The clusterflump we call a "breed standard"

S

SevenSins

Guest
#1
Something on Facebook today struck me as hilarious and sad at the same time. The revised UKC standard for the APBT states, "The topline inclines very slightly downward from the withers to a broad, muscular, level back. The loin is short, muscular and slightly arched to the top of the croup, but narrower than the rib cage and with a moderate tuck-up. The croup is slightly sloping downward."

Would the class care to point out what is wrong with this statement? :p What inconsistencies or contradictions are in the standards for your breed?
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#2
I'm not seeing it, to be honest. Maybe the terms used for dogs aren't the same as horses? I admit to knowing horse body parts much better - and for a horse, I don't see anything contradictory.

Or is the "inclines downward" what you are referring to? That's kind of an odd word choice.
 

stardogs

Behavior Nerd
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
4,925
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
NC
#3
The two mentions of "inclines downward" makes me think you're going to end up with dogs who look like showline GSDs soon enough...
 

Lyzelle

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
2,826
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Colorado
#4
"The topline inclines very slightly downward from the withers to a broad, muscular, level back. The loin is short, muscular and slightly arched to the top of the croup, but narrower than the rib cage and with a moderate tuck-up. The croup is slightly sloping downward."
Bolded is what I read.

But many GSD people everywhere hate me for my usage of "level back" meaning a STRAIGHT, level, test it with a leveler type of topline. Not a sloping one.

So I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:

Flyinsbt

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
886
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Portland, OR
#5
Okay, you can't incline downwards, but it's not a bad description. It's more descriptive than the SBT standard, which just states the topline should be "level". Which people sometimes interpret that it should be tabletop flat, which is not very functional. In reality, a correct topline is considered by most of us to be similar to what it sounds like yours describes. Higher at withers, level back, slight arch over loin, slope at croup.
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#6
I guess I split the "back" up into smaller bits.

I read it as
The topline inclines very slightly downward from the withers
The dogs withers should be slightly higher than the main portion of the back


to a broad, muscular, level back
The area between the withers and the loin should be level with good muscular definition, and "broad" as in, not dropping off from the spine.

The loin is short, muscular and slightly arched to the top of the croup, but narrower than the rib cage and with a moderate tuck-up.
.The area just behind the back, where the ribs end, should continue to be well muscled, but should get more narrow than the back (because there are no more ribs springing it out). It should arch up towards the point of the croup where..

The croup is slightly sloping downward."
It then drops off slightly to the tail.

*shrug* Like I said, I'm a horse person more than a dog person when it comes to this sort of thing. But it all sounds good to me, and much like what I would want in a sport horse, although the loin doesn't tend to narrow as much in a horse as a dog.
 

OwnedByBCs

Will Creep For Sheep
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
588
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado
#7
Something on Facebook today struck me as hilarious and sad at the same time. The revised UKC standard for the APBT states, "The topline inclines very slightly downward from the withers to a broad, muscular, level back. The loin is short, muscular and slightly arched to the top of the croup, but narrower than the rib cage and with a moderate tuck-up. The croup is slightly sloping downward."

Would the class care to point out what is wrong with this statement? :p What inconsistencies or contradictions are in the standards for your breed?
Well, I guess to me it seems like a bit of a contradiction. First, they say the topline is slightly sloping. Then they say its level. Then they say there is a slight arch to the croup, then they say the croup is sloping downward. I am picturing a dog with a zig-zag topline..
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#8
Be jealous of my mad art skills.



These are the four components as I see them being mentioned in the standard. Are you sure this isn't the standard for a pony?

I was going to steal a picture of an APBT, but did you know that when you google image "conformation shot pit bull" both a horse and Traveler come up on the first page? I got distracted.
 

JessLough

Love My Mutt
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
13,404
Likes
2
Points
38
Age
33
Location
Guelph, Ontario
#9
I was going to steal a picture of an APBT, but did you know that when you google image "conformation shot pit bull" both a horse and Traveler come up on the first page? I got distracted.
So it does... :lol-sign:

ETA: I don't see a horse, but I see Traveler, a kitten and a kit/baby ferret
 

Lyzelle

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
2,826
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Colorado
#10
A high wither isn't always desired in horses, particularly warmbloods. Croup is also a huge variance, depending on what the horse is built for. A downhill/uphill/level topline is also measured from the top of the shoulder to the top of the hip...not as the topline as a whole. The length between should also be much shorter than the underline in order to create balance.

In short, dogs and horses are different beings, and judged differently even within their own species. What is desirable in a horse, is not always desirable in a dog. And vice versa.
 

BostonBanker

Active Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
8,854
Likes
1
Points
36
Location
Vermont
#11
Oh, I wasn't trying to pass judgement on whether or not that is a good standard; my knowledge of APBT conformation is pretty much the same as my knowledge of nuclear physics. But it doesn't seem contradictory to me, as the OP implied, because it sounds like what I (tried) to draw.

To me, the standard describes four very distinct parts of the body (withers, back, loin, croup).
 

Saeleofu

Active Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
9,036
Likes
0
Points
36
#12
To me, the standard describes four very distinct parts of the body (withers, back, loin, croup).
That's how I read it, too. I think it definitely CAN be confusing if you're reading it quickly and there are all these up/down/straight/arched/etc words in there.

The only bit I thought was odd was "inclines very slightly downward" - I'd reword it as "slopes very slightly downward" since incline is generally understood to be sloping upwards.
 

Aleron

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
2,269
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
NE Ohio
#13
*shrug* Like I said, I'm a horse person more than a dog person when it comes to this sort of thing. But it all sounds good to me, and much like what I would want in a sport horse, although the loin doesn't tend to narrow as much in a horse as a dog.
I'm not a horse person but I read it the same as you. To me, that is what is meant by those terms.
 

Members online

Top