New titling classes for AKC

Saeleofu

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
9,036
Likes
0
Points
36
#2
Just for clarity, if you want to do ALL the optional titles, it would be in this order:

Beginner novice
Pre-novice
Novice
Graduate novice
Pre-open
Open
Graduate Open
Pre-utilty
Utility
Versatility


Correct?
 

Saeleofu

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
9,036
Likes
0
Points
36
#4
Ha, too true. Five titles before you ever get to open? I can understand the Beginner Novice and/or Pre-Novice for people new to obedience. I'm going to start Beginner Novice this year with Logan just to get a feel for formal obedience. But once you get a CD, you ought to have an idea of what you're doing.
 

Keechak

Aussie Obssessed
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
770
Likes
0
Points
16
Location
Wisconsin
#6
from what I understand these new classes aren't even required, you don't HAVE to enter Graduate novice before you enter Open for example.
 

Shai

& the Muttly Crew
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,215
Likes
0
Points
36
#7
from what I understand these new classes aren't even required, you don't HAVE to enter Graduate novice before you enter Open for example.
That's correct, you can still title through Novice-Open-Utility just like before and ignore everything else.
 

MicksMom

Active Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
3,978
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Warren Co, NJ
#8
OK, now I'm confused- does that mean they're doing away with Beginner Novice?


from what I understand these new classes aren't even required, you don't HAVE to enter Graduate novice before you enter Open for example.
Correct. Optional titling classes can be done in any order, and you can enter more than one level at the same show.

ETA- Nevermind- I saw BN in the judging time schedule.
 
Last edited:

MicksMom

Active Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
3,978
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Warren Co, NJ
#10
Jumping from the cdx to ud it's a leap so I can see some building blocks and I think the bn is a good idea but more steps?
They aren't required, and you don't have to do them in order. There are people where we train who have UDs on their dogs and have "gone back" and put a BN on them. I think, on the handler & dog part, it's more for ring experience, or in the case of an older dog who likes to compete, a way to keep them active. On the AKC's part- it's money.
 

AdrianneIsabel

Glutton for Crazy
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
8,893
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Portland, Oregon
#11
Oh I know we don't have to do them, I do genuinely believe its good to do a BN before a CD because its far less pressure and a great introduction to the ring. Also, I do genuinely believe a stepping stone between the CDX and UD would be nice as they are really very different and lack any real building blocks from previous classes.

I don't however see the drive to spend money to go between the BN & CD with a prenovice? What do you practice in there, that you don't in the BN, to prepare for the CD? Maybe I need to reread the PDF again.

On that note, I'd rather see more wildcards at discount prices, but that doesn't financially benefit the AKC.
 

MicksMom

Active Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
3,978
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Warren Co, NJ
#12
...
I don't however see the drive to spend money to go between the BN & CD with a prenovice? What do you practice in there, that you don't in the BN, to prepare for the CD? Maybe I need to reread the PDF again...
I haven't read the class requirements yet, but I'm thinking a benefit would be more ring time. Once you earn the BN title, I don't think you can show in that class anymore (after the grace period). And, again, those older dogs who maybe can't physicaly earn an OTCH would have something to compete in. But, my gut is telling me the bottom line is money for the AKC.
 

Shai

& the Muttly Crew
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,215
Likes
0
Points
36
#13
Oh I know we don't have to do them, I do genuinely believe its good to do a BN before a CD because its far less pressure and a great introduction to the ring. Also, I do genuinely believe a stepping stone between the CDX and UD would be nice as they are really very different and lack any real building blocks from previous classes.

I don't however see the drive to spend money to go between the BN & CD with a prenovice? What do you practice in there, that you don't in the BN, to prepare for the CD? Maybe I need to reread the PDF again.

On that note, I'd rather see more wildcards at discount prices, but that doesn't financially benefit the AKC.
Yeah I figured you knew but with them listed in order like that earlier in the thread I just wanted to clarify for those who may not.

As for why competitors would bother spending money on these classes, I can think of several reasons even just among people I know:

1- Wanting to play with an older or physically limited dog. The new classes have short jump heights (half I think).

2- Proving skills in the working section of the test while avoiding group stays. This particularly for people who had a bad experience or witnessed a bad experience with a dog who had no business doing group exercises.

3- Extra ring time. Some will treat these as C matches for training or brushing up on skills in a trial environment.

4- Alphabet soupers. There are those who simply must collect all the letter regardless of value-added. Some just like the collection, others think the list of letters make their dog look more accomplished (whether he is or not). The later can also often be ID'd by listing everything under the sun (NA NAJ NAF OA OAJ CD BN CDX...) even though some supercede earlier titles or by collecting and advertising for instance rally novice titles from five organizations and advertising their dog as a rally superstar though they've never Q'd in even the second tier of difficulty.

5- Someone with a retired dog who just wants to play a round, or with a novice dog who just wants to see where they are, or a handler who gets nervous in the ring who wants practice without what they perceive as the higher pressure of the normal classes.

There are probably others but those come to mind.
 

elegy

overdogged
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
7,720
Likes
1
Points
0
#15
Pre-Open makes me want to dust Luce off and try her out. My reason for never entering her in Open was she can't jump that high or long anymore. But Pre-Open is half height/width.

Maybe if they offer it locally....
 

Flyinsbt

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
886
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Portland, OR
#16
The biggest point of controversy in AKC obedience is group stays, and jump heights. Note that the new Pre-classes involve lower jump heights, and no group stays. It's obvious that rather than change the existing program, they just added new classes that people can title in.

I might bring Tess back out for pre-Open and pre-Utility. We'll see. I am one who is avoiding group stays, because they make her uncomfortable, but I do like training the more advanced exercises.
 

MandyPug

Sport Model Pug
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,332
Likes
0
Points
36
Age
32
Location
Southern Alberta
#17
Do you guys have veteran heights down there? We do up here for dogs over 7 years and it allows for lowered jump heights (not sure how much lower but it's still lower)
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top