is safer, because the chemical compound hasn't been identified and nobody's done any safety testing other than "a lot of dogs have used it safely." By that standard, ALL the man-made products on the market are just as safe because a lot of dogs have used THEM safely, so why the preference for garlic if that's your standard?

The assumption made about natural products is that they are inherently safe. It's a misleading and potentially dangerous fallacy, and not how I like to make decisions.
 

DJEtzel

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
3,267
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
#34
So the anecdotal evidence with no reports of dogs being injured in any way from Bug Off Garlic, while MANY cases have been reported of injuries/side effects of products like Bio Spot, doesn't let you assume that one product is safer? What more research is there, if there are no controlled experiments to read by scientists?

The same could be asked of lemon/honey/vit c vs. flu vaccines...
 

DenoLo

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
401
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
MA
#35
Well nobody knows if garlic is safer, because the chemical compound hasn't been identified and nobody's done any safety testing other than "a lot of dogs have used it safely." By that standard, ALL the man-made products on the market are just as safe because a lot of dogs have used THEM safely, so why the preference for garlic if that's your standard?

The assumption made about natural products is that they are inherently safe. It's a misleading and potentially dangerous fallacy, and not how I like to make decisions.
Exactly. Their big study that they cite on their page is one where they force-fed 1/2 pound a day for 7 days, and only found a little bit of damage. So in other words...it's dose dependent. And I'm sure that used at proper dosages it's probably extremely safe. But...typically so are "man-made" products.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#36
Also, my whole original point is that it is ignorant to say something like "I don't like to use chemicals so I use garlic" without the basic understanding that whatever it is in garlic that (maybe) works IS a chemical, nobody knows what it is or how it works, and nobody knows how safe it is.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#37
Exactly. Their big study that they cite on their page is one where they force-fed 1/2 pound a day for 7 days, and only found a little bit of damage. So in other words...it's dose dependent. And I'm sure that used at proper dosages it's probably extremely safe. But...typically so are "man-made" products.
There's a saying among toxicologists that is something like "the dose makes the poison." Meaning... it isn't a substance that is dangerous or toxic, it is the dose you are exposed to. Some things take very minute amounts to be harmful and others take a huge amount. Heck, even water is toxic if you drink enough. What you really want, of course, is something that does what you want it to do at a much lower dose than a harmful or toxic dose.

But to assume and proclaim something is "safe" and inherently better because it "isn't a chemical" (which it is - or, stated more correctly, which it contains) and it is "natural" (which doesn't make it safe) when nobody really knows anything about it isn't a good basis for a decision IMO.
 

Lyzelle

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
2,826
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Colorado
#38
I've yet to see or hear of a dog drop dead from the wiff of an onion, clove of garlic, or vinegar.

The chemicals in many popular flea and tick medications and products, however...well, they have quite a different track record. Many of the synthetic chemicals used actually work because they interfere with the insects' nervous system. Either by blocking chlorine and therefore causing paralysis or by simply blocking nerve transmission completely. And given how many neurological symptoms have been documented and warned against while using these products...hm. I'll personally steer clear, and that is a decision I'm quite happy with.

There is nothing inherently dangerous about onions, garlic, or vinegar. If there were, I would think we would certainly know and plenty of dogs would be dead by now, given how many food companies put onions or garlic in their formulas.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
#39
So the anecdotal evidence with no reports of dogs being injured in any way from Bug Off Garlic, while MANY cases have been reported of injuries/side effects of products like Bio Spot, doesn't let you assume that one product is safer? What more research is there, if there are no controlled experiments to read by scientists?
Well, first of all all topical man-made flea/tick control products are not the same. It's interesting that you use Bio Spot as an example because it traditionally has contained pyrethrins as its active ingredients - which ironically are completely natural, plant derived (from Chysanthemums), and relatively toxic (especially to cats) compounds compared to the active ingredients in something like Frontline or Advantage which are 100% man-made and quite a bit safer. I think very recently Bio Spot has switched to pyrethroids which are pyrethrin-like but man-made.

Anyway, I have thousands of anecdotal reports of dogs using Frontline with no injury/side effects whatsoever.
 

JessLough

Love My Mutt
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
13,404
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
33
Location
Guelph, Ontario
#40
We don't use anything, because I'm not a fan of putting (what i find) unnecessary chemicals, natural or not, on or in my dog.

16 years later, with daily hikes in the woods and daily swimming in the summer and we've never had an issue, either. Well, we've had ticks in the house, but it was the foster ferret that was found as a stray :p
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top